A Ramachandran1, C Snehalatha, S Mary, B Mukesh, A D Bhaskar, V Vijay. 1. Diabetes Research Centre, M.V. Hospital for Diabetes, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research, Education and Training in Diabetes, Royapuram, Chennai, India. ramachandran@vsnl.com
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Lifestyle modification helps in the primary prevention of diabetes in multiethnic American, Finnish and Chinese populations. In a prospective community-based study, we tested whether the progression to diabetes could be influenced by interventions in native Asian Indians with IGT who were younger, leaner and more insulin resistant than the above populations. METHODS: We randomised 531 (421 men 110 women) subjects with IGT (mean age 45.9+/-5.7 years, BMI 25.8+/-3.5 kg/m(2)) into four groups. Group 1 was the control, Group 2 was given advice on lifestyle modification (LSM), Group 3 was treated with metformin (MET) and Group 4 was given LSM plus MET. The primary outcome measure was type 2 diabetes as diagnosed using World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 30 months, and the 3-year cumulative incidences of diabetes were 55.0%, 39.3%, 40.5% and 39.5% in Groups 1-4, respectively. The relative risk reduction was 28.5% with LSM (95% CI 20.5-37.3, p=0.018), 26.4% with MET (95% CI 19.1-35.1, p=0.029) and 28.2% with LSM + MET (95% CI 20.3-37.0, p=0.022), as compared with the control group. The number needed to treat to prevent one incident case of diabetes was 6.4 for LSM, 6.9 for MET and 6.5 for LSM + MET. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Progression of IGT to diabetes is high in native Asian Indians. Both LSM and MET significantly reduced the incidence of diabetes in Asian Indians with IGT; there was no added benefit from combining them.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Lifestyle modification helps in the primary prevention of diabetes in multiethnic American, Finnish and Chinese populations. In a prospective community-based study, we tested whether the progression to diabetes could be influenced by interventions in native Asian Indians with IGT who were younger, leaner and more insulin resistant than the above populations. METHODS: We randomised 531 (421 men 110 women) subjects with IGT (mean age 45.9+/-5.7 years, BMI 25.8+/-3.5 kg/m(2)) into four groups. Group 1 was the control, Group 2 was given advice on lifestyle modification (LSM), Group 3 was treated with metformin (MET) and Group 4 was given LSM plus MET. The primary outcome measure was type 2 diabetes as diagnosed using World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 30 months, and the 3-year cumulative incidences of diabetes were 55.0%, 39.3%, 40.5% and 39.5% in Groups 1-4, respectively. The relative risk reduction was 28.5% with LSM (95% CI 20.5-37.3, p=0.018), 26.4% with MET (95% CI 19.1-35.1, p=0.029) and 28.2% with LSM + MET (95% CI 20.3-37.0, p=0.022), as compared with the control group. The number needed to treat to prevent one incident case of diabetes was 6.4 for LSM, 6.9 for MET and 6.5 for LSM + MET. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Progression of IGT to diabetes is high in native Asian Indians. Both LSM and MET significantly reduced the incidence of diabetes in Asian Indians with IGT; there was no added benefit from combining them.
Authors: William C Knowler; Richard F Hamman; Sharon L Edelstein; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; David A Ehrmann; Elizabeth A Walker; Sarah E Fowler; David M Nathan; Steven E Kahn Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: A Ramachandran; C Snehalatha; A Kapur; V Vijay; V Mohan; A K Das; P V Rao; C S Yajnik; K M Prasanna Kumar; J D Nair Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: X R Pan; G W Li; Y H Hu; J X Wang; W Y Yang; Z X An; Z X Hu; J Lin; J Z Xiao; H B Cao; P A Liu; X G Jiang; Y Y Jiang; J P Wang; H Zheng; H Zhang; P H Bennett; B V Howard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: J Tuomilehto; J Lindström; J G Eriksson; T T Valle; H Hämäläinen; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Laakso; A Louheranta; M Rastas; V Salminen; M Uusitupa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas A Buchanan; Anny H Xiang; Ruth K Peters; Siri L Kjos; Aura Marroquin; Jose Goico; Cesar Ochoa; Sylvia Tan; Kathleen Berkowitz; Howard N Hodis; Stanley P Azen Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Vanita R Aroda; William C Knowler; Jill P Crandall; Leigh Perreault; Sharon L Edelstein; Susan L Jeffries; Mark E Molitch; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Christine Darwin; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Marinella Temprosa; Steven E Kahn; David M Nathan Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: J Lindström; M Peltonen; J G Eriksson; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Aunola; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Uusitupa; J Tuomilehto Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 10.122