Jialin Liang1, Huan Cai2, Ganxiong Liang3, Zhonghua Liu2, Liang Fang2, Baile Zhu1, Baoying Liu1, Hao Zhang4. 1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 East Sunwen Road, Zhongshan, 528403, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Rehabilitation, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 East Sunwen Road, Zhongshan, 528403, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 East Sunwen Road, Zhongshan, 528403, Guangdong, China. ganxiong_liang@126.com. 4. Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China. zh_hao_neurol@163.com.
Abstract
AIMS: Observational studies have reported a negative association between educational attainment and type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the causality remains largely unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential causal effect of educational attainment on T2D and whether such an effect is independent of cognitive performance. METHODS: We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genetic variants strongly associated with educational attainment and cognitive performance to estimate the causal associations with T2D, among 61,714 T2D cases and 593,952 controls. We also performed multivariable MR to explore the independent effects of educational attainment and cognitive performance on T2D risk. RESULTS: In univariable MR, we found evidence that genetically predicted higher educational attainment [odds ratio (OR) 0.53 per 1-standard deviation (SD) increase; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.60] and cognitive performance (OR 0.79 per 1-SD increase; 95%CI 0.69-0.91) were related to decreased risk of T2D. Our further multivariable MR results suggested that more years of education led to a reduced likelihood of T2D independently of cognitive performance (OR 0.52; 95%CI 0.42-0.64). However, the protective effect of cognitive performance on T2D was attenuated once educational attainment was controlled for (OR 1.08; 95%CI 0.88-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: We provided evidence to suggest that educational attainment protects against T2D independently of cognitive performance, but does not support a negative causal association between cognitive performance and T2D independently of educational attainment. Education might represent a potential target for intervention to battle type 2 diabetes risk.
AIMS: Observational studies have reported a negative association between educational attainment and type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the causality remains largely unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential causal effect of educational attainment on T2D and whether such an effect is independent of cognitive performance. METHODS: We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genetic variants strongly associated with educational attainment and cognitive performance to estimate the causal associations with T2D, among 61,714 T2D cases and 593,952 controls. We also performed multivariable MR to explore the independent effects of educational attainment and cognitive performance on T2D risk. RESULTS: In univariable MR, we found evidence that genetically predicted higher educational attainment [odds ratio (OR) 0.53 per 1-standard deviation (SD) increase; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.60] and cognitive performance (OR 0.79 per 1-SD increase; 95%CI 0.69-0.91) were related to decreased risk of T2D. Our further multivariable MR results suggested that more years of education led to a reduced likelihood of T2D independently of cognitive performance (OR 0.52; 95%CI 0.42-0.64). However, the protective effect of cognitive performance on T2D was attenuated once educational attainment was controlled for (OR 1.08; 95%CI 0.88-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: We provided evidence to suggest that educational attainment protects against T2D independently of cognitive performance, but does not support a negative causal association between cognitive performance and T2D independently of educational attainment. Education might represent a potential target for intervention to battle type 2 diabetes risk.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognition; Education; Mendelian randomization; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: Angli Xue; Yang Wu; Zhihong Zhu; Futao Zhang; Kathryn E Kemper; Zhili Zheng; Loic Yengo; Luke R Lloyd-Jones; Julia Sidorenko; Yeda Wu; Allan F McRae; Peter M Visscher; Jian Zeng; Jian Yang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: James J Lee; Robbee Wedow; Aysu Okbay; Edward Kong; Omeed Maghzian; Meghan Zacher; Tuan Anh Nguyen-Viet; Peter Bowers; Julia Sidorenko; Richard Karlsson Linnér; Mark Alan Fontana; Tushar Kundu; Chanwook Lee; Hui Li; Ruoxi Li; Rebecca Royer; Pascal N Timshel; Raymond K Walters; Emily A Willoughby; Loïc Yengo; Maris Alver; Yanchun Bao; David W Clark; Felix R Day; Nicholas A Furlotte; Peter K Joshi; Kathryn E Kemper; Aaron Kleinman; Claudia Langenberg; Reedik Mägi; Joey W Trampush; Shefali Setia Verma; Yang Wu; Max Lam; Jing Hua Zhao; Zhili Zheng; Jason D Boardman; Harry Campbell; Jeremy Freese; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Caroline Hayward; Pamela Herd; Meena Kumari; Todd Lencz; Jian'an Luan; Anil K Malhotra; Andres Metspalu; Lili Milani; Ken K Ong; John R B Perry; David J Porteous; Marylyn D Ritchie; Melissa C Smart; Blair H Smith; Joyce Y Tung; Nicholas J Wareham; James F Wilson; Jonathan P Beauchamp; Dalton C Conley; Tõnu Esko; Steven F Lehrer; Patrik K E Magnusson; Sven Oskarsson; Tune H Pers; Matthew R Robinson; Kevin Thom; Chelsea Watson; Christopher F Chabris; Michelle N Meyer; David I Laibson; Jian Yang; Magnus Johannesson; Philipp D Koellinger; Patrick Turley; Peter M Visscher; Daniel J Benjamin; David Cesarini Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: J W Trampush; M L Z Yang; J Yu; E Knowles; G Davies; D C Liewald; J M Starr; S Djurovic; I Melle; K Sundet; A Christoforou; I Reinvang; P DeRosse; A J Lundervold; V M Steen; T Espeseth; K Räikkönen; E Widen; A Palotie; J G Eriksson; I Giegling; B Konte; P Roussos; S Giakoumaki; K E Burdick; A Payton; W Ollier; M Horan; O Chiba-Falek; D K Attix; A C Need; E T Cirulli; A N Voineskos; N C Stefanis; D Avramopoulos; A Hatzimanolis; D E Arking; N Smyrnis; R M Bilder; N A Freimer; T D Cannon; E London; R A Poldrack; F W Sabb; E Congdon; E D Conley; M A Scult; D Dickinson; R E Straub; G Donohoe; D Morris; A Corvin; M Gill; A R Hariri; D R Weinberger; N Pendleton; P Bitsios; D Rujescu; J Lahti; S Le Hellard; M C Keller; O A Andreassen; I J Deary; D C Glahn; A K Malhotra; T Lencz Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 13.437
Authors: Emma L Anderson; Rebecca C Richmond; Samuel E Jones; Gibran Hemani; Kaitlin H Wade; Hassan S Dashti; Jacqueline M Lane; Heming Wang; Richa Saxena; Ben Brumpton; Roxanna Korologou-Linden; Jonas B Nielsen; Bjørn Olav Åsvold; Gonçalo Abecasis; Elizabeth Coulthard; Simon D Kyle; Robin N Beaumont; Jessica Tyrrell; Timothy M Frayling; Marcus R Munafò; Andrew R Wood; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Laura D Howe; Deborah A Lawlor; Michael N Weedon; George Davey Smith Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Sandra G Sosa-Rubí; Jacqueline A Seiglie; Carlos Chivardi; Jennifer Manne-Goehler; James B Meigs; Deborah J Wexler; Veronika J Wirtz; Octavio Gómez-Dantés; Edson Serván-Mori Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Jia Zhang; Zekai Chen; Katri Pärna; Sander K R van Zon; Harold Snieder; Chris H L Thio Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 10.460