Literature DB >> 24154803

A systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures.

L Si1, T M Winzenberg, A J Palmer.   

Abstract

This review was aimed at the evolution of health economic models used in evaluations of clinical approaches aimed at preventing osteoporotic fractures. Models have improved, with medical continuance becoming increasingly recognized as a contributor to health and economic outcomes, as well as advancements in epidemiological data. Model-based health economic evaluation studies are increasingly used to investigate the cost-effectiveness of osteoporotic fracture preventions and treatments. The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the evolution of health economic models used in the evaluation of osteoporotic fracture preventions. Electronic searches within MEDLINE and EMBASE were carried out using a predefined search strategy. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select relevant studies. References listed of included studies were searched to identify any potential study that was not captured in our electronic search. Data on country, interventions, type of fracture prevention, evaluation perspective, type of model, time horizon, fracture sites, expressed costs, types of costs included, and effectiveness measurement were extracted. Seventy-four models were described in 104 publications, of which 69% were European. Earlier models focused mainly on hip, vertebral, and wrist fracture, but later models included multiple fracture sites (humerus, pelvis, tibia, and other fractures). Modeling techniques have evolved from simple decision trees, through deterministic Markov processes to individual patient simulation models accounting for uncertainty in multiple parameters. Treatment continuance has been increasingly taken into account in the models in the last decade. Models have evolved in their complexity and emphasis, with medical continuance becoming increasingly recognized as a contributor to health and economic outcomes. This evolution may be driven in part by the desire to capture all the important differentiating characteristics of medications under scrutiny, as well as the advancement in epidemiological data relevant to osteoporosis fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24154803     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2551-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  91 in total

1.  Effect and offset of effect of treatments for hip fracture on health outcomes.

Authors:  B Jonsson; J Kanis; A Dawson; A Oden; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Reporting format for economic evaluation. Part II: Focus on modelling studies.

Authors:  M J Nuijten; M H Pronk; M J Brorens; Y A Hekster; J H Lockefeer; P A de Smet; G Bonsel; A van der Kuy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The clinical and economic burden of non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Véronique Rabenda; Olivier Bruyère; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life.

Authors:  M J Buxton; M F Drummond; B A Van Hout; R L Prince; T A Sheldon; T Szucs; M Vray
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Toward a peer review process for medical decision analysis models.

Authors:  F A Sonnenberg; M S Roberts; J Tsevat; J B Wong; M Barry; D L Kent
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Clinic visits and hospital admissions for care of acid-related upper gastrointestinal disorders in women using alendronate for osteoporosis.

Authors:  B Ettinger; A Pressman; J Schein
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women in 9 European countries--an economic evaluation based on the fracture intervention trial.

Authors:  O Ström; F Borgström; S S Sen; S Boonen; P Haentjens; O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Stevenson; S Davis; M Lloyd-Jones; C Beverley
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  The components of excess mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; C De Laet; B Jonsson; A K Oglesby
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Economic evaluation of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J Lundkvist; O Johnell; C Cooper; D Sykes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  21 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision.

Authors:  J H E Yong; L Masucci; J S Hoch; R Sujic; D Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Orthogeriatric and Fracture Liaison Service Models of Care for Hip Fracture Patients: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jose Leal; Alastair M Gray; Samuel Hawley; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Antonella Delmestri; Nigel K Arden; Cyrus Cooper; M Kassim Javaid; Andrew Judge
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan.

Authors:  T Mori; C J Crandall; D A Ganz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life for osteoporosis-related conditions.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; B de Graaff; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Screening for and treatment of osteoporosis: construction and validation of a state-transition microsimulation cost-effectiveness model.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; Q Jiang; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Silvia M Evers; Wafa Ben Sedrine; John A Kanis; Bram Ramaekers; Jean-Yves Reginster; Stuart Silverman; Caroline E Wyers; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Effects of Milk and Dairy Products on the Prevention of Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fractures in Europeans and Non-Hispanic Whites from North America: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pilar Matía-Martín; Macarena Torrego-Ellacuría; Angélica Larrad-Sainz; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Federico Cuesta-Triana; Miguel Ángel Rubio-Herrera
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China: 2010-2050.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; Q Jiang; M Chen; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Screening for osteoporosis in Chinese post-menopausal women: a health economic modelling study.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; M Chen; Q Jiang; A Neil; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The predicted lifetime costs and health consequences of calcium and vitamin D supplementation for fracture prevention-the impact of cardiovascular effects.

Authors:  G Hagen; T Wisløff; I S Kristiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.