| Literature DB >> 24146857 |
Christoph Hammerstingl1, Robert Schueler, Martin Wiesen, Diana Momcilovic, Stefan Pabst, Georg Nickenig, Dirk Skowasch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has deteriorating effect on LV function, whereas its impact on RV function is controversial. We aimed to determine the effect of OSA and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on left and right ventricular (LV, RV) function using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 2 dimensional speckle tracking (2D ST) analysis of RV deformation capability. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24146857 PMCID: PMC3795765 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and echocardiographic characteristics of the study group.
| All patients atbaseline (mean ±SD) (n = 82) | All patients at 6months FU (mean ±SD) (n = 82) | Group 1 AHI5–14 (n = 29) | Group 2 AHI15–30 (n = 24) | Group 3 AHI>30(n = 29) |
| |
| Age [years] | 63.3±11.5 | 61.8±13.0 | 66.3±10.5 | 62.5±10.7 | ns | |
| Male gender | 52 (63.4%) | 52 (63.4%) | 21 (72.4%) | 13 (54.1%) | 17 (58.6%) | ns |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 30.7±5.5 | 30.7±6.4 | 28.9±4.9 | 30.4±4.5 | 32.9±6.3 | 0.02 |
| AHI [n/h] | 31.4±26.8 | 5.6±7.1 | 9.0±2.8 | 22.0±4.4 | 61.7±22.7 | <0.0001 |
| ODI | 22.7±23.0 | 7.3±10.1 | 8.4±8.7 | 19.2±10.2 | 40.5±28.7 | <0.0001 |
| ESS | 10.0±5.4 | 7.5±4.5 | 8.5±4.1 | 9.4±4.9 | 13.6±4.9 | 0.03 |
| Hypertension | 44 (53.6%) | 44 (53.6%) | 13 (44.8%) | 15 (62.5%) | 16 (55.1%) | ns |
| CHF | 16 (19.5%) | 16 (19.5%) | 4 (13.8%) | 4 (16.6%) | 7 (24.1%) | ns |
| Diabetes mellitus | 10 (12.2%) | 10 (12.2%) | 1 (3.4%) | 4 (16.6%) | 5 (17.2%) | ns |
| History of stroke | 4 (4.9%) | 4 (4.9%) | 2 (6.8%) | 2 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | ns |
| CAD | 11 (13.4%) | 11 (13.4%) | 3 (10.0%) | 5 (20.8%) | 3 (10.3%) | ns |
| Smoking | 30 (36.6%) | 30 (36.6%) | 10 (34.5%) | 7 (29.1%) | 12 (41.3%) | ns |
| HLP | 30 (36.6%) | 30 (36.6%) | 9 (31.0%) | 12 (50%) | 9 (31%) | ns |
|
| ||||||
| Aspirin | 25 (30.5%) | 25 (30.5%) | 7 (24.1%) | 9 (37.5%) | 9 (31%) | ns |
| Beta blocker | 25 (30.5%) | 25 (30.5%) | 8 (27.6%) | 7 (29.2%) | 10 (34.5%) | ns |
| ACEI/ARB | 25 (30.5%) | 25 (30.5%) | 6 (20.7%) | 9 (37.5%) | 10 (34.5%) | ns |
| Diuretics | 26 (31.7%) | 26 (31.7%) | 8 (27.6%) | 10 (41.7%) | 8 (27.6%) | ns |
| Statin | 18 (22%) | 18 (22%) | 6 (20.7%) | 7 (29.2%) | 5 (17.2%) | ns |
| Oral anticoagulant | 5 (6.1%) | 5 (6.1%) | 1 (3.4%) | 3 (12.5%) | 1 (3.4%) | ns |
|
| ||||||
| LVEF [%] | 60.7±8.4 | 63.2±7.2 | 65.0±6.9 | 59.5±6.9 | 57.5±5.6 | <0.0001 |
| sPAP [mmHg] | 16.9±11.2 | 16.7±11.6 | 18.6±12.3 | 15.7±10.1 | 16.4±11.0 | ns |
| IVSd [cm] | 1.3±0.2 | 1.3±0.4 | 1.3±0.3 | 1.3±0.2 | 1.3±0.3 | ns |
| SV [ml] | 66.0±23.9 | 67.7±21.9 | 66.0±23.9 | 68.7±23.7 | 62.6±21.5 | ns |
| MV e′/a′ | 0.8±0.9 | 0.8±0.4 | 0.8±0.9 | 0.9±0.3 | 0.9±0.4 | ns |
| LV MPI | 0.4±0.2 | 0.4±0.2 | 0.4±0.2 | 0.4±0.2 | 0.5±0.1 | ns |
| e/e′ | 11.0±6.2 | 10.1±3.6 | 9.9±2.7 | 10.3±3.2 | 12.7±9.5 | ns |
| RV MPI | 0.4±0.3 | 0.4±0.2 | 0.3±0.2 | 0.4±0.4 | 0.3±0.3 | ns |
| TDI TKS [m/s] | 0.1±0.02 | 0.4±1.9 | 0.1±0.02 | 0.1±0.02 | 0.1±0.03 | ns |
| TAPSE [mm] | 24.8±5.9 | 24.3±5.9 | 24.2±6.5 | 24.9±6.0 | 25.1±6.4 | ns |
| 2D global RV-Sl [%] | −16.9±7.5 | −17.6±8.6 | −21.5±6.3 | −14.3±5.3 | −14.5±8.2 | <0.0001 |
| 2D apical RV-Sl [%] | −11.3±8.4 | −15.0±6.8 | −17.3±8.7 | −9.8±6.0 | −6.3±5.7 | <0.0001 |
| 2D medial RV-Sl [%] | −16.9±8.2 | −15.6±8.0 | −19.8±5.6 | −14.9±6.8 | −15.7±10.7 | ns |
| 2D basal RV-Sl [%] | −22.7±13.3 | −21.5±12.8 | −27.4±13.6 | −18.2±8.7 | −21.6±14.9 | 0.03 |
significance of changes when comparing baseline and follow up measurements <0.05; 2D RV-Sl, two dimensional right ventricular longitudinal strain; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; AHI, apnea hypopnea index; ARBI, angiotensin receptor blocker; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHF, chronic heart failure; BMI, body mass index; e/e′, early/early′; ESS, Epworth sleepiness scale; HLP, hyperlipoproteinemia; IVSd, diastolic interventricular septum thickness; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LV/RV MPI, left ventricular/right ventricular myocardial performance index; MV e′/a, mitral velocity early′/atrial; ns, not statistically significant; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; SD, standard deviation; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; SV, stroke volume; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TDI TKS, tricuspid annular systolic tissue Doppler velocity.
