P D Miller1, N Pannacciulli2, J Malouf-Sierra3, A Singer4, E Czerwiński5, H G Bone6, C Wang2, S Huang2, A Chines2, W Lems7, J P Brown8. 1. Colorado Center for Bone Research, 13991 Jubilee Trail, Pine, CO, 80470, USA. millerccbr@gmail.com. 2. Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. 3. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. 5. Krakow Medical Center, Krakow, Poland. 6. Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA. 7. VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. CHU de Québec Research Centre and Laval University, QC, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
Transitioning postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from abisphosphonate to denosumab appears to be safe and more effective at improving BMD than continuing treatment with a bisphosphonate. INTRODUCTION: We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of four studies to estimate the efficacy and safety of transitioning to denosumab vs. continuing bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women who previously receivedoral bisphosphonates. METHODS: Patients received 60 mg denosumab once every 6 months or a bisphosphonate (oral alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, or intravenous zoledronic acid). Endpoints were change from baseline in lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and 1/3 radius BMD at month 12, change from baseline in serum CTX-1 and P1NP, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 2850 randomized patients (1424 bisphosphonate:1426 denosumab) were included in the analysis. Percentage change in BMD was significantly greater (p < 0.001) for denosumab vs. bisphosphonate at each skeletal site; differences in BMD changes ranged from 0.6 to 2.0%. Percentage decrease in serum CTX-1 and P1NP was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) for denosumab vs. bisphosphonate at months 1, 6, and 12; in the denosumab group only, percentage change in serum CTX-1 at month 1 was significantly correlated with percentage change in lumbar spine and total hip BMD at month 12. The incidences of adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Three patients (one bisphosphonate and two denosumab) had atypical femoral fractures, all from the denosumab vs. zoledronic acid study. CONCLUSION:Postmenopausal women can safely transition from a bisphosphonate to denosumab, which is more effective at improving BMD than continuing with a bisphosphonate. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00377819, NCT00919711, NCT00936897, NCT01732770.
RCT Entities:
Transitioning postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a bisphosphonate to denosumab appears to be safe and more effective at improving BMD than continuing treatment with a bisphosphonate. INTRODUCTION: We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of four studies to estimate the efficacy and safety of transitioning to denosumab vs. continuing bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women who previously received oral bisphosphonates. METHODS:Patients received 60 mg denosumab once every 6 months or a bisphosphonate (oral alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, or intravenous zoledronic acid). Endpoints were change from baseline in lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and 1/3 radius BMD at month 12, change from baseline in serum CTX-1 and P1NP, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 2850 randomized patients (1424 bisphosphonate:1426 denosumab) were included in the analysis. Percentage change in BMD was significantly greater (p < 0.001) for denosumab vs. bisphosphonate at each skeletal site; differences in BMD changes ranged from 0.6 to 2.0%. Percentage decrease in serum CTX-1 and P1NP was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) for denosumab vs. bisphosphonate at months 1, 6, and 12; in the denosumab group only, percentage change in serum CTX-1 at month 1 was significantly correlated with percentage change in lumbar spine and total hip BMD at month 12. The incidences of adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Three patients (one bisphosphonate and two denosumab) had atypical femoral fractures, all from the denosumab vs. zoledronic acid study. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women can safely transition from a bisphosphonate to denosumab, which is more effective at improving BMD than continuing with a bisphosphonate. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00377819, NCT00919711, NCT00936897, NCT01732770.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bisphosphonate; Bone mineral density; Denosumab; Pooled analysis; Postmenopausal women
Authors: Houchen Lyu; Bakr Jundi; Chang Xu; Sara K Tedeschi; Kazuki Yoshida; Sizheng Zhao; Sagar U Nigwekar; Benjamin Z Leder; Daniel H Solomon Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: N Udagawa; N Takahashi; H Yasuda; A Mizuno; K Itoh; Y Ueno; T Shinki; M T Gillespie; T J Martin; K Higashio; T Suda Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: H Yasuda; N Shima; N Nakagawa; K Yamaguchi; M Kinosaki; S Mochizuki; A Tomoyasu; K Yano; M Goto; A Murakami; E Tsuda; T Morinaga; K Higashio; N Udagawa; N Takahashi; T Suda Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-03-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David L Kendler; Christian Roux; Claude Laurent Benhamou; Jacques P Brown; Michael Lillestol; Suresh Siddhanti; Hoi-Shen Man; Javier San Martin; Henry G Bone Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: T L Burgess; Y Qian; S Kaufman; B D Ring; G Van; C Capparelli; M Kelley; H Hsu; W J Boyle; C R Dunstan; S Hu; D L Lacey Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 1999-05-03 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: P D Miller; N Pannacciulli; J P Brown; E Czerwinski; B S Nedergaard; M A Bolognese; J Malouf; H G Bone; J-Y Reginster; A Singer; C Wang; R B Wagman; S R Cummings Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Judith Everts-Graber; Harald Bonel; Daniel Lehmann; Brigitta Gahl; HansJörg Häuselmann; Ueli Studer; Hans-Rudolf Ziswiler; Stephan Reichenbach; Thomas Lehmann Journal: JBMR Plus Date: 2022-09-22
Authors: Pradeesh Sivapalan; Niklas R Jørgensen; Alexander G Mathioudakis; Josefin Eklöf; Therese Lapperre; Charlotte Suppli Ulrik; Helle F Andreassen; Karin Armbruster; Praleene Sivapalan; Julie Janner; Nina Godtfredsen; Ulla M Weinreich; Thyge L Nielsen; Niels Seersholm; Torgny Wilcke; Philipp Schuetz; Tobias W Klausen; Kristoffer Marså; Jørgen Vestbo; Jens-Ulrik Jensen Journal: Respir Res Date: 2020-10-12