Literature DB >> 15730336

Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Leon Bax1, Filip Staes, Arianne Verhagen.   

Abstract

Devices for neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are increasingly used by individuals without specific injuries and are standard equipment in most physical therapy practices. The most often stimulated muscle group is the quadriceps femoris. We designed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to determine whether NMES is an effective modality for strength augmentation of the quadriceps femoris. A full content search for randomised controlled trials was performed in Medline, Embase, Cinahl, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Physical Therapy Evidence Database. Maximum volitional isometric or isokinetic muscle torque in Nm was used as main outcome measure.Thirty-five trials were included and evaluated. A fundamental distinction was made between the trials using subjects with unimpaired quadriceps femoris muscles and the trials using post-injury or post-operative subjects. In the unimpaired quadriceps subgroup, meta-analyses were performed for the comparisons 'NMES versus no exercises' and 'NMES versus volitional exercises'. All other comparisons were evaluated descriptively. The included trials were generally of poor quality and meta-analytic data indicate that publication bias may be present. The evaluated data suggest that, both for the unimpaired and impaired quadriceps, NMES makes sense compared with doing no exercises but volitional exercises appear to be more effective in most situations.Based on the available evidence, NMES may only be preferred over volitional training for within-cast muscle training and perhaps in specific situations where volitional training does not receive sufficient patient compliance. Further research should be directed toward identifying the clinical impact at activity and participation levels and the optimal stimulation parameters of this modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15730336     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  47 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation for drop foot, 1772.

Authors:  D Stillings
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1975 Nov-Dec

2.  A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines.

Authors:  R Harbour; J Miller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-11

Review 3.  High frequency electrical stimulation in muscle strengthening. A review and discussion.

Authors:  D M Selkowitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The effect of electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength and thigh circumference in menisectomy patients.

Authors:  R A Williams; M C Morrissey; C E Brewster
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Changes in quadriceps femoris muscle strength using isometric exercise versus electrical stimulation.

Authors:  R J Kubiak; K M Whitman; R M Johnston
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Electrical stimulation as a strength improvement technique: a review.

Authors:  J F Kramer; S W Mendryk
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; A Delitto; S L Bailey; S W Stralka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group.

Authors:  J A Berlin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews.

Authors:  K Dickersin; R Scherer; C Lefebvre
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-12

10.  Improvement in isometric strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle after training with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D M Selkowitz
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1985-02
View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Late neural adaptations to electrostimulation resistance training of the plantar flexor muscles.

Authors:  Marc Jubeau; Raphaël Zory; Julien Gondin; Alain Martin; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Neural and muscular changes to detraining after electrostimulation training.

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Marie Guette; Yves Ballay; Alain Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity over the tibial nerve trunk on triceps surae muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Aude-Clémence M Doix; Boris Matkowski; Alain Martin; Karin Roeleveld; Serge S Colson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effects of electrostimulation and plyometric training program combination on jump height in teenage athletes.

Authors:  Emilio J Martínez-López; Elisa Benito-Martínez; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Amador Lara-Sánchez; Antonio Martínez-Amat
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Comparison between electrically evoked and voluntary isometric contractions for biceps brachii muscle oxidative metabolism using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Makii Muthalib; Marc Jubeau; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Caution is required when comparing the effectiveness of voluntary versus stimulated versus combined strength training modalities.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning.

Authors:  Alberto Botter; Gianmosè Oprandi; Fabio Lanfranco; Stefano Allasia; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Marco Alessandro Minetto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Effects of electromyostimulation on muscle and bone in men with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alfredo Arija-Blázquez; Silvia Ceruelo-Abajo; María S Díaz-Merino; Juan Antonio Godino-Durán; Luís Martínez-Dhier; José L R Martin; José Florensa-Vila
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 10.  Combined application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary muscular contractions.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.