Literature DB >> 24170190

Association between pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and reparability of large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Tim Dwyer1, Helen Razmjou, Patrick Henry, Simon Gosselin-Fournier, Richard Holtby.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is recognized that a percentage of large and massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) cannot be anatomically repaired. We hypothesized that factors identified on pre-operative MRI would be associated with rotator cuff reparability.
METHODS: A single-surgeon retrospective study was performed on patients who had undergone either an anatomical or partial repair of a large or massive RCT. Pre-operative MRI images were evaluated by a fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon, blinded to the surgical outcome. Stump location, tear dimension in the coronal and sagittal plane, fatty infiltration, muscle atrophy (occupation ratio, tangent sign), and superior migration of the humeral head (acromion-humeral distance, inferior glenohumeral distance, and best-fit humeral circle technique) were assessed as the predictors of repair. Logistic regression and chi-square analyses were used.
RESULTS: A total of sixty patients with median age 63 (range 40-83) were included. On MRI, reparability was associated with increased medial-lateral (ML) tear size (p = 0.003), but not increased AP tear size (n.s.). An association was seen between partial repair and tendon retraction to or beyond the glenoid (p = 0.0005), positive tangent sign (p = 0.04), advanced supraspinatus fatty infiltration in isolation (p = 0.046), combined advanced supraspinatus and infraspinatus fatty infiltration (p = 0.04), and superior migration of the humeral head as measured by the inferior glenohumeral distance only (p = 0.004). Multivariable analysis identified increased ML tear size as the most significant factor associated with partial repair.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MRI findings of tendon retraction to or beyond the glenoid, increased inferior glenohumeral distance, and a positive tangent sign are associated with irreparability of large and massive RCTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24170190     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2745-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

1.  The effect of infraspinatus disruption on glenohumeral torque and superior migration of the humeral head: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Nariyuki Mura; Shawn W O'Driscoll; Mark E Zobitz; Guido Heers; Thomas R Jenkyn; Siaw-Meng Chou; Andreas M Halder; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Correlation of arthroscopic repairability of large to massive rotator cuff tears with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans.

Authors:  Jae Chul Yoo; Jin Hwan Ahn; Jae Hyuk Yang; Kyoung Hwan Koh; Sang Hee Choi; Young Cheol Yoon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Surgically repaired massive rotator cuff tears: MRI of tendon integrity, muscle fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy correlated with intraoperative and clinical findings.

Authors:  J M Mellado; J Calmet; M Olona; C Esteve; A Camins; L Pérez Del Palomar; J Giné; A Saurí
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  C Gerber; B Fuchs; J Hodler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Effect of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity: a manifestation of the "magic angle" phenomenon.

Authors:  S J Erickson; I H Cox; J S Hyde; G F Carrera; J A Strandt; L D Estkowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan.

Authors:  D Goutallier; J M Postel; J Bernageau; L Lavau; M C Voisin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs.

Authors:  Bernhard Jost; Matthias Zumstein; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Rotator cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair for large tears with less-than-optimal footprint coverage.

Authors:  Jae Chul Yoo; Jin Hwan Ahn; Kyoung Hwan Koh; Kyung Sub Lim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with stage 3 and 4 fatty degeneration.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Johannes R H Barth; David P Richards; Michael B Zlatkin; Mitchell Larsen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Clinical and biomechanical performance of patients with failed rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Lubiatowski; Piotr Kaczmarek; Marcin Dzianach; Piotr Ogrodowicz; Maciej Bręborowicz; Jan Długosz; Ewa Lisiewicz; Leszek Romanowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  22 in total

1.  Should massive rotator cuff tears be reconstructed even when only partially repairable?

Authors:  Arnaud Godenèche; Benjamin Freychet; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Julien Clechet; Yannick Carrillon; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  State of the art in rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Klaus Bak; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Tear progression of symptomatic full-thickness and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears as measured by repeated MRI.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Kim; Sung-Eun Kim; Sung-Ho Bae; Hyo-Jin Lee; Won-Hee Jee; Chang Kyun Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Rotator cuff disorders: How to write a surgically relevant magnetic resonance imaging report?

Authors:  Ahmed M Tawfik; Ahmad El-Morsy; Mohamed Aboelnour Badran
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28

5.  Fatty infiltration of the shoulder: diagnosis and reversibility.

Authors:  Leonardo Osti; Matteo Buda; Angelo Del Buono
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-02-24

6.  Irreparable rotator cuff tears: a novel classification system.

Authors:  R Castricini; M De Benedetto; N Orlando; E Gervasi; A Castagna
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

7.  Rotator cuff tear characteristics: how comparable are the pre-operative MRI findings with intra-operative measurements following debridement during arthroscopic repair?

Authors:  Ilker Eren; Hakan Ozben; Caner Gunerbuyuk; Özgür Koyuncu; Murat Serhat Aygün; Edip Hatipoglu; Üstün Aydingöz; Mehmet Demirhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Management of Acute Work-Related Shoulder Injuries by an Early Shoulder Assessment Program: Efficiency of Imaging Investigations.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Sandra Lincoln; Christopher Geddes; Dragana Boljanovic; Iona Macritchie; Caterina Virdo-Cristello; Danielle Medeiros; Robin R Richards
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 9.  Massive Rotator Cuff Tear: When to Consider Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas R Sellers; Adham Abdelfattah; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

10.  Arthroscopic management of massive rotator cuff tears: an evaluation of debridement, complete, and partial repair with and without force couple restoration.

Authors:  Philipp R Heuberer; Roman Kölblinger; Stefan Buchleitner; Leo Pauzenberger; Brenda Laky; Alexander Auffarth; Philipp Moroder; Sylvia Salem; Bernhard Kriegleder; Werner Anderl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.