S D Herrmann1, T L Hart, C D Lee, B E Ainsworth. 1. Healthy Lifestyles Research Center, Program in Exercise and Wellness, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 7350 E. Unity Avenue, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA. stephen.herrmann@asu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to examine the concurrent validity of the Technogym MyWellness Key accelerometer against objective and subjective physical activity (PA) measures. DESIGN: randomised, cross-sectional design with two phases. The laboratory phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph GT1M and the Yamax SW200 Digiwalker pedometer during graded treadmill walking, increasing speed each minute. The free-living phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph, Digiwalker, Bouchard Activity cord (BAR) and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for seven continuous days. Data were analysed using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for all comparisons. SETTING: laboratory and free-living phases. PARTICIPANTS: sixteen participants randomly stratified from 41 eligible respondents by sex (n=8 men; n=8 women) and PA levels (n=4 low, n=8 middle and n=4 high active). RESULTS: there was a strong association between the MyWellness Key and the ActiGraph accelerometer during controlled graded treadmill walking (r=0.91, p<0.01) and in free-living settings (r=0.73-0.76 for light to vigorous PA, respectively, p<0.01). No associations were observed between the MyWellness Key and the BAR and GPAQ (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: the MyWellness Key has a high concurrent validity with the ActiGraph accelerometer to detect PA in both controlled laboratory and free-living settings.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: to examine the concurrent validity of the Technogym MyWellness Key accelerometer against objective and subjective physical activity (PA) measures. DESIGN: randomised, cross-sectional design with two phases. The laboratory phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph GT1M and the Yamax SW200 Digiwalker pedometer during graded treadmill walking, increasing speed each minute. The free-living phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph, Digiwalker, Bouchard Activity cord (BAR) and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for seven continuous days. Data were analysed using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for all comparisons. SETTING: laboratory and free-living phases. PARTICIPANTS: sixteen participants randomly stratified from 41 eligible respondents by sex (n=8 men; n=8 women) and PA levels (n=4 low, n=8 middle and n=4 high active). RESULTS: there was a strong association between the MyWellness Key and the ActiGraph accelerometer during controlled graded treadmill walking (r=0.91, p<0.01) and in free-living settings (r=0.73-0.76 for light to vigorous PA, respectively, p<0.01). No associations were observed between the MyWellness Key and the BAR and GPAQ (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: the MyWellness Key has a high concurrent validity with the ActiGraph accelerometer to detect PA in both controlled laboratory and free-living settings.
Authors: Anne Z Hoch; Paula Papanek; Aniko Szabo; Michael E Widlansky; Jane E Schimke; David D Gutterman Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Marco Bergamin; Andrea Ermolao; John C Sieverdes; Marco Zaccaria; Silvano Zanuso Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Jemma Hawkins; Michelle Edwards; Joanna Charles; Russell Jago; Mark Kelson; Kelly Morgan; Simon Murphy; Emily Oliver; Sharon Simpson; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Graham Moore Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2017-12-12
Authors: Krista L Best; François Routhier; Shane N Sweet; Kelly P Arbour-Nicitopoulos; Jaimie F Borisoff; Luc Noreau; Kathleen A Martin Ginis Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-04-26
Authors: John C Sieverdes; Eric E Wickel; Gregory A Hand; Marco Bergamin; Robert R Moran; Steven N Blair Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: James P Sanders; Adam Loveday; Natalie Pearson; Charlotte Edwardson; Thomas Yates; Stuart J H Biddle; Dale W Esliger Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stefano Balducci; Massimo Sacchetti; Jonida Haxhi; Giorgio Orlando; Silvano Zanuso; Patrizia Cardelli; Stefano Cavallo; Valeria D'Errico; Maria Cristina Ribaudo; Nicolina Di Biase; Laura Salvi; Martina Vitale; Lucilla Bollanti; Francesco G Conti; Antonio Nicolucci; Giuseppe Pugliese Journal: Trials Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 2.279