Literature DB >> 24145186

Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates.

Eric J Forman1, Kathleen H Hong2, Jason M Franasiak2, Richard T Scott2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether performing elective single embryo transfer (eSET) after trophectoderm biopsy and rapid aneuploidy screening results in improved obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with transferring 2 untested embryos. STUDY
DESIGN: The Blastocyst Euploid Selective Transfer (BEST) Trial enrolled infertile couples with a female partner up to age 42 years who were undergoing in vitro fertilization. They were randomized to receive transfer of a single euploid embryo (eSET) or to the standard of care with transfer of 2 embryos that were not biopsied for aneuploidy screening (untested 2-embryo transfer). Gestational age at delivery, birthweight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) lengths of stay were compared with Mann-Whitney U. The risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight, and NICU admission were compared with χ(2).
RESULTS: Among the 175 randomized patients, the delivery rates were similar (69% after euploid eSET vs 72% after untested 2-embryo transfer; P = .6) through the fresh cycle and up to 1 frozen transfer, with a dramatic difference in multiple births (1.6% vs 47%; P < .0001). The risk of preterm delivery (P = .03), low birthweight (P = .002), and NICU admission (P = .04) were significantly higher after untested 2-embryo transfer. Babies born after untested 2-embryo transfer spent >5 times as many days in the NICU (479 vs 93 days; P = .03).
CONCLUSION: By enhancing embryo selection with a validated method of aneuploidy screening, a single euploid embryo with high reproductive potential can be selected for transfer. Using this approach, eSET can be performed without compromising delivery rates and improving the chance of having a healthy, term singleton delivery after in vitro fertilization.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneuploidy screening; in vitro fertilization; preimplantation genetic screening; single embryo transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24145186     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  37 in total

1.  Vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis/preimplantation genetic screening cycles.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Rong Li; Ying Lian; Lixue Chen; Xiaodan Shi; Jie Qiao; Ping Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

2.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Wendy Y Zhang; Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Kristopher I Kapphahn; Raquel R Fleischmann; Qianying Zhao; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Monogenic Disorders: the Value of Concurrent Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Taraneh Nazem; Alan Berkeley; Steven Palter; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a counseling tool.

Authors:  Randi H Goldman; Catherine Racowsky; Leslie V Farland; Janis H Fox; Santiago Munné; Lia Ribustello; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Comparison of perinatal outcomes between spontaneous vs. commissioned cycles in gestational carriers for single and same-sex male intended parents.

Authors:  Z Pavlovic; K C Hammer; M Raff; P Patel; K N Kunze; B Kaplan; C Coughlin; J Hirshfeld-Cytron
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The impact of patient preselection on reported IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic screening for women older than 37 undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Stephen C Collins; Xiao Xu; Winifred Mak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Embryo wastage rates remain high in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a look at the trends from 2004-2013 in the USA.

Authors:  Sanaz Ghazal; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The impact of age beyond ploidy: outcome data from 8175 euploid single embryo transfers.

Authors:  Andres Reig; Jason Franasiak; Richard T Scott; Emre Seli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Aneuploidy across individual chromosomes at the embryonic level in trophectoderm biopsies: changes with patient age and chromosome structure.

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Kathleen M Upham; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.