Literature DB >> 16271009

Electrical stimulation superimposed onto voluntary muscular contraction.

Thierry Paillard1, Frédéric Noé, Philippe Passelergue, Philippe Dupui.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation (ES) reverses the order of recruitment of motor units (MU) observed with voluntary muscular contraction (VOL) since under ES, large MU are recruited before small MU. The superimposition of ES onto VOL (superimposed technique: application of an electrical stimulus during a voluntary muscle action) can theoretically activate more motor units than VOL performed alone, which can engender an increase of the contraction force. Two superimposed techniques can be used: (i) the twitch interpolation technique (ITT), which consists of interjecting an electrical stimulus onto the muscle nerve; and (ii) the percutaneous superimposed electrical stimulation technique (PST), where the stimulation is applied to the muscle belly. These two superimposed techniques can be used to evaluate the ability to fully activate a muscle. They can thus be employed to distinguish the central or peripheral nature of fatigue after exhausting exercise. In general, whatever the technique employed, the superimposition of ES onto volitional exercise does not recruit more MU than VOL, except with eccentric actions. Nevertheless, the neuromuscular response associated with the use of the superimposed technique (ITT and PST) depends on the parameter of the superimposed current. The sex and the training level of the subjects can also modify the physiological impact of the superimposed technique. Although the motor control differs drastically between training with ES and VOL, the integration of the superimposed technique in training programmes with healthy subjects does not reveal significant benefits compared with programmes performed only with voluntary exercises. Nevertheless, in a therapeutic context, training programmes using ES superimposition compensate volume and muscle strength deficit with more efficiency than programmes using VOL or ES separately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16271009     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200535110-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  79 in total

1.  Comparison between three strength development methods on body composition in healthy elderly women.

Authors:  T Paillard; C Lafont; M C Costes-Salon; P Dupui
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Voluntary strength and fatigue.

Authors:  P A MERTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Comparison of voluntary and electrical stimulation contraction torques*.

Authors:  J F Kramer; D M Lindsay; D Magee; T Wall; S W Mendryk
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Twitch interpolation of the elbow flexor muscles at high forces.

Authors:  G M Allen; D K McKenzie; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Assessment of maximal voluntary contraction with twitch interpolation: an instrument to measure twitch responses.

Authors:  J P Hales; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Quantitation of central activation failure during maximal voluntary contractions in humans.

Authors:  J A Kent-Braun; R Le Blanc
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Motor-unit discharge rates in maximal voluntary contractions of three human muscles.

Authors:  F Bellemare; J J Woods; R Johansson; B Bigland-Ritchie
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Intermuscle differences in activation.

Authors:  D G Behm; J Whittle; D Button; K Power
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Human skeletal muscle function: description of tests and normal values.

Authors:  R H Edwards; A Young; G P Hosking; D A Jones
Journal:  Clin Sci Mol Med       Date:  1977-03
View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of electrostimulation and plyometric training program combination on jump height in teenage athletes.

Authors:  Emilio J Martínez-López; Elisa Benito-Martínez; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Amador Lara-Sánchez; Antonio Martínez-Amat
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Chronic effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on aerobic and anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  Sebastian Mathes; Niklas Lehnen; Tobias Link; Wilhelm Bloch; Joachim Mester; Patrick Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Quadriceps inhibition after repetitive lumbar extension exercise in persons with a history of low back pain.

Authors:  Joseph M Hart; Julie M Fritz; D Casey Kerrigan; Ethan N Saliba; Bruce M Gansneder; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Stimulated and voluntary fatiguing contractions of quadriceps femoris similarly disturb postural control in the bipedal stance.

Authors:  Vincent Chaubet; Julien Maitre; Bruno Cormery; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Alteration of muscle function after electrical stimulation bout of knee extensors and flexors.

Authors:  Marc Vanderthommen; Mylène Triffaux; Christophe Demoulin; Jean-Michel Crielaard; Jean-Louis Croisier
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Combined application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary muscular contractions.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Neural adaptations to electrical stimulation strength training.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Effects of combined application of progressive resistance training and Russian electrical stimulation on quadriceps femoris muscle strength in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Park; Gak Hwangbo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-03-31

10.  The influence of low-intensity resistance training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on autonomic activity in healthy adults: A randomized controlled cross-over trial.

Authors:  Toshiki Kutsuna; Hitoshi Sugawara; Hideaki Kurita; Satomi Kusaka; Tetsuya Takahashi
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2020-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.