Literature DB >> 15248875

Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions.

Per Astrand1, Bo Engquist, Simon Dahlgren, Kerstin Gröndahl, Eva Engquist, Hartmut Feldmann.   

Abstract

This paper describes the 5-year results of a comparative study between Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants. The aim was to compare the systems primarily with regard to bone level changes, and also with regard to other variables of interest. Sixty-six patients with edentulous jaws were included in the study. Randomisation schedules were used to allocate the patients to the two implant systems. 184 Astra Tech implants with a titanium-blasted surface and 187 Brånemark implants with a turned surface were used. The implants were inserted with a two-stage technique and the insertion followed the routines for the respective implant system. All patients were provided with full-arch fixed bridges. All patients were followed up with clinical and radiographic examinations from fixture insertion to the 5-year follow-up. The total mean bone level change in the upper jaw between fixture insertion and the 5-year examination was -1.74+/-0.45 mm at the Astra implants and -1.98+/-0.21 at the Brånemark implants. The corresponding values for the lower jaw were -1.06+/-0.19 for Astra and -1.38+/-0.17 for Brånemark. The major postoperative changes of the marginal bone level took place between fixture insertion and baseline. During this period, there was also a different pattern of bone remodelling between the implant systems. Between baseline (prosthesis connection) and the 5-year examination, the marginal bone level changes were small, with no difference between the implant systems. The implant stability was examined with the supraconstructions removed. At the 5-year examination, the survival rate for Astra Tech implants was 98.4% and for the Brånemark implants it was 94.6%. The difference was not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15248875     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01028.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  26 in total

1.  External versus internal abutment connection implants: a survey of opinions and decision making among experienced implant dentists in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Hagiwara; Alan B Carr
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level.

Authors:  M-I Lin; Y-W Shen; H-L Huang; J-T Hsu; L-J Fuh
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Prospective clinical evaluation of 201 direct laser metal forming implants: results from a 1-year multicenter study.

Authors:  Carlo Mangano; Francesco Mangano; Jamil Awad Shibli; Giuseppe Luongo; Michele De Franco; Francesco Briguglio; Michele Figliuzzi; Tammaro Eccellente; Carmine Rapani; Michele Piombino; Aldo Macchi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Influence of platform switching on bone-level alterations: a three-year randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  N Enkling; P Jöhren; J Katsoulis; S Bayer; P-M Jervøe-Storm; R Mericske-Stern; S Jepsen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 5.  How frequent does peri-implantitis occur? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mia Rakic; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Alberto Monje; Sandro Radovanovic; Hom-Lay Wang; David Cochran; Anton Sculean; Luigi Canullo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Reliability evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched versus laser-sintered dental implants.

Authors:  Erika O Almeida; Amilcar C Freitas Júnior; Estevam A Bonfante; Nelson R F A Silva; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Yasmin Ardebili; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-10

8.  Bone remodeling around dental implants after 1-1.5 years of functional loading: A retrospective analysis of two-stage implants.

Authors:  Poyan Maghsoudi; Dagmar E Slot; Fridus G A van der Weijden
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-15

9.  Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants.

Authors:  Sung-Wook Chae; Young-Sung Kim; Yong-Moo Lee; Won-Kyung Kim; Young-Kyoo Lee; Su-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

10.  A radiographic comparison of progressive and conventional loading on crestal bone loss and density in single dental implants: a randomized controlled trial study.

Authors:  Rahab Ghoveizi; Marzieh Alikhasi; Mohammad-Reza Siadat; Hakimeh Siadat; Majid Sorouri
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.