Literature DB >> 24144073

Predictors of sustained reduction in energy and fat intake in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study intensive lifestyle intervention.

Nichola J Davis, Yong Ma, Linda M Delahanty, Heather J Hoffman, Elizabeth Mayer-Davis, Paul W Franks, Janet Brown-Friday, Mae Isonaga, Andrea M Kriska, Elizabeth M Venditti, Judith Wylie-Rosett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few lifestyle intervention studies examine long-term sustainability of dietary changes.
OBJECTIVE: To describe sustainability of dietary changes over 9 years in the Diabetes Prevention Program and its outcomes study, the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study, among participants receiving the intensive lifestyle intervention.
DESIGN: One thousand seventy-nine participants were enrolled in the intensive lifestyle intervention arm of the Diabetes Prevention Program; 910 continued participation in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Fat and energy intake derived from food frequency questionnaires at baseline and post-randomization Years 1 and 9 were examined. Parsimonious models determined whether baseline characteristics and intensive lifestyle intervention session participation predicted sustainability.
RESULTS: Self-reported energy intake was reduced from a median of 1,876 kcal/day (interquartile range [IQR]=1,452 to 2,549 kcal/day) at baseline to 1,520 kcal/day (IQR=1,192 to 1,986 kcal/day) at Year 1, and 1,560 kcal/day (IQR=1,223 to 2,026 kcal/day) at Year 9. Dietary fat was reduced from a median of 70.4 g (IQR=49.3 to 102.5 g) to 45 g (IQR=32.2 to 63.8 g) at Year 1 and increased to 61.0 g (IQR=44.6 to 82.7 g) at Year 9. Percent energy from fat was reduced from a median of 34.4% (IQR=29.6% to 38.5%) to 27.1% (IQR=23.1% to 31.5%) at Year 1 but increased to 35.3% (IQR=29.7% to 40.2%) at Year 9. Lower baseline energy intake and Year 1 dietary reduction predicted lower energy and fat gram intake at Year 9. Higher leisure physical activity predicted lower fat gram intake but not energy intake.
CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lifestyle intervention can result in reductions in total energy intake for up to 9 years. Initial success in achieving reductions in fat and energy intake and success in attaining activity goals appear to predict long-term success at maintaining changes.
Copyright © 2013 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes prevention; Diet; Dietary change; Dietary intake; Lifestyle intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24144073      PMCID: PMC3962017          DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  25 in total

1.  The Diabetes Prevention Program: baseline characteristics of the randomized cohort. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1).

Authors:  A Ramachandran; C Snehalatha; S Mary; B Mukesh; A D Bhaskar; V Vijay
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  Long-term weight loss maintenance.

Authors:  Rena R Wing; Suzanne Phelan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties.

Authors:  A T Beck; N Epstein; G Brown; R A Steer
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-12

5.  The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  The Diabetes Prevention Program: recruitment methods and results.

Authors:  Richard R Rubin; Wilfred Y Fujimoto; David G Marrero; Tina Brenneman; Jeanne B Charleston; Sharon L Edelstein; Edwin B Fisher; Ruth Jordan; William C Knowler; Lynne C Lichterman; Melvin Prince; Patricia M Rowe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-04

7.  Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.

Authors:  Jaana Lindström; Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka; Markku Peltonen; Sirkka Aunola; Johan G Eriksson; Katri Hemiö; Helena Hämäläinen; Pirjo Härkönen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Mauri Laakso; Anne Louheranta; Marjo Mannelin; Merja Paturi; Jouko Sundvall; Timo T Valle; Matti Uusitupa; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Dietary intake in the diabetes prevention program cohort: baseline and 1-year post randomization.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Karen C Sparks; Katherine Hirst; Tina Costacou; Jennifer C Lovejoy; Judith G Regensteiner; Mary A Hoskin; Andrea M Kriska; George A Bray
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS): Lifestyle intervention and 3-year results on diet and physical activity.

Authors:  Jaana Lindström; Anne Louheranta; Marjo Mannelin; Merja Rastas; Virpi Salminen; Johan Eriksson; Matti Uusitupa; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  First versus repeat treatment with a lifestyle intervention program: attendance and weight loss outcomes.

Authors:  E M Venditti; G A Bray; M L Carrion-Petersen; L M Delahanty; S L Edelstein; R F Hamman; M A Hoskin; W C Knowler; Y Ma
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Weight loss and physical activity for disease prevention in obese older adults: an important role for lifestyle management.

Authors:  Willy Marcos Valencia; Mark Stoutenberg; Hermes Florez
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Prevention of Diabetes Through the Lifestyle Intervention: Lessons Learned from the Diabetes Prevention Program and Outcomes Study and its Translation to Practice.

Authors:  Mary A Hoskin; George A Bray; Kathy Hattaway; Prajakta A Khare-Ranade; Jeremy Pomeroy; Linda N Semler; Valarie A Weinzierl; Judith Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

3.  Long-term changes in dietary and food intake behaviour in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.

Authors:  L M Jaacks; Y Ma; N Davis; L M Delahanty; E J Mayer-Davis; P W Franks; J Brown-Friday; M Isonaga; A M Kriska; E M Venditti; J Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Association of lifestyle factors and suboptimal health status: a cross-sectional study of Chinese students.

Authors:  Jianlu Bi; Ying Huang; Ya Xiao; Jingru Cheng; Fei Li; Tian Wang; Jieyu Chen; Liuguo Wu; Yanyan Liu; Ren Luo; Xiaoshan Zhao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The cost-effectiveness of diabetes prevention: results from the Diabetes Prevention Program and the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.

Authors:  William H Herman
Journal:  Clin Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2015-09-02

6.  Diet quality, weight loss, and diabetes incidence in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).

Authors:  Benjamin T Allaire; Ashley H Tjaden; Elizabeth M Venditti; John W Apolzan; Dana Dabelea; Linda M Delahanty; Sharon L Edelstein; Mary A Hoskin; Karla A Temple; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Lindsay M Jaacks
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2020-12-15

Review 7.  The use of expensive technologies instead of simple, sound and effective lifestyle interventions: a perpetual delusion.

Authors:  Silvia Carlos; Jokin de Irala; Matt Hanley; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Longitudinal changes in the dietary inflammatory index: an assessment of the inflammatory potential of diet over time in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  F K Tabung; S E Steck; J Zhang; Y Ma; A D Liese; F A Tylavsky; M Z Vitolins; J K Ockene; J R Hebert
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.016

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.