UNLABELLED: This study was performed to assess the validity of the MyWellness Key (MWK) accelerometer during a treadmill-based protocol. The identification of different exercise intensities is imperative to objectively measure time spent at a specified exercise intensity. Thirty subjects, 15 men and 15 women (age = 24.5 ± 2.6 years; body mass index = 22.5 ± 2.5 kg·m(-1)), participated in a 4-phase treadmill protocol (5 minutes each one) using three different walking velocities (3, 4.5, and 6 km·h(-1)) and run (8 km·h(-1)) while outfitted with a MWK uniaxial accelerometer. Oxygen consumption was measured by indirect calorimetry (ICVO2). RESULTS: The relationship between VO2 predicted from MWK (MWKVO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2 (ICVO2)), yielded a high and significant correlation (r = 0. 944; p < 0.001) with standard error of estimate (SEE) = 2.42 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1). The average differences between the two methods (MWKVO2 - ICVO2) were -0.79 (-8. 8% at 3 km·h(-1)), -0.02 (-0.2% at 4.5 km·h(-1)), 0.51 (3.3% at 6 km·h(-1)) and -0.74 (-2.7% at 8 km·h(-1)) ml·kg(-1)·min(-1). Only the 3 km·h(-1) speed showed a difference when compared to the criterion measure (p < 0.001). Bland and Altman analysis revealed less than a 1 MET difference in the mean at each point estimate and relatively tight distribution with the standard errors, especially with the 2 moderate walking speeds. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high correlation between oxygen utilization and the MWK with low standard errors estimates. This indicates that this accelerometer can be used to identify exercise intensities that are related to walking and running. Key pointsFirst laboratory validation of a new uniaxial accelerometer, the MyWellness Key.Results indicate a good exercise intensity prediction during walking at moderate to high speeds.Comparing with other laboratory validations, MyWellness Key exercise intensity detection is aligned with other accelerometers.MyWellness Key can be used to give valid measurements for a range of ambulatory activity in addition to the capabilities to give real-time feedback to the participant in health promotion studies.
UNLABELLED: This study was performed to assess the validity of the MyWellness Key (MWK) accelerometer during a treadmill-based protocol. The identification of different exercise intensities is imperative to objectively measure time spent at a specified exercise intensity. Thirty subjects, 15 men and 15 women (age = 24.5 ± 2.6 years; body mass index = 22.5 ± 2.5 kg·m(-1)), participated in a 4-phase treadmill protocol (5 minutes each one) using three different walking velocities (3, 4.5, and 6 km·h(-1)) and run (8 km·h(-1)) while outfitted with a MWK uniaxial accelerometer. Oxygen consumption was measured by indirect calorimetry (ICVO2). RESULTS: The relationship between VO2 predicted from MWK (MWKVO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2 (ICVO2)), yielded a high and significant correlation (r = 0. 944; p < 0.001) with standard error of estimate (SEE) = 2.42 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1). The average differences between the two methods (MWKVO2 - ICVO2) were -0.79 (-8. 8% at 3 km·h(-1)), -0.02 (-0.2% at 4.5 km·h(-1)), 0.51 (3.3% at 6 km·h(-1)) and -0.74 (-2.7% at 8 km·h(-1)) ml·kg(-1)·min(-1). Only the 3 km·h(-1) speed showed a difference when compared to the criterion measure (p < 0.001). Bland and Altman analysis revealed less than a 1 MET difference in the mean at each point estimate and relatively tight distribution with the standard errors, especially with the 2 moderate walking speeds. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high correlation between oxygen utilization and the MWK with low standard errors estimates. This indicates that this accelerometer can be used to identify exercise intensities that are related to walking and running. Key pointsFirst laboratory validation of a new uniaxial accelerometer, the MyWellness Key.Results indicate a good exercise intensity prediction during walking at moderate to high speeds.Comparing with other laboratory validations, MyWellness Key exercise intensity detection is aligned with other accelerometers.MyWellness Key can be used to give valid measurements for a range of ambulatory activity in addition to the capabilities to give real-time feedback to the participant in health promotion studies.
Authors: Søren Brage; Niels Wedderkopp; Paul W Franks; Lars Bo Andersen; Karsten Froberg Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Mark G Abel; James C Hannon; Katie Sell; Tia Lillie; Geri Conlin; David Anderson Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Jemma Hawkins; Michelle Edwards; Joanna Charles; Russell Jago; Mark Kelson; Kelly Morgan; Simon Murphy; Emily Oliver; Sharon Simpson; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Graham Moore Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2017-12-12
Authors: John C Sieverdes; Eric E Wickel; Gregory A Hand; Marco Bergamin; Robert R Moran; Steven N Blair Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: James P Sanders; Adam Loveday; Natalie Pearson; Charlotte Edwardson; Thomas Yates; Stuart J H Biddle; Dale W Esliger Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stefano Balducci; Massimo Sacchetti; Jonida Haxhi; Giorgio Orlando; Silvano Zanuso; Patrizia Cardelli; Stefano Cavallo; Valeria D'Errico; Maria Cristina Ribaudo; Nicolina Di Biase; Laura Salvi; Martina Vitale; Lucilla Bollanti; Francesco G Conti; Antonio Nicolucci; Giuseppe Pugliese Journal: Trials Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 2.279