Literature DB >> 15936155

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharynx cancer: update of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience.

Suzanne L Wolden1, William C Chen, David G Pfister, Dennis H Kraus, Sean L Berry, Michael J Zelefsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated that intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) significantly improves radiation dose distribution over three-dimensional planning for nasopharynx cancer and reported positive early clinical results. We now evaluate whether IMRT has resulted in improved outcomes for a larger cohort of patients with longer follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Since 1998, all 74 patients with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic nasopharynx cancer were treated with IMRT using accelerated fractionation to 70 Gy; 59 received a hyperfractionated concomitant boost, and more recently 15 received once-daily treatment with dose painting. With the exception of Stage I disease (n = 5) and patient preference (n = 1), 69 patients received concurrent and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy similar to that in the Intergroup 0099 trial. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: median age 45; 32% Asian; 72% male; 65% World Health Organization III; 6% Stage I, 16% Stage II, 30% Stage III, 47% Stage IV. Median follow-up is 35 months. The 3-year actuarial rate of local control is 91%, and regional control is 93%; freedom from distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival at 3 years are 78%, 67%, and 83%, respectively. There was 100% local control for Stage T1/T2 disease, compared to 83% for T3/T4 disease (p = 0.01). Six patients failed at the primary site, with median time to local tumor progression 16 months; 5 were exclusively within the 70 Gy volume, and 1 was both within and outside the target volume. There is a trend for improved local control with IMRT when compared to local control of 79% for 35 patients treated before 1998 with three-dimensional planning and chemotherapy (p = 0.11). Six months posttherapy, 21%, 13%, 15%, and 0% of patients with follow-up audiograms (n = 24 patients) had Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 sensorineural hearing loss, respectively. For patients with >1 year follow-up (n = 59), rates of long-term xerostomia were as follows: 26% none, 42% Grade 1, 32% Grade 2, and zero Grade 3.
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of primary site failure within the target volume suggests locally advanced T stage disease may require a higher biologic dose to gross tumor. Rates of severe (Grade 3-4) ototoxicity and xerostomia are low with IMRT as a result of normal-tissue protection. Distant metastases are now the dominant form of failure, emphasizing the need for improved systemic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15936155     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  136 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Pei-Ju Chao; Hui-Min Ting; Su-Hua Lo; Yu-Wen Wang; Chiu-Ching Tuan; Fu-Min Fang; Te-Jen Su
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Systemic chemotherapy followed by locoregional definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy yields prolonged survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with distant metastasis at initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Shao-xuan Hu; Xiao-hui He; Mei Dong; Bo Jia; Sheng-yu Zhou; Jian-liang Yang; Sheng Yang; Chang-Gong Zhang; Peng Liu; Yan Qin; Lin Gui
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: management strategies and economic impact.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB‑IMRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Evangelia Peponi; Christoph Glanzmann; Guntram Kunz; Christoph Renner; Katja Tomuschat; Gabriela Studer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Organ sparing and clinical outcome with step-and-shoot IMRT for head and neck cancer: a mono-institutional experience.

Authors:  Rosario Mazzola; Giuseppe Ferrera; Filippo Alongi; Mariella Mannino; Boris Abbate; Teresa Cucchiara; Giuseppina Iacoviello; Francesco Sciumè; Gioacchino Di Paola; Manuela Federico; Livio Blasi; Antonio Lo Casto; Roberto Lagalla; Domenico Messana
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  [Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A model for modern radio-oncology].

Authors:  M W Münter; E M Stoiber; A D Jensen; J Debus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  Clinical application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  O Ballivy; R Galiana Santamaría; A Lozano Borbalas; F Guedea Edo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Prognostic value of tumor volume for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zheng Wu; Yong Su; Rui-Fang Zeng; Mo-Fa Gu; Shao-Min Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Alternative endpoints to the 5-year overall survival and locoregional control for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of 2,450 patients.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Wei Yi; Jin Gao; Xiao-Hui Li; Lu-Jun Shen; Bo-Fei Li; Zi-Wei Tu; Ya-Lan Tao; Chang-Bin Jiang; Yun-Fei Xia
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20

10.  An international collaboration to harmonize the quantitative plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA assay for future biomarker-guided trials in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Quynh-Thu Le; Qiang Zhang; Hongbin Cao; Ann-Joy Cheng; Benjamin A Pinsky; Ruey-Long Hong; Joseph T Chang; Chun-Wei Wang; Kuo-Chien Tsao; Ym Dennis Lo; Nancy Lee; K Kian Ang; Anthony T C Chan; K C Allen Chan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.