Literature DB >> 24158696

24-hour intraocular pressure rhythm in young healthy subjects evaluated with continuous monitoring using a contact lens sensor.

Benjamin Mottet1, Florent Aptel1, Jean-Paul Romanet2, Ralitsa Hubanova2, Jean-Louis Pépin3, Christophe Chiquet1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: This study evaluates a new device that has been proposed to continuously monitor intraocular pressure (IOP) over 24 hours.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 24-hour IOP rhythm reproducibility during repeated continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring with noncontact tonometry (NCT) and a contact lens sensor (CLS) in healthy participants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 12 young healthy volunteers at a referral center of chronobiology.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were housed in a sleep laboratory and underwent four 24-hour sessions of IOP measurements over a 6-month period. After initial randomized attribution, the IOP of the first eye was continuously monitored using a CLS and the IOP of the fellow eye was measured hourly using NCT. Two sessions with NCT measurements in 1 eye and CLS measurements in the fellow eye, 1 session with CLS measurements in only 1 eye, and 1 session with NCT measurements in both eyes were performed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A nonlinear least squares, dual-harmonic regression analysis was used to model the 24-hour IOP rhythm. Comparison of acrophase, bathyphase, amplitude, midline estimating statistic of rhythm, IOP values, IOP changes, and agreement were evaluated in the 3 tonometry methods.
RESULTS: A significant nyctohemeral IOP rhythm was found in 31 of 36 sessions (86%) using NCT and in all sessions (100%) using CLS. Hourly awakening during NCT IOP measurements did not significantly change the mean phases of the 24-hour IOP pattern evaluated using CLS in the contralateral eye. Throughout the sessions, intraclass correlation coefficients of the CLS acrophase (0.6 [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.9]; P = .03), CLS bathyphase (0.7 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = .01), NCT amplitude (0.7 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = .01), and NCT midline estimating statistic of rhythm (0.9 [95% CI, 0.9 to 1.0]; P < .01) were significant. When performing NCT measurements in 1 eye and CLS measurements in the contralateral eye, the IOP change at each point normalized from the first measurement (9 am) was not symmetric individually or within the population. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CLS is an accurate and reproducible method to characterize the nyctohemeral IOP rhythm in healthy participants but does not allow for estimating the IOP value in millimeters of mercury corresponding to the relative variation of the electrical signal measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24158696     DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  30 in total

1.  Effect of glaucoma medications on 24-hour intraocular pressure-related patterns using a contact lens sensor.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Why Do People (Still) Go Blind from Glaucoma?

Authors:  Remo Susanna; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Improvement of fluctuations of intraocular pressure after cataract surgery in primary angle closure glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Naoki Tojo; Mitsuya Otsuka; Akio Miyakoshi; Kazuya Fujita; Atsushi Hayashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  GPR158 in the Visual System: Homeostatic Role in Regulation of Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Tatsuo Itakura; Andrew Webster; Shravan K Chintala; Yuchen Wang; Jose M Gonzalez; J C Tan; Janice A Vranka; Ted Acott; Cheryl Mae Craft; Maria E Sibug Saber; Shinwu Jeong; W Daniel Stamer; Kirill A Martemyanov; M Elizabeth Fini
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Transient changes in refractive error and corneal tomography after 24-h continuous monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor.

Authors:  Atsuya Miki; Miho Kumoi; Naoyuki Maeda; Shizuka Koh; Kenji Matsushita; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Concordance of 24-h intraocular pressure curve in patients with untreated unilateral primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Zhongjing Lin; Shouyue Huang; Ping Huang; Changwei Li; Zhenghua Chen; Yisheng Zhong
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 7.  IOP telemetry in the nonhuman primate.

Authors:  J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  IOP, IOP Transient Impulse, Ocular Perfusion Pressure, and Mean Arterial Pressure Relationships in Nonhuman Primates Instrumented With Telemetry.

Authors:  John E Markert; Jessica V Jasien; Daniel C Turner; Carrie Huisingh; Christopher A Girkin; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Nocturnal Variability of Intraocular Pressure Monitored With Contact Lens Sensor Is Associated With Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Kaweh Mansouri; Sasan Moghimi; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.290

10.  Efficacy of a contact lens sensor for monitoring 24-h intraocular pressure related patterns.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Robert N Weinreb; John H K Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.