Literature DB >> 30072546

Reassessing the Association between Circulating Vitamin D and IGFBP-3: Observational and Mendelian Randomization Estimates from Independent Sources.

Vanessa Y Tan1,2, Kalina M Biernacka3,4, Tom Dudding1,2, Carolina Bonilla1,2, Rebecca Gilbert2, Robert C Kaplan5, Qi Qibin5, Alexander Teumer6, Richard M Martin1,2,4, Claire M Perks, Nicholas J Timpson7,2, Jeff M P Holly3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) has been associated with prostate cancer. Preclinical studies found that vitamin D regulates IGFBP-3 expression, although evidence from epidemiologic studies is conflicting.
METHODS: Mendelian randomization analyses (MR) were conducted to reassess associations between IGFBP-3 and prostate cancer risk and advanced prostate cancer using summary statistics from the PRACTICAL consortium (44,825 cases; 27,904 controls). Observational and MR analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between inactive vitamin D [25(OH)D] and IGFBP-3 using data from the ProtecT study (1,366 cases;1,071 controls) and summary statistics from the CHARGE consortium (n = 18,995).
RESULTS: The OR for prostate cancer per SD unit increase in circulating IGFBP-3 was 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.28]. The OR for advanced prostate cancer per SD unit increase in IGFBP-3 was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.07-1.40). Observationally, a SD increase in 25(OH)D was associated with a 0.1SD (95% CI, 0.05-0.14) increase in IGFBP-3. MR analyses found little evidence for a causal relationship between circulating 25(OH)D and IGFBP-3 in the circulation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided confirmatory evidence that IGFBP-3 is a risk factor for prostate cancer risk and progression. Observationally, there was evidence that 25(OH)D is associated with IGFBP-3, but MR analyses suggested that these findings were unlikely to be causal. Findings may be limited by the nature of instrumentation of 25(OH)D and IGFBP-3 and the utility of circulating measures. 25(OH)D appears unlikely to be causally related to IGFBP-3 in the circulation, however, our findings do not preclude causal associations at the tissue level. IMPACT: IGFBP-3 is a prostate cancer risk factor but 25(OH)D are unlikely to be causally related to IGFBP-3 in the circulation. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30072546      PMCID: PMC6837868          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  49 in total

1.  Associations of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D with prostate cancer diagnosis, stage and grade.

Authors:  Rebecca Gilbert; Chris Metcalfe; William D Fraser; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Identification of a functional vitamin D response element in the human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 promoter.

Authors:  Lihong Peng; Peter J Malloy; David Feldman
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2004-02-12

3.  A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data Reveals an Association between Circulating Levels of IGF-I and Prostate Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Timothy J Key; Naomi E Allen; Ruth C Travis; Paul N Appleby; Richard M Martin; Jeff M P Holly; Demetrius Albanes; Amanda Black; H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita; June M Chan; Chu Chen; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Michael B Cook; Mélanie Deschasaux; Jenny L Donovan; Luigi Ferrucci; Pilar Galan; Graham G Giles; Edward L Giovannucci; Marc J Gunter; Laurel A Habel; Freddie C Hamdy; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Serge Hercberg; Robert N Hoover; Joseph A M J L Janssen; Rudolf Kaaks; Tatsuhiko Kubo; Loic Le Marchand; E Jeffrey Metter; Kazuya Mikami; Joan K Morris; David E Neal; Marian L Neuhouser; Kotaro Ozasa; Domenico Palli; Elizabeth A Platz; Michael Pollak; Alison J Price; Monique J Roobol; Catherine Schaefer; Jeannette M Schenk; Gianluca Severi; Meir J Stampfer; Pär Stattin; Akiko Tamakoshi; Catherine M Tangen; Mathilde Touvier; Nicholas J Wald; Noel S Weiss; Regina G Ziegler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Re: "Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects".

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Frank Dudbridge; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Adam Butterworth; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 6.  Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Jacobs; Lindsay N Kohler; Andrew G Kunihiro; Peter W Jurutka
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Safety, Feasibility, and Biomarker Effects of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation Among Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  K D Crew; T Xiao; P S Thomas; M B Terry; M Maurer; K Kalinsky; S Feldman; L Brafman; S R Refice; D L Hershman
Journal:  Int J Food Sci Nutr Diet       Date:  2015-02-23

8.  Association of maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy with bone-mineral content in offspring: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Debbie A Lawlor; Andrew K Wills; Abigail Fraser; Adrian Sayers; William D Fraser; Jonathan H Tobias
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators.

Authors:  Brandon L Pierce; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; George Davey Smith; Philip C Haycock; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.135

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Causal Relationships Between Extrinsic Exposures and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Phenome-Wide Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Dongqing Gu; Mingshuang Tang; Yutong Wang; Huijie Cui; Min Zhang; Ye Bai; Ziqian Zeng; Yunhua Tan; Xin Wang; Ben Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Genome-wide Association Study for Vitamin D Levels Reveals 69 Independent Loci.

Authors:  Despoina Manousaki; Ruth Mitchell; Tom Dudding; Simon Haworth; Adil Harroud; Vincenzo Forgetta; Rupal L Shah; Jian'an Luan; Claudia Langenberg; Nicholas J Timpson; J Brent Richards
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Markozannes; Afroditi Kanellopoulou; Olympia Dimopoulou; Dimitrios Kosmidis; Xiaomeng Zhang; Lijuan Wang; Evropi Theodoratou; Dipender Gill; Stephen Burgess; Konstantinos K Tsilidis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 11.150

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.