Literature DB >> 32173784

The impact of age beyond ploidy: outcome data from 8175 euploid single embryo transfers.

Andres Reig1, Jason Franasiak2,3, Richard T Scott2,3, Emre Seli4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The rate of embryonic aneuploidy increases with increasing female age and is the primary cause of lower pregnancy and live birth rates (LBR) in older reproductive age women. This retrospective cohort study evaluates single euploid embryo transfers to determine whether an age-related decline in reproductive efficiency persists.
METHODS: A total of 8175 non-donor single embryo transfers (SET) after pre-implantation testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and cryopreservation were included. These were divided into five groups by patient age: < 35 years old (n = 3789 embryos transferred), 35-37 (n = 2200), 38-40 (n = 1624), 41-42 (n = 319), and > 42 (n = 243). Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and LBR were calculated for each group as a percentage of embryos transferred and compared. CPR was also analyzed as a percentage of implanted pregnancies, and LBR as a percentage of clinical pregnancies, to determine when age has the greatest impact. These results were then adjusted for confounding variables via a multivariate logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Implantation rates negatively correlated with age. After adjusting for confounders, women 38 years or older had a significantly lower IR than those under 35 (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.73-0.99 for 38-40 years old; 0.69, 0.53-0.91 for 41-42, and 0.69, 0.51-0.94 for > 42). These differences are also apparent in CPR and LBR. The rates of progression to clinical pregnancy and live birth did not differ significantly by age group. Other factors observed to affect IR independently were anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), day of embryo transfer, and embryo morphology.
CONCLUSION: While selection of euploid embryos may be effective in overcoming a significant proportion of the age-related decline in reproductive efficiency, a decrease in IR, CPR, and LBR persists even when analyzing only euploid embryo transfers. The observed impact of aging is, therefore, independent of ploidy, as well as of other variables that affect reproductive efficiency. These results indicate that factors other than aneuploidy contribute to reproductive senescence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Pregestational genetic testing; Reproductive aging; Single embryo transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32173784      PMCID: PMC7125286          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01739-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

1.  Mean age of mother, 1970-2000.

Authors:  T J Mathews; Brady E Hamilton
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2002-12-11

2.  Ovarian Aging.

Authors:  Emre Seli
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.303

3.  Mean Age of Mothers is on the Rise: United States, 2000-2014.

Authors:  T J Mathews; Brady E Hamilton
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2016-01

4.  United States Life Tables, 2016.

Authors:  Elizabeth Arias; Jiaquan Xu; Kenneth D Kochanek
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2019-05

5.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage.

Authors:  Shelby A Neal; Scott J Morin; Jason M Franasiak; Linnea R Goodman; Caroline R Juneau; Eric J Forman; Marie D Werner; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Culture and transfer of human blastocysts.

Authors:  D K Gardner; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.927

7.  Does maternal age at retrieval influence the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts?

Authors:  Mohamad Irani; Nikica Zaninovic; Zev Rosenwaks; Kangpu Xu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Female age-related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Jennifer F Kawwass; Michael Monsour; Sara Crawford; Dmitry M Kissin; Donna R Session; Aniket D Kulkarni; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

Authors:  Sarah F Lensen; Jack Wilkinson; Jori A Leijdekkers; Antonio La Marca; Ben Willem J Mol; Jane Marjoribanks; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  The impact of euploid blastocyst morphology and maternal age on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in natural cycle frozen embryo transfers.

Authors:  Wendy Y Zhang; Jasmyn K Johal; Rebecca M Gardner; Brindha Bavan; Amin A Milki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Efstathios Theodorou; Benjamin P Jones; Daniella F Cardenas Armas; Carleen Heath; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben-Nagi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 3.  Defining recurrent implantation failure: a profusion of confusion or simply an illusion?

Authors:  Audrey S Garneau; Steven L Young
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 7.490

4.  Transfer the best and biopsy the rest? Blastocyst euploidy rates differ by morphology and day of biopsy.

Authors:  Katherine E McDaniel; Michael S Awadalla; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Maria Giulia Minasi; Elisabetta Cursio; Pier Francesco Greco; Paolo Barillari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Combined Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Consequences for Embryos Available for Transfer.

Authors:  Pere Mir Pardo; José Antonio Martínez-Conejero; Julio Martín; Carlos Simón; Ana Cervero
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Effect of Blastocyst Morphology and Developmental Rate on Euploidy and Live Birth Rates in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Cycles With Single-Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Na Li; Yichun Guan; Bingnan Ren; Yuchao Zhang; Yulin Du; Hongjiao Kong; Yongjie Zhang; Hua Lou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.055

8.  Live birth rate from euploid blastocysts is not associated with infertility etiology or oocyte source following frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET): analysis of 4148 cycles reported to SART CORS.

Authors:  F Meng; M Goldsammler; E Wantman; E Buyuk; S K Jindal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.