Literature DB >> 19908060

Less indication of muscle damage in the second than initial electrical muscle stimulation bout consisting of isometric contractions of the knee extensors.

Abdulaziz Aldayel1, Marc Jubeau, Michael R McGuigan, Kazunori Nosaka.   

Abstract

This study compared the first and second exercise bouts consisting of electrically evoked isometric contractions for muscle damage profile. Nine healthy men (31 +/- 4 years) had two electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) bouts separated by 2 weeks. The knee extensors of one leg were stimulated by biphasic rectangular pulses (75 Hz, 400 mus, on-off ratio 5-15 s) at the knee joint angle of 100 degrees (0 degrees , full extension) to induce 40 isometric contractions, while the current amplitude was increased to maintain maximal force generation. Maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) torque of the knee extensors at 100 degrees , muscle soreness, pressure pain threshold and plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity were used as indirect markers of muscle damage, and measured before and 1, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after EMS bout, and the changes over time were compared between bouts. The torque produced during exercise was approximately 30% of MVC, and no significant difference between bouts was evident for the changes in peak and average torque over 40 contractions. MVC decreased significantly (P < 0.05) by 26% immediately and 1 h after both bouts, but the recovery was significantly (P < 0.05) faster after the second bout (100% at 96 h) compared with the first bout (81% at 96 h). Development of muscle soreness and tenderness, and increases in plasma CK activity were significantly (P < 0.05) smaller after the second than the first bout. These results show that changes in muscle damage markers were attenuated in the second EMS bout compared with the initial EMS bout.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19908060     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1278-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  36 in total

1.  Effects of electromyostimulation training and volleyball practice on jumping ability.

Authors:  Davide Malatesta; Fabio Cattaneo; Sergio Dugnani; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Functional MRI determination of a dose-response relationship to lower extremity neuromuscular electrical stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Gerald V Smith; Gad Alon; Steven R Roys; Rao P Gullapalli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation to lengthening contraction-induced injury in mouse muscle.

Authors:  Christopher P Ingalls; J C Wenke; Talal Nofal; R B Armstrong
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-04-30

Review 4.  Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Chris M Gregory; C Scott Bickel
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-04

5.  Evidence of skeletal muscle damage following electrically stimulated isometric muscle contractions in humans.

Authors:  Abigail L Mackey; Jens Bojsen-Moller; Klaus Qvortrup; Henning Langberg; Charlotte Suetta; Kari K Kalliokoski; Michael Kjaer; S Peter Magnusson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-09-18

6.  Comparison of isometric muscle training and electrical stimulation supplementing isometric muscle training in the recovery after major knee ligament surgery. A preliminary report.

Authors:  E Eriksson; T Häggmark
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  High voltage electrical stimulation in the augmentation of muscle strength: effects of pulse frequency.

Authors:  J A Balogun; O O Onilari; O A Akeju; D K Marzouk
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Differences in quadriceps femoris muscle torque when using a clinical electrical stimulator versus a portable electrical stimulator.

Authors:  Christian L Lyons; Joel B Robb; James J Irrgang; G Kelley Fitzgerald
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-01

9.  Attenuation of muscle damage by preconditioning with muscle hyperthermia 1-day prior to eccentric exercise.

Authors:  K Nosaka; M Muthalib; A Lavender; P B Laursen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Central contributions to contractions evoked by tetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  David F Collins
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.230

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Kazunori Nosaka; Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Trevor C Chen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Sequenced response of extracellular matrix deadhesion and fibrotic regulators after muscle damage is involved in protection against future injury in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Abigail L Mackey; Simon Brandstetter; Peter Schjerling; Jens Bojsen-Moller; Klaus Qvortrup; Mette M Pedersen; Simon Doessing; Michael Kjaer; S Peter Magnusson; Henning Langberg
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Comparison in muscle damage between maximal voluntary and electrically evoked isometric contractions of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Marc Jubeau; Makii Muthalib; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Alteration of muscle function after electrical stimulation bout of knee extensors and flexors.

Authors:  Marc Vanderthommen; Mylène Triffaux; Christophe Demoulin; Jean-Michel Crielaard; Jean-Louis Croisier
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Effect of tendon vibration during wide-pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the decline and recovery of muscle force.

Authors:  Vanesa Bochkezanian; Robert U Newton; Gabriel S Trajano; Amilton Vieira; Timothy S Pulverenti; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 7.  (Whole-Body) Electromyostimulation, Muscle Damage, and Immune System: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Marc Teschler; Frank C Mooren
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Time course of central and peripheral alterations after isometric neuromuscular electrical stimulation-induced muscle damage.

Authors:  Alexandre Fouré; Kazunori Nosaka; Jennifer Wegrzyk; Guillaume Duhamel; Arnaud Le Troter; Hélène Boudinet; Jean-Pierre Mattei; Christophe Vilmen; Marc Jubeau; David Bendahan; Julien Gondin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening?

Authors:  Neal R Glaviano; Susan Saliba
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Acute metabolic, hormonal, and psychological responses to strength training with superimposed EMS at the beginning and the end of a 6 week training period.

Authors:  N Wirtz; P Wahl; H Kleinöder; K Wechsler; S Achtzehn; J Mester
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.