Literature DB >> 24158333

Influence of platform switching on bone-level alterations: a three-year randomized clinical trial.

N Enkling1, P Jöhren, J Katsoulis, S Bayer, P-M Jervøe-Storm, R Mericske-Stern, S Jepsen.   

Abstract

The concept of platform switching has been introduced to implant dentistry based on clinical observations of reduced peri-implant crestal bone loss. However, published data are controversial, and most studies are limited to 12 months. The aim of the present randomized clinical trial was to test the hypothesis that platform switching has a positive impact on crestal bone-level changes after 3 years. Two implants with a diameter of 4 mm were inserted crestally in the posterior mandible of 25 patients. The intraindividual allocation of platform switching (3.3-mm platform) and the standard implant (4-mm platform) was randomized. After 3 months of submerged healing, single-tooth crowns were cemented. Patients were followed up at short intervals for monitoring of healing and oral hygiene. Statistical analysis for the influence of time and platform type on bone levels employed the Brunner-Langer model. At 3 years, the mean radiographic peri-implant bone loss was 0.69 ± 0.43 mm (platform switching) and 0.74 ± 0.57 mm (standard platform). The mean intraindividual difference was 0.05 ± 0.58 mm (95% confidence interval: -0.19, 0.29). Crestal bone-level alteration depended on time (p < .001) but not on platform type (p = .363). The present randomized clinical trial could not confirm the hypothesis of a reduced peri-implant crestal bone loss, when implants had been restored according to the concept of platform switching.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alveolar bone loss; dental implant; dental implant-abutment connection; dental implant-abutment designs; dental implant-abutment interface; single-tooth dental implant

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24158333      PMCID: PMC3860064          DOI: 10.1177/0022034513504953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  29 in total

1.  The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach.

Authors:  S Hansson
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study.

Authors:  J Duyck; H J Rønold; H Van Oosterwyck; I Naert; J Vander Sloten; J E Ellingsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.

Authors:  E De Smet; R Jacobs; F Gijbels; I Naert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions.

Authors:  Per Astrand; Bo Engquist; Simon Dahlgren; Kerstin Gröndahl; Eva Engquist; Hartmut Feldmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels.

Authors:  Richard J Lazzara; Stephan S Porter
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up.

Authors:  Luigi Canullo; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in short-span partial denture situations.

Authors:  Kyle Trammell; Nico C Geurs; S Jean O'Neal; Perng-Ru Liu; Sandra J Haigh; Sandre McNeal; James N Kenealy; Michael S Reddy
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year.

Authors:  Young-Kyu Shin; Chong-Hyun Han; Seong-Joo Heo; Sunjai Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption.

Authors:  Xavier Vela-Nebot; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Carlos Rodado-Alonso; Maribel Segalà-Torres
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.454

10.  Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues.

Authors:  I Ericsson; L G Persson; T Berglundh; C P Marinello; J Lindhe; B Klinge
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 8.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  Investigational clinical research in implant dentistry: beyond observational and descriptive studies.

Authors:  T Berglundh; W V Giannobile
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  M DI Girolamo; R Calcaterra; R DI Gianfilippo; C Arcuri; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

3.  Short strategic implants for mandibular removable partial dentures: One-year results from a pilot randomized crossover abutment type study.

Authors:  Norbert Enkling; Joël Nauli; Dominik Kraus; Julia Gabriela Wittneben; Martin Schimmel; Samir Abou-Ayash
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.021

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.