Literature DB >> 24140847

An assessment of PTV margin based on actual accumulated dose for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Ning Wen1, Akila Kumarasiri, Teamour Nurushev, Jay Burmeister, Lei Xing, Dezhi Liu, Carri Glide-Hurst, Jinkoo Kim, Hualiang Zhong, Benjamin Movsas, Indrin J Chetty.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to present the results of a margin reduction study involving dosimetric and radiobiologic assessment of cumulative dose distributions, computed using an image guided adaptive radiotherapy based framework. Eight prostate cancer patients, treated with 7-9, 6 MV, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields, were included in this study. The workflow consists of cone beam CT (CBCT) based localization, deformable image registration of the CBCT to simulation CT image datasets (SIM-CT), dose reconstruction and dose accumulation on the SIM-CT, and plan evaluation using radiobiological models. For each patient, three IMRT plans were generated with different margins applied to the CTV. The PTV margin for the original plan was 10 mm and 6 mm at the prostate/anterior rectal wall interface (10/6 mm) and was reduced to: (a) 5/3 mm, and (b) 3 mm uniformly. The average percent reductions in predicted tumor control probability (TCP) in the accumulated (actual) plans in comparison to the original plans over eight patients were 0.4%, 0.7% and 11.0% with 10/6 mm, 5/3 mm and 3 mm uniform margin respectively. The mean increase in predicted normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for grades 2/3 rectal bleeding for the actual plans in comparison to the static plans with margins of 10/6, 5/3 and 3 mm uniformly was 3.5%, 2.8% and 2.4% respectively. For the actual dose distributions, predicted NTCP for late rectal bleeding was reduced by 3.6% on average when the margin was reduced from 10/6 mm to 5/3 mm, and further reduced by 1.0% on average when the margin was reduced to 3 mm. The average reduction in complication free tumor control probability (P+) in the actual plans in comparison to the original plans with margins of 10/6, 5/3 and 3 mm was 3.7%, 2.4% and 13.6% correspondingly. The significant reduction of TCP and P+ in the actual plan with 3 mm margin came from one outlier, where individualizing patient treatment plans through margin adaptation based on biological models, might yield higher quality treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24140847      PMCID: PMC4073000          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/21/7733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  18 in total

1.  Prediction of the benefits from dose-escalated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ali M Amer; Judith Mott; Ranald I Mackay; Peter C Williams; Jacqueline Livsey; John P Logue; Jolyon H Hendry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Evaluation of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technologies and their impact on the outcomes of hypofractionated prostate cancer treatments: a radiobiologic analysis.

Authors:  William Y Song; Bryan Schaly; Glenn Bauman; Jerry J Battista; Jake Van Dyk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Application of dose compensation in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Qiuwen Wu; Jian Liang; Di Yan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery.

Authors:  Michel Ghilezan; Di Yan; Jian Liang; David Jaffray; John Wong; Alvaro Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Investigation of bladder dose and volume factors influencing late urinary toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Rex Cheung; Susan L Tucker; Lei Dong; Renaud de Crevoisier; Andrew K Lee; Steven Frank; Rajat J Kudchadker; Howard Thames; Radhe Mohan; Deborah Kuban
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Peter W M Chung; Tara Haycocks; Tanya Brown; Zoe Cambridge; Valerie Kelly; Hamideh Alasti; David A Jaffray; Charles N Catton
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery.

Authors:  P Källman; A Agren; A Brahme
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Fitting late rectal bleeding data using different NTCP models: results from an Italian multi-centric study (AIROPROS0101).

Authors:  T Rancati; C Fiorino; G Gagliardi; G M Cattaneo; G Sanguineti; V Casanova Borca; C Cozzarini; G Fellin; F Foppiano; G Girelli; L Menegotti; A Piazzolla; V Vavassori; R Valdagni
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Essa Mayyas; Indrin J Chetty; Mikhail Chetvertkov; Ning Wen; Toni Neicu; Teamor Nurushev; Lei Ren; Mei Lu; Hans Stricker; Deepak Pradhan; Benjamin Movsas; Mohamed A Elshaikh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Evaluation of the deformation and corresponding dosimetric implications in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Ning Wen; Carri Glide-Hurst; Teamour Nurushev; Lei Xing; Jinkoo Kim; Hualiang Zhong; Dezhi Liu; Manju Liu; Jay Burmeister; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  11 in total

1.  Study of Asymmetric Margins in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Fuzzy Logic.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Patnaikuni; Sapan Mohan Saini; Rakesh Mohan Chandola; Pradeep Chandrakar; Vivek Chaudhary
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-20

Review 2.  Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Slav Yartsev; Glenn Bauman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Analysis of Prostate Deformation during a Course of Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Takuya Nakazawa; Kunihiko Tateoka; Yuichi Saito; Tadanori Abe; Masaki Yano; Yuji Yaegashi; Hirokazu Narimatsu; Kazunori Fujimoto; Akihiro Nakata; Kensei Nakata; Masanori Someya; Masakazu Hori; Masato Hareyama; Koichi Sakata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios.

Authors:  Y G Roussakis; H Dehghani; S Green; G J Webster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Deformable image registration and interobserver variation in contour propagation for radiation therapy planning.

Authors:  Adam C Riegel; Jeffrey G Antone; Honglai Zhang; Prachi Jain; Jagdeep Raince; Anthony Rea; Angelo M Bergamo; Ajay Kapur; Louis Potters
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Using daily diagnostic quality images to validate planning margins for prostate interfractional variations

Authors:  Wen Li; Andrew Vassil; Andrew Godley; Lama Muhieddine Mossolly; Qingyang Shang; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Modeling of Acute Rectal Toxicity to Compare Two Patient Positioning Methods for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: Can Toxicity Modeling be Used for Quality Assurance?

Authors:  X Liu; J Li; S E Schild; M H Schild; W Wong; S Vora; M G Herman; M Fatyga
Journal:  OMICS J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03

8.  Spatial and dosimetric evaluation of residual distortions of prostate and seminal vesicle bed after image-guided definitive and postoperative radiotherapy of prostate cancer with endorectal balloon.

Authors:  Sabine Levegrün; Christoph Pöttgen; Konstantinos Xydis; Maja Guberina; Jehad Abu Jawad; Martin Stuschke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT relative to bulk density assignment-based magnetic resonance-only approaches for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Joshua Kim; Kim Garbarino; Lonni Schultz; Kenneth Levin; Benjamin Movsas; M Salim Siddiqui; Indrin J Chetty; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Dosimetric advantages of daily adaptive strategy in IMPT for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tamura; Keiji Kobashi; Kentaro Nishioka; Takaaki Yoshimura; Takayuki Hashimoto; Shinichi Shimizu; Yoichi M Ito; Yoshikazu Maeda; Makoto Sasaki; Kazutaka Yamamoto; Hiroyasu Tamamura; Hidefumi Aoyama; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.