Literature DB >> 24170798

Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.

X-Q Shi1, D Benchimol, K Näsström.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The psychophysical properties of a new complementary metal oxide semi-conductor-based detector, ProSensor(®) (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland), in terms of dose response function and perceptibility curve test were performed and compared with those of a charged couple device-based sensor, Dixi(®) (Planmeca Oy).
METHODS: Dose response functions at 66 kVp for a Dixi and a ProSensor were determined by means of multiple exposures to a homogeneous X-ray field covering the whole exposure range. The entry dose of each exposure was measured and registered. The mean grey level in each image was plotted as function of the corresponding exposures for both digital systems. Radiographs of a test object containing ten holes of increasing depth were obtained throughout the exposure range of the two digital sensors at 66 kVp. 12 observers were asked to register the number of perceptible holes in each radiograph. Based on the mean value of the observers' evaluation, the perceptibility curves were constructed, and the integral value under the perceptibility curves were compared between two intraoral sensors.
RESULTS: The results based on dose response function showed that the ProSensor was more sensitive than the Dixi sensor. Paired t-test showed that the minimal perceptible low-contrast details were significantly higher for the ProSensor than for the Dixi sensor (p < 0.001). The integrals below the two perceptibility curves were 33.4 and 69.2 for the Dixi and ProSensor, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Applying the new ProSensor may be beneficial to patients owing to its reduced radiation dose and increased perception for low-contrast details in dentistry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCD; CMOS technique; digital intraoral detector; digital radiography; intraoral radiograph; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24170798      PMCID: PMC3852526          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  12 in total

1.  A simplified method to obtain perceptibility curves for direct dental digital radiography.

Authors:  H C Stamatakis; K Yoshiura; X Q Shi; U Welander; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; H C Stamatakis; U Welander; W D McDavid; X Q Shi; S Ban; T Kawazu; T Chikui; S Kanda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; U Welander; X Q Shi; G Li; T Kawazu; M Tatsumi; K Okamura; W D McDavid; S Kanda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; U Welander; W D McDavid; G Li; X-Q Shi; E Nakayama; M Shimizu; K Okamura; S Kanda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response.

Authors:  G Li; U Welander; K Yoshiura; X-Q Shi; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.

Authors:  E Alpöz; E Soğur; B G Baksi Akdeniz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; H Stamatakis; X Q Shi; U Welander; W D McDavid; J Kristoffersen; G Tronje
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; T Kawazu; T Chikui; M Tatsumi; K Tokumori; T Tanaka; S Kanda
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-01

9.  Perceptibility of defects in an aluminum test object: a comparison of the RVG-S and first generation VIXA systems with and without added niobium filtration.

Authors:  M Wakoh; A G Farman; W C Scarfe; M S Kelly; K Kuroyanagi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; T Kawazu; T Chikui; M Tatsumi; K Tokumori; T Tanaka; S Kanda
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparative study on image quality of two digital intraoral sensors.

Authors:  Cinar Aziman; Kristina Hellén-Halme; Xie-Qi Shi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography.

Authors:  Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz; Gustavo Machado Santaella; Sergio Lucio Pereira de Castro Lopes; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-12-15

3.  Repeat analysis of intraoral digital imaging performed by undergraduate students using a complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor: An institutional case study.

Authors:  Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof; Nur Liyana Abdul Rahman; Amiza Aqiela Ahmad Asri; Noor Ilyani Othman; Ilham Wan Mokhtar
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-12-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.