Literature DB >> 24144847

Uncontrolled confounding in studies of screening effectiveness: an example of colonoscopy.

Ronald C Eldridge1, Chyke A Doubeni, Robert H Fletcher, Ann G Zauber, Douglas A Corley, V Paul Doria-Rose, Michael Goodman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the expected magnitude of error produced by uncontrolled confounding from health behaviours in observational medical record-based studies evaluating effectiveness of screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: We used data from the prospective National Institutes of Health American Association of Retired Persons (NIH-AARP) Diet and Health Study to assess the impact of health behaviour related factors (lifestyle, education, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID]) on the association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. We first examined the difference between adjusted and unadjusted results within the cohort data, and then estimated a broader range of likely confounding errors based on the Breslow-Day approach that uses prevalence of confounders among persons with and without exposure, and the rate ratio reflecting the association between these confounders and the outcome of interest. As dietary factors and habits are often inter-correlated, we combined these variables (physical activity, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, alcohol consumption, and intakes of red meat, processed meat, fibre, milk, and calcium) into a "healthy lifestyle score" (HLS).
RESULTS: The estimated error (a ratio of biased-to-true result) attributable to confounding by HLS was 0.959-0.997, indicating less than 5% departure from the true effect of colonoscopy on CRC mortality. The corresponding errors ranged from 0.970 to 0.996 for NSAID, and from 0.974 to 1.006 for education (all ≤3% difference). The results for other CRC screening tests were similar.
CONCLUSION: Health behaviour-related confounders, either alone or in combination, seem unlikely to strongly affect the association between colonoscopy and CRC mortality in observational studies of CRC screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24144847      PMCID: PMC3923570          DOI: 10.1177/0969141313508282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  33 in total

1.  Aspirin use and reduced risk of fatal colon cancer.

Authors:  M J Thun; M M Namboodiri; C W Heath
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1980

3.  Colon cancer screening, lifestyle, and risk of colon cancer.

Authors:  M L Slattery; S L Edwards; K N Ma; G D Friedman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor Thompson; Jean A Shapiro; Sally W Vernon; Ralph J Coates
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality.

Authors:  P A Newcomb; R G Norfleet; B E Storer; T S Surawicz; P M Marcus
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-10-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Risk factors for fatal colon cancer in a large prospective study.

Authors:  M J Thun; E E Calle; M M Namboodiri; W D Flanders; R J Coates; T Byers; P Boffetta; L Garfinkel; C W Heath
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Sheila Weinmann; Kenneth Adams; Aruna Kamineni; Diana S M Buist; Arlene S Ash; Carolyn M Rutter; V Paul Doria-Rose; Douglas A Corley; Robert T Greenlee; Jessica Chubak; Andrew Williams; Aimee R Kroll-Desrosiers; Eric Johnson; Joseph Webster; Kathryn Richert-Boe; Theodore R Levin; Robert H Fletcher; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

1.  Observational methods to assess the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing right colon cancer mortality risk: SCOLAR.

Authors:  Michael Goodman; Robert H Fletcher; V Paul Doria-Rose; Christopher D Jensen; Alexis M Zebrowski; Tracy A Becerra; Virginia P Quinn; Ann G Zauber; Douglas A Corley; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 2.  Colonoscopy Reduces Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Patients With Non-Malignant Findings: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun Pan; Lei Xin; Yi-Fei Ma; Liang-Hao Hu; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Douglas A Corley; Virginia P Quinn; Christopher D Jensen; Ann G Zauber; Michael Goodman; Jill R Johnson; Shivan J Mehta; Tracy A Becerra; Wei K Zhao; Joanne Schottinger; V Paul Doria-Rose; Theodore R Levin; Noel S Weiss; Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The IARC Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Béatrice Lauby-Secretan; Nadia Vilahur; Franca Bianchini; Neela Guha; Kurt Straif
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 176.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.