Literature DB >> 24163094

Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem.

Young-Hoo Kim1, Jang-Won Park, Jun-Shik Kim, Jun-Seok Kang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term results of standard total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients were not optimal. There are a number of reported disadvantages to longer cementless stems in THA including thigh pain and proximal stress shielding. However, it is unknown whether a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic stem without diaphyseal fixation, which represents a possible alternative, will maintain fixation over the longer term. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We therefore evaluated long-term (1) clinical results using validated scoring instruments; (2) osseointegration and bone remodeling; (3) complications; and (4) rates of revision and osteolysis in patients younger than 65 years who underwent THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem.
METHODS: We reviewed 500 patients (630 hips) younger than 65 years (mean age at surgery, 52.7 years) who underwent THA with the Immediate Postoperative Stability stem (IPS; DePuy, Leeds, UK) by one surgeon (Y-HK) from January 1995 to March 2002. Demographic data, Harris hip score, WOMAC score, UCLA activity score, and radiographic data were recorded. All patients underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning of the acetabulum and proximal femur at 2 weeks after the operation and at final followup to determine stress shielding. Thigh pain was specifically investigated and scored by patients on a visual analog scale. Other complications were recorded. We determined component survival rates at 15 years using revision and aseptic loosening as end points. Minimum followup was 11 years (mean, 15.8 years; range, 11-18 years).
RESULTS: The clinical and functional results improved significantly for the Harris hip score, WOMAC, and UCLA activity scores (p < 0.001). At latest followup, mean Harris hip, WOMAC, and UCLA activity scores were 94 (range, 71-100), 15 (range, 5-29), and 7.9 (range, 6-9) points, respectively. All hips had osseous integration of the acetabular and femoral components. No patients had thigh pain. Four hips (0.6%) had deep infection and four (0.6%) had a recurrent dislocation. No patients had Grade 3 stress shielding. Fifteen-year survival rates were 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.00) for the acetabular component and 99.4% (95% CI, 0.97-1.00) for the femoral component with revision as the end point and 100% (95% CI, 0.98-1.00) for both components with aseptic loosening as the end point.
CONCLUSIONS: The short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless femoral stem provided stable fixation without relying on diaphyseal fixation in younger patients, suggesting metaphyseal fitting alone is sufficient in young patients who have good bone quality. Because we observed no thigh pain and little stress shielding in our patients, modifying the distal stem design as is done with this implant might be advantageous, but this would need to be determined in future comparative studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24163094      PMCID: PMC3916612          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3354-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  40 in total

1.  The precision of radiostereometric measurements. Manual vs. digital measurements.

Authors:  Niclas Börlin; Truike Thien; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A ten- to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem.

Authors:  P R Aldinger; S J Breusch; M Lukoschek; H Mau; V Ewerbeck; M Thomsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-03

3.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a close proximal fit and short tapered distal stem (third-generation) prosthesis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  A prospective short-term outcome study of a short metaphyseal fitting total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jun-Shik Kim; Jong-Hwan Joo; Jang-Won Park
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 80 years of age.

Authors:  H Pieringer; G Labek; V Auersperg; N Böhler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-07

8.  The results of a proximally-coated cementless femoral component in total hip replacement: a five- to 12-year follow-up.

Authors:  Y-H Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-03

9.  Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jun-Shik Kim; Seung-Hwan Oh; Ju-Moon Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Polyethylene wear and osteolysis after cementless total hip arthroplasty with alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in patients younger than thirty years of age.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Chirag Patel; Dae-Youn Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  16 in total

1.  Arthroplasty in patients with extensive femoral head avascular necrosis: Cementless arthroplasty in extensive femoral head necrosis.

Authors:  Yu-Hang Gao; Shu-Qiang Li; Yun-Feng Wang; Chen Yang; Jian-Guo Liu; Xin Qi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison between uncemented and cemented fixation for the tibial component in distal femoral replacement: a clinical and radiological study.

Authors:  Haijie Liang; Wei Guo; Rongli Yang; Xiaodong Tang; Taiqiang Yan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The learning curve following adoption of a novel short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implications on short-term patient outcomes.

Authors:  Jorge A Padilla; Afshin A Anoushiravani; James E Feng; Ran Schwarzkopf; James Slover; Scott Marwin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-06

4.  Bone-preserving total hip arthroplasty in avascular necrosis of the hip-a matched-pairs analysis.

Authors:  David Merschin; Richard Häne; Mersedeh Tohidnezhad; Thomas Pufe; Wolf Drescher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparing return to sport activities after short metaphyseal femoral arthroplasty with resurfacing and big femoral head arthroplasties.

Authors:  Panagiotis K Karampinas; Eustratios G Papadelis; John A Vlamis; Hlias Basiliadis; Spiros G Pneumaticos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-03

6.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Michał Pyda; Bogdan Koczy; Wojciech Widuchowski; Małgorzata Widuchowska; Tomasz Stołtny; Michał Mielnik; Jacek Hermanson
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-01-25

7.  Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome from Neck-Preserving, Short-Stem Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Younger Osteoarthritis Patients.

Authors:  Marius Dettmer; Amir Pourmoghaddam; Stefan W Kreuzer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-05-26

8.  Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviour of Two Cementless Short Stems for Hip Replacement: Linea Anatomic and Minihip.

Authors:  Sergio Gabarre; Antonio Herrera; Elena Ibarz; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil-Albarova; Luis Gracia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Implant Design in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jung Taek Kim; Jeong Joon Yoo
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

10.  No Clinically Important Differences in Thigh Pain or Bone Loss Between Short Stems and Conventional-length Stems in THA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Seok-Hyung Won; Jung-Wee Park; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.