Literature DB >> 24136193

Oxygenation advisor recommends appropriate positive end expiratory pressure and FIO2 settings: retrospective validation study.

Michael J Banner1, Neil R Euliano, David Grooms, A Daniel Martin, Nawar Al-Rawas, Andrea Gabrielli.   

Abstract

A decision support, rule-based oxygenation advisor that provides guidance for setting positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and fractional inhaled oxygen concentration (FIO2) for patients with respiratory failure is described. The target oxygenation goal is to achieve and maintain pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 88 and ≤ 95%, as posited by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, by recommending appropriate combinations of PEEP and FIO2. For patient safety, the oxygenation advisor monitors mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) to ensure it is ≥ 65 mmHg for hemodynamic stability and inspiratory plateau pressure (Pplt) so it is ≤ 30 cm H2O for lung protection. The purpose of this validation study was to compare attending physicians' recommendations to those recommendations of the oxygenation advisor for setting PEEP and FIO2. Adults with respiratory failure (n = 117) receiving ventilatory support were studied. PEEP, FIO2, SpO2, MAP, and Pplt are input variables into the advisor. Recommendations to increase, maintain, or decrease PEEP and FIO2 are the oxygenation advisor's output variables. Physicians' recommendations for setting PEEP and FIO2 were recorded; the oxygenation advisor's recommendations were also recorded for comparison. At all times, ventilator settings were based on recommendations from attending physicians. PEEP ranged from 2 to 22 cm H2O and FIO2 ranged from 0.30 to 0.65. A total of 326 recommendations by the oxygenation advisor and attending physicians were made to increase, maintain, or decrease PEEP and FIO2. There was a very significant relationship (p < 0.0001) between recommendations of the oxygenation advisor and attending physicians for setting PEEP and FIO2. The agreement rate for recommendations by the oxygenation advisor and attending physicians was 92%. The K statistic, a test of the strength of agreement of recommendations between the oxygenation advisor and attending physicians, was 0.82 (p < 0.0001), indicating "almost perfect agreement". Relationships for recommendations made by the oxygenation advisor and attending physicians for setting PEEP and FIO2 were excellent, PEEP: r = 0.98 (p < 0.01), r(2) = 0.96; FIO2: r = 0.91 (p < 0.01), r(2) = 0.83, bias and precision values were negligible. A novel oxygenation advisor provided continuous and automatic recommendations for setting PEEP and FIO2 that were shown to be as good as the clinical judgment of experienced attending physicians. For all patients, the target oxygenation goal was achieved. Concerning patient safety, the oxygenation advisor detected those occasions when MAP and Pplt were in potentially unsafe ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136193     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9518-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  19 in total

1.  Adaptive ventilator FiO2 advisor: use of non-invasive estimations of shunt.

Authors:  H F Kwok; D A Linkens; M Mahfouf; G H Mills
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 2.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

3.  An intelligent ventilation and oxygenation management system in neonatal intensive care using fuzzy trend template fitting.

Authors:  Suliman Yousef Belal; Azzam Fouad George Taktak; Andy Nevill; Andy Spencer
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Is 50% oxygen harmful?

Authors:  S D Register; J B Downs; M C Stock; R R Kirby
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Intelligent decision support systems for mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Fleur T Tehrani; James H Roum
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  The design and implementation of a ventilator-management advisor.

Authors:  G W Rutledge; G E Thomsen; B R Farr; M A Tovar; J X Polaschek; I A Beinlich; L B Sheiner; L M Fagan
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.326

9.  Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Roy G Brower; Paul N Lanken; Neil MacIntyre; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; Marek Ancukiewicz; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). A human trial.

Authors:  W Garner; J B Downs; M C Stock; J Räsänen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2014 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Patient characteristics and outcomes associated with adherence to the low PEEP/FIO2 table for acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Kay Choong See; Juliet Sahagun; Juvel Taculod
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.