Literature DB >> 11943442

The Diabetes Prevention Program: recruitment methods and results.

Richard R Rubin1, Wilfred Y Fujimoto, David G Marrero, Tina Brenneman, Jeanne B Charleston, Sharon L Edelstein, Edwin B Fisher, Ruth Jordan, William C Knowler, Lynne C Lichterman, Melvin Prince, Patricia M Rowe.   

Abstract

The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is a multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to test whether diet and exercise or medication can prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in persons with impaired glucose tolerance, who are at increased risk of the disease. This paper describes DPP recruitment methods, strategies, performance, and costs. The DPP developed an organizational structure for comprehensive management and continuous monitoring of recruitment efforts. The DPP utilized a variety of recruitment strategies, alone or in combination, and a stepped informed consent procedure leading to randomization. Studywide and clinic-specific recruitment data were monitored, analyzed, and used to modify recruitment approaches. DPP recruitment was completed slightly ahead of schedule, meeting goals for the proportion of women enrolled and nearly meeting goals for the proportion of racial/ethnic minorities. Clinics varied widely in the recruitment strategies they used, and these strategies also varied by participant age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Staff time devoted to recruitment averaged 86.8 hours per week per clinic, with the majority of effort by staff specifically assigned to recruitment. The number of staff hours required to recruit a participant varied by recruitment strategy. Recruitment cost (excluding staff cost) was about 1075 US dollars per randomized participant. The DPP experience offers lessons for those planning similar efforts: (1) a method for ongoing assessment and revision of recruitment strategies is valuable; (2) a range of recruitment strategies may be useful; (3) the most effective methods for recruiting potential subjects may vary according to the gender, age, and race/ethnicity of those individuals; (4) recruitment strategies vary in the amount of staff time required to randomize a participant; and (5) a stepped screening may make it easier to identify and recruit volunteers who understand the requirements of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11943442     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00184-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  81 in total

Review 1.  Cultural adaptations of behavioral health interventions: a progress report.

Authors:  Felipe G Castro; Lisa A Strycker; Deborah J Toobert; Manuel Barrera
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-01-30

2.  Strategies to identify adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Healthy Living Partnerships to Prevent Diabetes: recruitment and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Caroline S Blackwell; Kara A Foster; Scott Isom; Jeffrey A Katula; Mara Z Vitolins; Erica L Rosenberger; David C Goff
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Physical activity, weight control, and breast cancer risk and survival: clinical trial rationale and design considerations.

Authors:  Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Sally Hunsberger; Marianne H Alciati; Steven N Blair; Pamela J Goodwin; Anne McTiernan; Rena Wing; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP): History, Evaluation, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Darren Morton; Paul Rankin; Lillian Kent; Wayne Dysinger
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2014-04-22

6.  Randomized Face-to-Face vs. Home Exercise Interventions in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Danielle Symons Downs; Jennifer M Dinallo; Leann L Birch; Ian M Paul; Jan S Ulbrecht
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2017-02-20

7.  Cost effectiveness of recruitment methods in an obesity prevention trial for young children.

Authors:  Jodie L Robinson; Janene H Fuerch; Dana D Winiewicz; Sarah J Salvy; James N Roemmich; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Desiderata for Major Eligibility Criteria in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Matthew L Paulson; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

9.  The challenge of multisite epidemiologic studies in diverse populations: design and implementation of a 22-site study of tuberculosis in foreign-born people.

Authors:  Amy L Davidow; Dolly Katz; Randall Reves; James Bethel; Lolem Ngong
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Energy density and weight change in a long-term weight-loss trial.

Authors:  Andrew Flood; Nathan Mitchell; Melanie Jaeb; Emily A Finch; Patricia S Laqua; Ericka M Welsh; Annie Hotop; Shelby L Langer; Rona L Levy; Robert W Jeffery
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.