Literature DB >> 29204810

High-Risk Palliative Care Patients' Knowledge and Attitudes about Hereditary Cancer Testing and DNA Banking.

John M Quillin1, Oluwabunmi Emidio2, Brittany Ma3, Lauryn Bailey3, Thomas J Smith4, In Guk Kang3, Brandon J Yu5, Oluwafemi Patrick Owodunni3, Mohammed Abusamaan6, Rab Razzak4, Joann N Bodurtha2.   

Abstract

Even at the end of life, testing cancer patients for inherited susceptibility may provide life-saving information to their relatives. Prior research suggests palliative care inpatients have suboptimal understanding of genetic importance, and testing may be underutilized in this clinical setting. These conclusions are based on limited research. This study aimed to estimate genetic testing prevalence among high-risk palliative care patients in a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. We also aimed to understand these patients' understanding of, and attitudes toward, hereditary cancer testing and DNA banking. Palliative care in-patients with cancer completed structured interviews, and their medical records were reviewed. Among patients at high risk for hereditary cancer, we assessed history of genetic testing/DNA banking; and related knowledge and attitudes. Among 24 high-risk patients, 14 (58.3%) said they/their relatives had genetic testing or they had been referred for a genetics consultation. Of the remaining 10 patients, seven (70%) said they would "probably" or "definitely" get tested. Patients who had not had testing were least concerned about the impact of future testing on their family relationships; two (20%) said they were "extremely concerned" about privacy related to genetic testing. Of patients without prior testing, five (50%) said they had heard or read "a fair amount" about genetic testing. No high-risk patients had banked DNA. Overall, 23 (95.8%) said they had heard or read "almost nothing" or "relatively little" about DNA banking. Written materials and clinician discussion were most preferred ways to learn about genetic testing and DNA banking. Overall, this study demonstrates underutilization of genetics services at the end of life continues to be problematic, despite high patient interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; DNA banking; End of life; Genetic testing; Palliative care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29204810     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0181-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  27 in total

1.  Physicians' current practices and opportunities for DNA banking of dying patients with cancer.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Joann N Bodurtha; Laura A Siminoff; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Impact of Clinical Genetics Attendance at a Gynecologic Oncology Tumor Board on Referrals for Genetic Counseling and BRCA Mutation Testing.

Authors:  Paul A Cohen; Cassandra B Nichols; Lyn Schofield; Steven Van Der Werf; Nicholas Pachter
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Robert T Croyle; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005 Dec 12-26

4.  Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Bronson D Riley; Julie O Culver; Cécile Skrzynia; Leigha A Senter; June A Peters; Josephine W Costalas; Faith Callif-Daley; Sherry C Grumet; Katherine S Hunt; Rebecca S Nagy; Wendy C McKinnon; Nancie M Petrucelli; Robin L Bennett; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The value of a genetic counselor: improving identification of cancer genetic counseling patients with chart review.

Authors:  Jennifer N Eichmeyer; Christa Burnham; Patty Sproat; Rick Tivis; Thomas M Beck
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Awareness and preferences regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing among Latinas and non-Latina white women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Dawn Gammon; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Simmons; Jan T Lowery; Lori Ballinger; Deirdre A Hill; Kenneth M Boucher; Anita Yeomans Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Prompting Primary Care Providers about Increased Patient Risk As a Result of Family History: Does It Work?

Authors:  Philip Zazove; Melissa A Plegue; Wendy R Uhlmann; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  The Angelina effect: immediate reach, grasp, and impact of going public.

Authors:  Dina L G Borzekowski; Yue Guan; Katherine C Smith; Lori H Erby; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; Julian Barwell; Diana M Eccles; Amanda Collins; Louise Izatt; Chris Jacobs; Alan Donaldson; Angela F Brady; Andrew Cuthbert; Rachel Harrison; Sue Thomas; Anthony Howell; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Alex Murray
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Assessment of knowledge about biobanking among healthcare students and their willingness to donate biospecimens.

Authors:  Leena Merdad; Lama Aldakhil; Rawan Gadi; Mourad Assidi; Salina Y Saddick; Adel Abuzenadah; Jim Vaught; Abdelbaset Buhmeida; Mohammed H Al-Qahtani
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  5 in total

1.  Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on.

Authors:  Samuel J Huang; Laura M Amendola; Darci L Sternen
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-07-14

2.  Views and experiences of palliative care clinicians in addressing genetics with individuals and families: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Stephanie White; Jane Phillips; Erin Turbitt; Chris Jacobs
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  What do cancer patients' relatives think about addressing cancer family history and performing genetic testing in palliative care?

Authors:  Jude E Cléophat; Ana Marin; Sylvie Pelletier; Yann Joly; Pierre Gagnon; Alberte Déry; Jocelyne Chiquette; Bruno Gagnon; Louis Roy; Vasiliki Bitzas; Hermann Nabi; Michel Dorval
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Approaching discussions about genetics with palliative patients and their families: a qualitative exploration with genetic health professionals.

Authors:  Stephanie White; Erin Turbitt; Jane L Phillips; Chris Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.351

5.  Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA.

Authors:  Joshua Prudent; Esthermarie Lopez; Donna Dorshorst; Hannah C Cox; Joann N Bodurtha
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-06-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.