Literature DB >> 22863976

Evaluation of the deformation and corresponding dosimetric implications in prostate cancer treatment.

Ning Wen1, Carri Glide-Hurst, Teamour Nurushev, Lei Xing, Jinkoo Kim, Hualiang Zhong, Dezhi Liu, Manju Liu, Jay Burmeister, Benjamin Movsas, Indrin J Chetty.   

Abstract

The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging modality is an integral component of image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (IGART), which uses patient-specific dynamic/temporal information for potential treatment plan modification. In this study, an offline process for the integral component IGART framework has been implemented that consists of deformable image registration (DIR) and its validation, dose reconstruction, dose accumulation and dose verification. This study compares the differences between planned and estimated delivered doses under an IGART framework of five patients undergoing prostate cancer radiation therapy. The dose calculation accuracy on CBCT was verified by measurements made in a Rando pelvic phantom. The accuracy of DIR on patient image sets was evaluated in three ways: landmark matching with fiducial markers, visual image evaluation and unbalanced energy (UE); UE has been previously demonstrated to be a feasible method for the validation of DIR accuracy at a voxel level. The dose calculated on each CBCT image set was reconstructed and accumulated over all fractions to reflect the 'actual dose' delivered to the patient. The deformably accumulated (delivered) plans were then compared to the original (static) plans to evaluate tumor and normal tissue dose discrepancies. The results support the utility of adaptive planning, which can be used to fully elucidate the dosimetric impact based on the simulated delivered dose to achieve the desired tumor control and normal tissue sparing, which may be of particular importance in the context of hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22863976      PMCID: PMC3652266          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/17/5361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

1.  Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy.

Authors:  Patrick Kupelian; Twyla Willoughby; Arul Mahadevan; Toufik Djemil; Geoffrey Weinstein; Shirish Jani; Charles Enke; Timothy Solberg; Nicholas Flores; David Liu; David Beyer; Lisa Levine
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Eduard Schreibmann; Tianfang Li; Chuang Wang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  An adaptive off-line procedure for radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tonnis T Nuver; Mischa S Hoogeman; Peter Remeijer; Marcel van Herk; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Terry Peters; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Formulating adaptive radiation therapy (ART) treatment planning into a closed-loop control framework.

Authors:  Adam de la Zerda; Benjamin Armbruster; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy.

Authors:  Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning.

Authors:  Sua Yoo; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Investigation of bladder dose and volume factors influencing late urinary toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Rex Cheung; Susan L Tucker; Lei Dong; Renaud de Crevoisier; Andrew K Lee; Steven Frank; Rajat J Kudchadker; Howard Thames; Radhe Mohan; Deborah Kuban
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A study on adaptive IMRT treatment planning using kV cone-beam CT.

Authors:  George X Ding; Dennis M Duggan; Charles W Coffey; Matthew Deeley; Dennis E Hallahan; Anthony Cmelak; Arnold Malcolm
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Use of individual fraction size data from 3756 patients to directly determine the alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott G Williams; Jeremy M G Taylor; Ning Liu; Yolande Tra; Gillian M Duchesne; Larry L Kestin; Alvaro Martinez; Gary R Pratt; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  15 in total

1.  A Prospective Comparison of the Effects of Interfractional Variations on Proton Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Maryam Moteabbed; Alexei Trofimov; Gregory C Sharp; Yi Wang; Anthony L Zietman; Jason A Efstathiou; Hsiao-Ming Lu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Normal liver tissue change after proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu; Shinsei Takahashi; Toshiyuki Okumura; Toshiki Ishida; Keiko Nemoto Murofushi; Kayoko Ohnishi; Teruhito Aihara; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Koji Tsuboi; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Improving radiotherapy planning, delivery accuracy, and normal tissue sparing using cutting edge technologies.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Dosimetric verification of lung cancer treatment using the CBCTs estimated from limited-angle on-board projections.

Authors:  You Zhang; Fang-Fang Yin; Lei Ren
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  An assessment of PTV margin based on actual accumulated dose for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ning Wen; Akila Kumarasiri; Teamour Nurushev; Jay Burmeister; Lei Xing; Dezhi Liu; Carri Glide-Hurst; Jinkoo Kim; Hualiang Zhong; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Evaluation of gantry speed on image quality and imaging dose for 4D cone-beam CT acquisition.

Authors:  Andrew P Santoso; Kwang H Song; Yujiao Qin; Stephen J Gardner; Chang Liu; Indrin J Chetty; Benjamin Movsas; Munther Ajlouni; Ning Wen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR.

Authors:  Yoshiki Takayama; Noriyuki Kadoya; Takaya Yamamoto; Kengo Ito; Mizuki Chiba; Kousei Fujiwara; Yuya Miyasaka; Suguru Dobashi; Kiyokazu Sato; Ken Takeda; Keiichi Jingu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Registration error of the liver CT using deformable image registration of MIM Maestro and Velocity AI.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu; Kazunori Nitta; Toshiyuki Terunuma; Toshiyuki Okumura; Haruko Numajiri; Yoshiko Oshiro; Kayoko Ohnishi; Masashi Mizumoto; Teruhito Aihara; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Koji Tsuboi; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Dose mapping sensitivity to deformable registration uncertainties in fractionated radiotherapy - applied to prostate proton treatments.

Authors:  David Tilly; Nina Tilly; Anders Ahnesjö
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2013-06-14

10.  A quantitative comparison of the performance of three deformable registration algorithms in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniella Fabri; Valentina Zambrano; Amon Bhatia; Hugo Furtado; Helmar Bergmann; Markus Stock; Christoph Bloch; Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig; Supriyanto Pawiro; Dietmar Georg; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Michael Figl
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.