Literature DB >> 24136826

Visual activity predicts auditory recovery from deafness after adult cochlear implantation.

Kuzma Strelnikov1, Julien Rouger, Jean-François Demonet, Sebastien Lagleyre, Bernard Fraysse, Olivier Deguine, Pascal Barone.   

Abstract

Modern cochlear implantation technologies allow deaf patients to understand auditory speech; however, the implants deliver only a coarse auditory input and patients must use long-term adaptive processes to achieve coherent percepts. In adults with post-lingual deafness, the high progress of speech recovery is observed during the first year after cochlear implantation, but there is a large range of variability in the level of cochlear implant outcomes and the temporal evolution of recovery. It has been proposed that when profoundly deaf subjects receive a cochlear implant, the visual cross-modal reorganization of the brain is deleterious for auditory speech recovery. We tested this hypothesis in post-lingually deaf adults by analysing whether brain activity shortly after implantation correlated with the level of auditory recovery 6 months later. Based on brain activity induced by a speech-processing task, we found strong positive correlations in areas outside the auditory cortex. The highest positive correlations were found in the occipital cortex involved in visual processing, as well as in the posterior-temporal cortex known for audio-visual integration. The other area, which positively correlated with auditory speech recovery, was localized in the left inferior frontal area known for speech processing. Our results demonstrate that the visual modality's functional level is related to the proficiency level of auditory recovery. Based on the positive correlation of visual activity with auditory speech recovery, we suggest that visual modality may facilitate the perception of the word's auditory counterpart in communicative situations. The link demonstrated between visual activity and auditory speech perception indicates that visuoauditory synergy is crucial for cross-modal plasticity and fostering speech-comprehension recovery in adult cochlear-implanted deaf patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audio-visual; cochlear implant; plasticity; prediction; sensory loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136826     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  37 in total

1.  The role of the salience network in processing lexical and nonlexical stimuli in cochlear implant users: an ALE meta-analysis of PET studies.

Authors:  Jae-Jin Song; Sven Vanneste; Diane S Lazard; Paul Van de Heyning; Joo Hyun Park; Seung Ha Oh; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Adaptive benefit of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Ian M Wiggins; Pádraig T Kitterick; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Connectivity in Language Areas of the Brain in Cochlear Implant Users as Revealed by fNIRS.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Adnan Shah; Abd-Krim Seghouane; Xin Zhou; William Cross; Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Tracking the evolution of crossmodal plasticity and visual functions before and after sight restoration.

Authors:  Giulia Dormal; Franco Lepore; Mona Harissi-Dagher; Geneviève Albouy; Armando Bertone; Bruno Rossion; Olivier Collignon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Visual Reliance During Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users and Candidates.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara J Vasil; Christin Ray
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Erin Glennon; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Morgan N Parke; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Agathe Pralus; Ruben Hermann; Fanny Cholvy; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Annie Moulin; Pascal Barone; Nicolas Grimault; Eric Truy; Barbara Tillmann; Anne Caclin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.