BACKGROUND: In contrast to the homogeneously distributed deformation properties within the left ventricle, the right ventricular (RV) free wall (RVFW) shows a more inhomogeneous distribution. It has been demonstrated that pulmonary hypertension (PH) results in significant RVFW mechanical delay. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the degree of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure on the RVFW strain gradient and on myocardial velocity generation. METHODS: Peak longitudinal strain and velocity data were collected from three different segments (basal, mid- and apical) of the RVFW in 17 normal individuals and 31 PH patients. RESULTS: A total of 144 RV wall segments were analyzed. RVFW strain values in individuals without PH were higher in the mid and apical segments than in the basal segment. In contrast, RVFW strain in PH patients was higher in basal segments and diminished toward the apex. In terms of RVFW velocities, both groups showed decremental values from basal to apical segments. Basal and mid-RVFW velocities were significantly lower in PH patients than in individuals without PH. CONCLUSIONS: PH results in significant alterations of strain and velocity generation that occurs along the RVFW. Of these abnormalities, the reduction in strain from the mid and apical RVFW segments was most predictive of PH. It is important to be aware of these differences in strain generation when studying the effect of PH on the right ventricle. Additional studies are required to determine whether these differences are due to RV remodelling.
BACKGROUND: In contrast to the homogeneously distributed deformation properties within the left ventricle, the right ventricular (RV) free wall (RVFW) shows a more inhomogeneous distribution. It has been demonstrated that pulmonary hypertension (PH) results in significant RVFW mechanical delay. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the degree of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure on the RVFW strain gradient and on myocardial velocity generation. METHODS: Peak longitudinal strain and velocity data were collected from three different segments (basal, mid- and apical) of the RVFW in 17 normal individuals and 31 PH patients. RESULTS: A total of 144 RV wall segments were analyzed. RVFW strain values in individuals without PH were higher in the mid and apical segments than in the basal segment. In contrast, RVFW strain in PH patients was higher in basal segments and diminished toward the apex. In terms of RVFW velocities, both groups showed decremental values from basal to apical segments. Basal and mid-RVFW velocities were significantly lower in PH patients than in individuals without PH. CONCLUSIONS: PH results in significant alterations of strain and velocity generation that occurs along the RVFW. Of these abnormalities, the reduction in strain from the mid and apical RVFW segments was most predictive of PH. It is important to be aware of these differences in strain generation when studying the effect of PH on the right ventricle. Additional studies are required to determine whether these differences are due to RV remodelling.
Authors: Neil L Greenberg; Michael S Firstenberg; Peter L Castro; Michael Main; Agnese Travaglini; Jill A Odabashian; Jeanne K Drinko; L Leonardo Rodriguez; James D Thomas; Mario J Garcia Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cheuk-Man Yu; Elaine Chau; John E Sanderson; Katherine Fan; Man-Oi Tang; Wing-Hong Fung; Hong Lin; Shun-Ling Kong; Yui-Ming Lam; Michael R S Hill; Chu-Pak Lau Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Cazeau; C Leclercq; T Lavergne; S Walker; C Varma; C Linde; S Garrigue; L Kappenberger; G A Haywood; M Santini; C Bailleul; J C Daubert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-03-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Kowalski; T Kukulski; F Jamal; J D'hooge; F Weidemann; F Rademakers; B Bijnens; L Hatle; G R Sutherland Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Xander A A M Verbeek; Kevin Vernooy; Maaike Peschar; Theo Van Der Nagel; Arne Van Hunnik; Frits W Prinzen Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Thor Edvardsen; Bernhard L Gerber; Jérôme Garot; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima; Otto A Smiseth Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rochus K Voeller; Abdulhameed Aziz; Hersh S Maniar; Nneka N Ufere; Ajay K Taggar; Noel J Bernabe; Brian P Cupps; Marc R Moon Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Yossra Mahran; Robert Schueler; Marcel Weber; Carmen Pizarro; Georg Nickenig; Dirk Skowasch; Christoph Hammerstingl Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2016-08-26
Authors: Christoph Hammerstingl; Robert Schueler; Lisa Bors; Diana Momcilovic; Stefan Pabst; Georg Nickenig; Dirk Skowasch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christoph Hammerstingl; Robert Schueler; Martin Wiesen; Diana Momcilovic; Stefan Pabst; Georg Nickenig; Dirk Skowasch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 3.240