Literature DB >> 20153543

The clinical and economic burden of non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients.

Mickaël Hiligsmann1, Véronique Rabenda, Olivier Bruyère, Jean-Yves Reginster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to estimate the clinical and economic burden of non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients and the potential cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions.
METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation model estimated costs and outcomes (i.e. the number of fractures and the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)) for three adherence scenarios: no treatment, real-world adherence and full adherence over 3 years. The real-world adherence scenario employed data from a published observational study. The incremental cost per QALY gained was estimated and compared across the three adherence scenarios.
RESULTS: The number of fractures prevented and the QALY gain obtained at real-world adherence levels represented only 38.2% and 40.7% of those expected with full adherence, respectively. The cost per QALY gained of real-world adherence compared with no treatment was estimated at euro 10279, and full adherence was found to be cost-saving compared with real-world adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that more than half of the potential clinical benefits from oral bisphosphonates in patients with osteoporosis are lost due to poor adherence with treatment. Depending on their cost, interventions with improved adherence to therapy have the potential to be an attractive use of resources. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153543     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  23 in total

1.  Screening for and treatment of osteoporosis: construction and validation of a state-transition microsimulation cost-effectiveness model.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; Q Jiang; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; M Salas; D A Hughes; E Manias; F H Gwadry-Sridhar; P Linck; W Cowell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Proactive pharmaceutical care interventions decrease patients' nonadherence to osteoporosis medication.

Authors:  A G G Stuurman-Bieze; E G Hiddink; J F M van Boven; S Vegter
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  A systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the United States: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jerry L Grenard; Brett A Munjas; John L Adams; Marika Suttorp; Margaret Maglione; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Walid F Gellad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Cost effectiveness of denosumab compared with oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporotic women in Belgium.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Patients' preferences for anti-osteoporosis drug treatment: a cross-European discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Benedict G Dellaert; Carmen D Dirksen; Verity Watson; Sandrine Bours; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Yves Reginster; Christian Roux; Bernie McGowan; Carmel Silke; Bryan Whelan; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Elisa Torres; Georgios Papadakis; Rene Rizzoli; Cyrus Cooper; Gill Pearson; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Comparison of prescribing and adherence patterns of anti-osteoporotic medications post-admission for fragility type fracture in an urban teaching hospital and a rural teaching hospital in Ireland between 2005 and 2008.

Authors:  B McGowan; K Bennett; M C Casey; J Doherty; C Silke; B Whelan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Screening for osteoporosis in Chinese post-menopausal women: a health economic modelling study.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; M Chen; Q Jiang; A Neil; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Persistence with osteoporosis medication among newly-treated osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  Job F M van Boven; Pieter T de Boer; Maarten J Postma; Stefan Vegter
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.