Zheng Wu1, Yong Su, Rui-Fang Zeng, Mo-Fa Gu, Shao-Min Huang. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze prognostic factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT); in addition, we aimed to elucidate the value of primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) in predicting prognosis of patients. METHODS: Between February 2001 and December 2008, 321 patients with NPC treated with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT were analyzed retrospectively. GTVp was calculated from treatment planning computed tomography scans. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to determine the best cutoff point of GTVp. RESULTS: The 5-year local failure-free survival (LFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for NPC patients were 93.8, 80.1, 73.0, and 83.7 %, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that GTVp had exhibited a statistically significant correlation with LFFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS (P < 0.05, all), whereas T classification was not an independent prognostic factor. According to ROC curve analysis, 49 and 19 mL were determined as the cutoff points of GTVp for local control and distant metastasis, respectively. Based on this, 321 patients were divided into three volume subgroups. LFFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS demonstrated significant differences among patients in different volume subgroups (P < 0.001, all) and were superior to T classification for predicting prognosis of NPC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Primary gross tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in local control, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival in NPC. An adjusted TNM staging system that includes GTVp as a quantitative indicator to evaluate prognosis is warranted.
PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze prognostic factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT); in addition, we aimed to elucidate the value of primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) in predicting prognosis of patients. METHODS: Between February 2001 and December 2008, 321 patients with NPC treated with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT were analyzed retrospectively. GTVp was calculated from treatment planning computed tomography scans. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to determine the best cutoff point of GTVp. RESULTS: The 5-year local failure-free survival (LFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for NPCpatients were 93.8, 80.1, 73.0, and 83.7 %, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that GTVp had exhibited a statistically significant correlation with LFFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS (P < 0.05, all), whereas T classification was not an independent prognostic factor. According to ROC curve analysis, 49 and 19 mL were determined as the cutoff points of GTVp for local control and distant metastasis, respectively. Based on this, 321 patients were divided into three volume subgroups. LFFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS demonstrated significant differences among patients in different volume subgroups (P < 0.001, all) and were superior to T classification for predicting prognosis of NPCpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Primary gross tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in local control, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival in NPC. An adjusted TNM staging system that includes GTVp as a quantitative indicator to evaluate prognosis is warranted.
Authors: Suzanne L Wolden; William C Chen; David G Pfister; Dennis H Kraus; Sean L Berry; Michael J Zelefsky Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Anne W M Lee; W H Lau; Stewart Y Tung; Daniel T T Chua; Rick Chappell; L Xu; Lillian Siu; W M Sze; T W Leung; Jonathan S T Sham; Roger K C Ngan; Stephen C K Law; T K Yau; Joseph S K Au; Brian O'Sullivan; Ellie S Y Pang; S K O; Gordon K H Au; Joseph T Lau Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael K M Kam; Peter M L Teo; Ricky M C Chau; K Y Cheung; Peter H K Choi; W H Kwan; S F Leung; Benny Zee; Anthony T C Chan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: D T Chua; J S Sham; D L Kwong; K S Tai; P M Wu; M Lo; A Yung; D Choy; L Leong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: B K H Law; A D King; K S Bhatia; A T Ahuja; M K M Kam; B B Ma; Q Y Ai; F K F Mo; J Yuan; D K W Yeung Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 3.825