Literature DB >> 19501285

Correlation of arthroscopic repairability of large to massive rotator cuff tears with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans.

Jae Chul Yoo1, Jin Hwan Ahn, Jae Hyuk Yang, Kyoung Hwan Koh, Sang Hee Choi, Young Cheol Yoon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) variables that could predict the repairability of large to massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs), especially in terms of distinguishing between complete repair and incomplete repair.
METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients who had large to massive RCTs were treated by arthroscopic repair with suture anchors. The primary repair was subclassified into 4 types. Types I and II were complete repairs with coverage of the lateral end of the greater tuberosity footprint (type I) or to the medial one half or less of the footprint (type II). Types III and IV were incomplete repairs with either small exposure of the humeral head (<10 mm) (type III) or moderate exposure of the head with repair of the force couple of the rotator cuff (type IV). Six preoperative MRI measurements (fatty degeneration index [FDI] in all planes, occupational grade, tangent sign, coronal oblique tear distance [COTD], sagittal oblique tear distance [SOTD], and coronal oblique thickness) that were reported in the previous literature were examined. These measurements were correlated with our classification of repair.
RESULTS: There were 28 large and 23 massive tears. Interobserver reproducibility was good to excellent. When we compared the completely and incompletely repaired groups, the FDI values for sagittal oblique sections of the supraspinatus and the infraspinatus and the FDI values for COTD and SOTD showed statistically significant differences. The cutoff values for SOTD and COTD were 32 mm and 31 mm, respectively. Regarding FDI, values greater than 3 on sagittal oblique sections of the supraspinatus and greater than 2 on sagittal oblique sections of the infraspinatus can be discouraging findings for complete repair.
CONCLUSIONS: On preoperative MRI of RCTs, FDI values of greater than 3 on sagittal oblique sections of the supraspinatus and greater than 2 on sagittal oblique sections of the infraspinatus with greater than 31 mm in COTD and 32 mm in SOTD can imply incomplete arthroscopic repair of the torn tendon or type III/IV repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, development of diagnostic criteria based on consecutive patients with universally applied gold standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19501285     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  28 in total

1.  Association between pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and reparability of large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Helen Razmjou; Patrick Henry; Simon Gosselin-Fournier; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Allogenic Myocytes and Mesenchymal Stem Cells Partially Improve Fatty Rotator Cuff Degeneration in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Mehmet F Güleçyüz; Konstanze Macha; Matthias F Pietschmann; Andreas Ficklscherer; Birte Sievers; Björn P Roßbach; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Should massive rotator cuff tears be reconstructed even when only partially repairable?

Authors:  Arnaud Godenèche; Benjamin Freychet; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Julien Clechet; Yannick Carrillon; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The effect of multiple channeling on the structural integrity of repaired rotator cuff.

Authors:  Chris Hyunchul Jo; Kang Sup Yoon; Ji Ho Lee; Seung Baik Kang; Jae Hyup Lee; Hyuk Soo Han; Seung Hwan Rhee; Ji Sun Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Decision-making in massive rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  André Thès; Philippe Hardy; Klaus Bak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Ultrasound determination of rotator cuff tear repairability.

Authors:  Andrew K Tse; Patrick H Lam; Judie R Walton; Lisa Hackett; George Ac Murrell
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2015-05-12

8.  Partial and complete repairs of massive rotator cuff tears maintain similar long-term improvements in clinical scores.

Authors:  Marion Besnard; Benjamin Freychet; Julien Clechet; Gerjon Hannink; Mo Saffarini; Yannick Carrillon; Arnaud Godenèche
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A radiographic classification of massive rotator cuff tear arthritis.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Hamada; Kaoru Yamanaka; Yoshiyasu Uchiyama; Takahiko Mikasa; Motohiko Mikasa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparable clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Miyatake; Yoshitsugu Takeda; Koji Fujii; Naoto Suzue; Yoshiteru Kawasaki; Yasuyuki Omichi; Kenji Yokoyama
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.