Literature DB >> 16027955

Economic evaluation of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

J Lundkvist1, O Johnell, C Cooper, D Sykes.   

Abstract

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a new treatment for osteoporosis and has been shown to reduce the risks of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women in clinical trials. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of teriparatide in addition to calcium and vitamin D, using a simulation model. The base case analysis was conducted for a cohort of 69-year-old women in Sweden who had at least one previous vertebral fracture and low bone mineral density. The model simulated the course of events in 6-month cycles in individual patients until death or 100 years of age. During each cycle the patients were at risk of experiencing clinical vertebral, hip or wrist fractures, or death. Total accumulated life-time costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. Swedish data on fracture costs, utility reductions after fracture, fracture risks and mortality rates were used. The model incorporated new epidemiological evidence that indicates fracture risks and mortality rates are higher in the subsequent years post-fracture. The results showed that the cost-effectiveness of the treatment is highly dependant on the risk profile of the treated patients and the timing of starting treatment relative to previous fractures. The cost per QALY gained for treatment of a population of 69-year-olds with a T-score at the femoral neck of -3 was in the base case estimated to be between EUR (euro) 20,000 and 64,000 for patients with a recent or historic vertebral fracture respectively. The study provides further evidence of the benefit and cost-effectiveness of starting osteoporotic treatments early in patients with a new fracture, and also that teriparatide may provide valuable clinical benefits for these patients and may be considered a cost-effective intervention when targeted to the appropriate patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16027955     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1959-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  35 in total

1.  The practicality and validity of directly elicited and SF-36 derived health state preferences in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  William Hollingworth; Richard A Deyo; Sean D Sullivan; Scott S Emerson; Darryl T Gray; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Accounting for future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  D Meltzer
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  S E Hall; R A Criddle; T L Comito; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  [Cost-effectiveness of bisoprolol in chronic heart failure].

Authors:  Mattias Ekman; Niklas Zethraeus; Ulf Dahlström; Christer Höglund
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2002-02-14

6.  The cost of a hip fracture. Estimates for 1,709 patients in Sweden.

Authors:  N Zethraeus; L Strömberg; B Jönsson; O Svensson; G Ohlén
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-02

7.  Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; B Jonsson; C De Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Mortality after osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis; A Odén; I Sernbo; I Redlund-Johnell; C Petterson; C De Laet; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The components of excess mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; C De Laet; B Jonsson; A K Oglesby
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Hip fractures: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  13 in total

1.  Using common random numbers in health care cost-effectiveness simulation modeling.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Robert W Klein; Lee J Smolen; Timothy M Klein; Stephen D Roberts
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Patient profile in a bone health and osteoporosis prevention service in Ireland.

Authors:  B McGowan; K Bennett; J Marry; J B Walsh; M C Casey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  A systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Hospitalisations for fracture and associated costs between 2000 and 2009 in Ireland: a trend analysis.

Authors:  B McGowan; M C Casey; C Silke; B Whelan; K Bennett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Effects of parathyroid hormone alone or in combination with antiresorptive therapy on bone mineral density and fracture risk--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Vestergaard; N R Jorgensen; L Mosekilde; P Schwarz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness modeling research of pharmacologic therapy to prevent osteoporosis-related fractures.

Authors:  John T Schousboe
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis--a review of the literature and a reference model.

Authors:  N Zethraeus; F Borgström; O Ström; J A Kanis; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Clinical update on teriparatide.

Authors:  Elizabeth File; Chad Deal
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  Teriparatide: a review of its use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stephanie K A Blick; Sohita Dhillon; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Lee J Smolen; Timothy M Klein; Robert W Klein
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.