OBJECTIVE: To describe the 1) lifestyle intervention used in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study, 2) short- and long-term changes in diet and exercise behavior, and 3) effect of the intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: There were 522 middle-aged, overweight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance who were randomized to either a usual care control group or an intensive lifestyle intervention group. The control group received general dietary and exercise advice at baseline and had an annual physician's examination. The subjects in the intervention group received additional individualized dietary counseling from a nutritionist. They were also offered circuit-type resistance training sessions and advised to increase overall physical activity. The intervention was the most intensive during the first year, followed by a maintenance period. The intervention goals were to reduce body weight, reduce dietary and saturated fat, and increase physical activity and dietary fiber. RESULTS: The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in each intervention goal. After 1 and 3 years, weight reductions were 4.5 and 3.5 kg in the intervention group and 1.0 and 0.9 kg in the control group, respectively. Measures of glycemia and lipemia improved more in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: The intensive lifestyle intervention produced long-term beneficial changes in diet, physical activity, and clinical and biochemical parameters and reduced diabetes risk. This type of intervention is a feasible option to prevent type 2 diabetes and should be implemented in the primary health care system.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To describe the 1) lifestyle intervention used in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study, 2) short- and long-term changes in diet and exercise behavior, and 3) effect of the intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: There were 522 middle-aged, overweight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance who were randomized to either a usual care control group or an intensive lifestyle intervention group. The control group received general dietary and exercise advice at baseline and had an annual physician's examination. The subjects in the intervention group received additional individualized dietary counseling from a nutritionist. They were also offered circuit-type resistance training sessions and advised to increase overall physical activity. The intervention was the most intensive during the first year, followed by a maintenance period. The intervention goals were to reduce body weight, reduce dietary and saturated fat, and increase physical activity and dietary fiber. RESULTS: The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in each intervention goal. After 1 and 3 years, weight reductions were 4.5 and 3.5 kg in the intervention group and 1.0 and 0.9 kg in the control group, respectively. Measures of glycemia and lipemia improved more in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: The intensive lifestyle intervention produced long-term beneficial changes in diet, physical activity, and clinical and biochemical parameters and reduced diabetes risk. This type of intervention is a feasible option to prevent type 2 diabetes and should be implemented in the primary health care system.
Authors: A R Cooper; S Sebire; A A Montgomery; T J Peters; D J Sharp; N Jackson; K Fitzsimons; C M Dayan; R C Andrews Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Corrine I Voils; Cynthia J Coffman; Janet M Grubber; David Edelman; Azita Sadeghpour; Matthew L Maciejewski; Jamiyla Bolton; Alex Cho; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; William S Yancy Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: J Lindström; M Peltonen; J G Eriksson; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Aunola; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Uusitupa; J Tuomilehto Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Julienne K Kirk; Timothy Craven; Edward W Lipkin; Jeffrey Katula; Carolyn Pedley; Patrick J O'Connor; Karen L Margolis Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 5.602