Literature DB >> 18768304

Intelligent decision support systems for mechanical ventilation.

Fleur T Tehrani1, James H Roum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An overview of different methodologies used in various intelligent decision support systems (IDSSs) for mechanical ventilation is provided. The applications of the techniques are compared in view of today's intensive care unit (ICU) requirements.
METHODS: Information available in the literature is utilized to provide a methodological review of different systems.
RESULTS: Comparisons are made of different systems developed for specific ventilation modes as well as those intended for use in wider applications. The inputs and the optimized parameters of different systems are discussed and rule-based systems are compared to model-based techniques. The knowledge-based systems used for closed-loop control of weaning from mechanical ventilation are also described. Finally, in view of increasing trend towards automation of mechanical ventilation, the potential utility of intelligent advisory systems for this purpose is discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: IDSSs for mechanical ventilation can be quite helpful to clinicians in today's ICU settings. To be useful, such systems should be designed to be effective, safe, and easy to use at patient's bedside. In particular, these systems must be capable of noise removal, artifact detection and effective validation of data. Systems that can also be adapted for closed-loop control/weaning of patients at the discretion of the clinician, may have a higher potential for use in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18768304     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2008.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  12 in total

1.  A model-based decision support system for critiquing mechanical ventilation treatments.

Authors:  Fleur T Tehrani; Soraya Abbasi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Evaluation of a computerized system for mechanical ventilation of infants.

Authors:  Fleur T Tehrani; Soraya Abbasi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Retrospective evaluation of a decision support system for controlled mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Dan S Karbing; Charlotte Allerød; Lars P Thomsen; Kurt Espersen; Per Thorgaard; Steen Andreassen; Søren Kjærgaard; Stephen E Rees
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Automated mechanical ventilation: adapting decision making to different disease states.

Authors:  S Lozano-Zahonero; D Gottlieb; C Haberthür; J Guttmann; K Möller
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Computerised decision support for differential lung ventilation.

Authors:  Fleur T Tehrani
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2019-04-03

6.  Oxygenation advisor recommends appropriate positive end expiratory pressure and FIO2 settings: retrospective validation study.

Authors:  Michael J Banner; Neil R Euliano; David Grooms; A Daniel Martin; Nawar Al-Rawas; Andrea Gabrielli
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Decision support at home (DS@HOME)--system architectures and requirements.

Authors:  Michael Marschollek
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Development and implementation of explicit computerized protocols for mechanical ventilation in children.

Authors:  Philippe Jouvet; Patrice Hernert; Marc Wysocki
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  A data-driven acute inflammation therapy.

Authors:  Vladan Radosavljevic; Kosta Ristovski; Zoran Obradovic
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 10.  Can fuzzy logic make things more clear?

Authors:  Jan A Hazelzet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.