Figure 1Scatter plot - Correlation of AHI to baseline data.
(A) Correlation of AHI to BMI, (B) Correlation of AHI to LVEF, (C) Correlation of AHI global RV-Sl, (D) Correlation of AHI to apical RV-Sl. 2D RV-Sl, two dimensional right ventricular longitudinal strain; AHI, apnea hypopnea index; BMI, body mass index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Figure 2Comparative receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis of BMI and apical 2D RV-Sl for the identification of patients with an AHI>30.
2D RV-Sl, two dimensional right ventricular strain; AHI, apnea hypopnea index; P, significance of difference between the two curves.
Figure 3Boxplot - Development of left ventricular ejection fraction after CPAP according to AHI groups.
AHI, apnea hypopnea index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; ns, not significant.
Figure 4Boxplot - Development of apical RV-Sl after CPAP according to AHI groups.
2D RV-Sl, two dimensional right ventricular strain; AHI, apnea hypopnea index; ns, not significant.
Echocardiographic and clinical parameters before and after 6 months of CPAP treatment.
| Baseline(n = 82) | After CPAP (n = 82) |
| |
| AHI [n/h] | 31.4±26.8 | 5.6±7.1 | <0.0001 |
| ESS | 10.0±5.4 | 7.5±4.5 | <0.0001 |
| LVEF [%] | 60.7±8.4 | 63.2±7.2 | 0.001 |
| sPAP [mmHg] | 16.9±11.2 | 16.7±11.6 | ns |
| IVSd [cm] | 1.3±0.2 | 1.3±0.4 | ns |
| SV [ml] | 66.0±23.9 | 67.7±21.9 | ns |
| MV e′/a′ | 0.8±0.9 | 0.8±0.4 | ns |
| LV MPI | 0.4±0.2 | 0.4±0.2 | ns |
| e/e′ | 11.0±6.2 | 10.1±3.6 | ns |
| RV MPI | 0.4±0.3 | 0.4±0.2 | ns |
| TAPSE | 24.8±5.9 | 24.3±5.9 | ns |
| 2D global RV-Sl [%] | −16.9±7.5 | −17.6±8.5 | ns |
| 2D apical RV-Sl [%] | −11.3±8.4 | −15.0±6.8 | 0.001 |
| 2D medial RV-Sl [%] | −16.9±8.2 | −15.6±8.0 | ns |
| 2D basal RV-Sl [%] | −22.7±13.3 | −21.5±12.8 | ns |
2D RV-Sl, two dimensional right ventricular longitudinal strain; AHI, apnea hypopnea index; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; e/e′, early/early′; ESS, Epworth sleepiness scale; IVSd, diastolic interventricular septum thickness; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LV/RV MPI, left ventricular/right ventricular myocardial performance index; MV e′/a, mitral velocity early′/atrial; ns, not statistically significant; SD, standard deviation; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; SV, stroke volume; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TDI TKS, tricuspid annular systolic tissue Doppler velocity.
Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of apical and global 2D RV-Sl assed by 2 dimensional speckle tracking imaging.
| Intraobserver | Interobserver | |||||
| Mean difference ± SD | ICC | p-value | Mean difference ± SD | ICC |
| |
| 2D global RV-Sl | 1.8±7.5 | 0.88 | 0.007 | 2.0±8.9 | 0.82 | 0.02 |
| 2D apical RV-Sl | 1.5±1.1 | 0.96 | 0.001 | 2.8±3.1 | 0.92 | 0.01 |
| 2D mid RV-Sl | 2.0±1.2 | 0.85 | 0.01 | 3.0±2.1 | 0.79 | 0.03 |
| 2D basal RV-Sl | 1.9±1.5 | 0.87 | 0.009 | 2.5±1.2 | 0.80 | 0.03 |
2D RV-Sl, two dimensional right ventricular longitudinal strain; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; SD, standard deviation.