Literature DB >> 24158343

A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level.

M-I Lin1, Y-W Shen, H-L Huang, J-T Hsu, L-J Fuh.   

Abstract

This study compared the effects of external hex, internal octagon, and internal Morse taper implant-abutment connections on the peri-implant bone level before and after the occlusal loading of dental implants. Periapical radiographs of 103 implants (63 patients) placed between 2002 and 2010 were collected, digitized, standardized, and classified into groups based on the type of implant-abutment connection. These radiographs were then analyzed with image-processing software to measure the peri-implant crestal bone change during the healing phase (4 months after implant placement) and at loading phases 1 and 2 (3 and 6 months after occlusal loading, respectively). A generalized estimating equation method was employed for statistical analysis. The amount of peri-implant crestal bone change differed significantly among all time-phase pairs for all 3 types of implant-abutment connection, being greater in the healing phase than in loading phase 1 or 2. However, the peri-implant crestal bone change did not differ significantly among the 3 types of implant-abutment connections during the healing phase, loading phase 1, or loading phase 2. This retrospective clinical study reveals that the design of the implant-abutment connection appears to have no significant impact on short-term peri-implant crestal bone change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alveolar bone loss; internal Morse taper; internal octagon; peri-implant crestal bone change dental implant–abutment design; radiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24158343      PMCID: PMC3860058          DOI: 10.1177/0022034513510322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  29 in total

1.  Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 2: A methodical study using five types of attachment.

Authors:  S M Heckmann; W Winter; M Meyer; H P Weber; M G Wichmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants.

Authors:  J S Hermann; D Buser; R K Schenk; J D Schoolfield; D L Cochran
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  Daniel Buser; Sigurgísli Ingimarsson; Karl Dula; Adrian Lussi; Hans Peter Hirt; Urs C Belser
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions.

Authors:  Per Astrand; Bo Engquist; Simon Dahlgren; Kerstin Gröndahl; Eva Engquist; Hartmut Feldmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Marginal bone levels at Brånemark system implants used for single tooth restoration. The influence of implant design and anatomical region.

Authors:  C Malevez; M Hermans; P Daelemans
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants.

Authors:  Bo Engquist; Per Astrand; Simon Dahlgren; Eva Engquist; Hartmut Feldmann; Kerstin Gröndahl
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 9.  The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science?

Authors:  Tae-Ju Oh; Joongkyo Yoon; Carl E Misch; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system.

Authors:  M Quirynen; I Naert; D van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

2.  Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Niloufar Mousavi; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Microbiological Sealing Analysis of a Tapered Connection and External Hexagon System.

Authors:  Gardel Nepomuceno Costa; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez; Aluísio Martins de Oliveira Ruellas; Daiane Cristina Peruzzo; Júlio Cesar Joly; Marcelo Henrique Napimoga
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-02-28

4.  Influence of Connection Type and Platform Diameter on Titanium Dental Implants Fatigue: Non-Axial Loading Cyclic Test Analysis.

Authors:  Ana I Nicolas-Silvente; Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; Ivan Ortiz-Garcia; Alvaro Jimenez-Guerra; Loreto Monsalve-Guil; Raul Ayuso-Montero; Javier Gil; Jose Lopez-Lopez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Crestal Bone Changes in Different Implants Designs: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gustavo M Caetano; Patrícia Pauletto; Luis A Mezzomo; Elken G Rivaldo
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31

6.  Long-Term Comparison of Survival and Marginal Bone of Implants with and without Sinus Augmentation in Maxillary Molars within the Same Patients: A 5.8- to 22-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Won-Bae Park; Ji-Young Han; Kyung-Lhi Kang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.