Literature DB >> 19362784

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy: report on the 3-year outcome of a prospective series.

Shaojun Lin1, Jianji Pan, Lu Han, Xiuchun Zhang, Xiyi Liao, Jiade J Lu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using reduced clinical target volumes (CTV) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 2003 and December 2006, 323 patients with NPC were treated with IMRT according to this institutional protocol. Presenting stages were Stage II in 63, Stage III in 166, and Stage IVA/B in 94 patients. High-risk CTV encompassed gross tumor volume and entire nasopharyngeal mucosa with a margin. A reduced CTV was delineated for the remaining subclinical regions adjacent to the primary disease. Uninvolved neck nodes were delineated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) consensus excluding the deep jugular (i.e., lymph nodes in retrostyloid space above C1 vertebra) and submental nodes. Patients with locoregionally advanced diseases also received cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 4-53 months), 12, 6, and 26 patients had developed local, regional, and distant failures, respectively. The 3-year estimated local control, regional control, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival were 95%, 98%, 90%, 85%, and 90%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that T-classification had no predictive value for outcome, whereas N-classification was significant for predicting metastasis-free (p = 0.005) and overall survival (p =0.006). Ten patients (7.8%) experienced Grade II xerostomia at 24 months after treatment. No Grade III or IV late-toxicities were observed. Two patients died of treatment-induced complications.
CONCLUSION: The IMRT approach using a reduced target volume provided favorable outcome for NPC with acceptable toxicity. This strategy needs to be optimized and then tested in a prospective setting to learn whether further improvement can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19362784     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  100 in total

1.  Systemic chemotherapy followed by locoregional definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy yields prolonged survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with distant metastasis at initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Shao-xuan Hu; Xiao-hui He; Mei Dong; Bo Jia; Sheng-yu Zhou; Jian-liang Yang; Sheng Yang; Chang-Gong Zhang; Peng Liu; Yan Qin; Lin Gui
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  The dosimetric comparison of the radiotherapeutic plans between composite and synchronous planning approaches in sequential IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Gang Zhou; Yanze Sun; Jianjun Qian; Ye Tian; Xueguan Lu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Prognostic nomogram for refining the prognostication of the proposed 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jian Ji Pan; Wai Tong Ng; Jing Feng Zong; Sarah W M Lee; Horace C W Choi; Lucy L K Chan; Shao Jun Lin; Qiao Juan Guo; Henry C K Sze; Yun Bin Chen; You Ping Xiao; Wai Kuen Kan; Brian O'Sullivan; Wei Xu; Quynh Thu Le; Christine M Glastonbury; A Dimitrios Colevas; Randal S Weber; William Lydiatt; Jatin P Shah; Anne W M Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prognostic value of tumor volume for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zheng Wu; Yong Su; Rui-Fang Zeng; Mo-Fa Gu; Shao-Min Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Is it necessary to repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

Authors:  Chuanben Chen; Xiang Lin; Jianji Pan; Zhaodong Fei; Lisha Chen; Penggang Bai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Organ-sparing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  XiaoShen Wang; ChaoSu Hu; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  IMRT and IGRT in head and neck cancer: Have we delivered what we promised?

Authors:  Gupta Tejpal; Agarwal Jaiprakash; Bannerjee Susovan; Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21

8.  Alternative endpoints to the 5-year overall survival and locoregional control for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of 2,450 patients.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Wei Yi; Jin Gao; Xiao-Hui Li; Lu-Jun Shen; Bo-Fei Li; Zi-Wei Tu; Ya-Lan Tao; Chang-Bin Jiang; Yun-Fei Xia
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20

9.  Clinical observation and quality of life in terms of nasal sinusitis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term results from different nasal irrigation techniques.

Authors:  H-H Luo; Z-C Fu; H-H Cheng; S-G Liao; D-S Li; L-P Cheng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Sequential chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the management of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: experience of 370 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Shaojun Lin; Jiade Jay Lu; Lu Han; Qisong Chen; Jianji Pan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.