Literature DB >> 24150067

Alteration of muscle function after electrical stimulation bout of knee extensors and flexors.

Marc Vanderthommen1, Mylène Triffaux, Christophe Demoulin, Jean-Michel Crielaard, Jean-Louis Croisier.   

Abstract

The purpose was to study the effects on muscle function of an electrical stimulation bout applied unilaterally on thigh muscles in healthy male volunteers. One group (ES group, n = 10) received consecutively 100 isometric contractions of quadriceps and 100 isometric contractions of hamstrings (on-off ratio 6-6 s) induced by neuromuscular electrical stimulations (NMES). Changes in muscle torque, muscle soreness (0-10 VAS), muscle stiffness and serum creatine kinase (CK) activity were assessed before the NMES exercise (pre-ex) as well as 24h (d+1), 48h (d+2) and 120h (d+5) after the bout. A second group (control group, n = 10) were submitted to the same test battery than the ES group and with the same time-frame. The between-group comparison indicated a significant increase in VAS scores and in serum levels of CK only in the ES group. In the ES group, changes were more pronounced in hamstrings than in quadriceps and peaked at d+2 (quadriceps VAS scores = 2.20 ± 1.55 a.u. (0 at pre-ex); hamstrings VAS scores = 3.15 ± 2.14 a.u. (0 at pre-ex); hip flexion angle = 62 ± 5° (75 ± 6° at pre-ex); CK activity = 3021 ± 2693 IU·l(-1) (136 ± 50 IU·l(-1) at pre-ex)). The results of the present study suggested the occurrence of muscle damage that could have been induced by the peculiar muscle recruitment in NMES and the resulting overrated mechanical stress. The sensitivity to the damaging effects of NMES appeared higher in the hamstrings than in quadriceps muscles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DOMS; Electrical stimulation; muscle contraction; muscle damage

Year:  2012        PMID: 24150067      PMCID: PMC3763303     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  23 in total

Review 1.  Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Leon Bax; Filip Staes; Arianne Verhagen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation superimposed onto voluntary muscular contraction.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard; Frédéric Noé; Philippe Passelergue; Philippe Dupui
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Damage to skeletal muscle from eccentric exercise.

Authors:  Uwe Proske; Trevor J Allen
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.230

4.  Open-loop position control of the knee joint using electrical stimulation of the quadriceps and hamstrings.

Authors:  J M Hausdorff; W K Durfee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Less indication of muscle damage in the second than initial electrical muscle stimulation bout consisting of isometric contractions of the knee extensors.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Michael R McGuigan; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Electrical stimulation as a modality to improve performance of the neuromuscular system.

Authors:  Marc Vanderthommen; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.230

7.  Evidence of skeletal muscle damage following electrically stimulated isometric muscle contractions in humans.

Authors:  Abigail L Mackey; Jens Bojsen-Moller; Klaus Qvortrup; Henning Langberg; Charlotte Suetta; Kari K Kalliokoski; Michael Kjaer; S Peter Magnusson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-09-18

8.  Experimental human muscle damage: morphological changes in relation to other indices of damage.

Authors:  D A Jones; D J Newham; J M Round; S E Tolfree
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Histochemical correlates of hamstring injuries.

Authors:  W E Garrett; J C Califf; F H Bassett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Myofibre damage in human skeletal muscle: effects of electrical stimulation versus voluntary contraction.

Authors:  R M Crameri; P Aagaard; K Qvortrup; H Langberg; J Olesen; M Kjaer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  5 in total

1.  Influence of patterned electrical neuromuscular stimulation on quadriceps activation in individuals with knee joint injury.

Authors:  Neal R Glaviano; William T Langston; Joseph M Hart; Susan Saliba
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-12

2.  The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength and knee function in professional soccer players: return to sport after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  J Taradaj; T Halski; M Kucharzewski; K Walewicz; A Smykla; M Ozon; L Slupska; R Dymarek; K Ptaszkowski; J Rajfur; M Pasternok
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces exercise-induced perceived pain and improves endurance exercise performance.

Authors:  Ali H Y Astokorki; Alexis R Mauger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Physical and physiological effectiveness of an overall health care program for middle-aged Japanese women with mild obesity: A pilot study.

Authors:  Sho Amano; Hirokazu Tsubone; Masakazu Hanafusa; Takeshi Yamasaki; Saiko Nishizaka; Hiroshi Yanagisawa
Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med       Date:  2015-01-22

Review 5.  Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening?

Authors:  Neal R Glaviano; Susan Saliba
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.843

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.