Literature DB >> 16510810

Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs.

Bernhard Jost1, Matthias Zumstein, Christian W A Pfirrmann, Christian Gerber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, twenty consecutive patients with a rerupture of the rotator cuff, as documented with magnetic resonance imaging, were found to have significantly less pain and better function and strength, compared with the preoperative state, at 3.2 years postoperatively. It was the purpose of this study to determine the clinical and structural outcomes of these reruptures in the same twenty patients after a longer period of follow-up.
METHODS: At a mean of 7.6 years postoperatively, the twenty patients were reexamined clinically and with standard radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging with use of the same clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging criteria as were utilized in the review at 3.2 years. The mean age at the time of final follow-up was sixty-six years.
RESULTS: Nineteen of the twenty patients continued to be either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome. The relative Constant score averaged 88% and was not significantly different from the score at 3.2 years, which averaged 83%. The mean scores for pain, function, and strength also had not changed significantly. Overall, the twenty reruptures had not increased in size, and eight of them had healed structurally at the time of the 7.6-year follow-up. Seven of these eight reruptures had been of the supraspinatus tendon only, and seven had been smaller than 400 mm(2) at 3.2 years. Twelve reruptures persisted, and five were larger than the preoperative tear. Fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle progressed significantly (p = 0.015) and the acromiohumeral distance decreased significantly (p = 0.006) between the two follow-up periods. Neither fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus and subscapularis muscles nor glenohumeral osteoarthritis progressed significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: At an average of 7.6 years, the clinical outcomes after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs remained significantly improved over the preoperative state in terms of pain, function, strength, and patient satisfaction. Overall, the reruptures that had been present at 3.2 years did not increase in size. We also found that reruptures of the supraspinatus that had been smaller than 400 mm(2) had the potential to heal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510810     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  73 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is not useful after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Kim; Jae Sung Lee; Chi Woo Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Material properties of common suture materials in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  S Najibi; R Banglmeier; Jm Matta; M Tannast
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

Review 3.  [Clinical management of rotator cuff tears. Current concepts in cell-based therapy strategies].

Authors:  A Ficklscherer; M F Pietschmann; M Bendiks; B P Roßbach; P E Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Milano; Andrea Grasso; Donatella Zarelli; Laura Deriu; Mario Cillo; Carlo Fabbriciani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Multimodality imaging of the postoperative shoulder.

Authors:  Klaus Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Association between pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and reparability of large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Helen Razmjou; Patrick Henry; Simon Gosselin-Fournier; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  CORR Insights®: What Influence Does Progression of a Nonhealing Rotator Cuff Tear Have on Shoulder Pain and Function?

Authors:  Maximiliano Ranalletta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Changes of fatty infiltration according to the immediate postoperative time point in magnetic resonance imaging after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Ji Wan Park; Chris Hyunchul Jo; Ji Sun Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Open versus two forms of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Neal L Millar; Xiao Wu; Robyn Tantau; Elizabeth Silverstone; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.