Literature DB >> 24135860

Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000-2010.

Jennifer F Kawwass1, Michael Monsour, Sara Crawford, Dmitry M Kissin, Donna R Session, Aniket D Kulkarni, Denise J Jamieson.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The prevalence of oocyte donation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) has increased in the United States, but little information is available regarding maternal or infant outcomes to improve counseling and clinical decision making.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify trends in donor oocyte cycles in the United States and to determine predictors of a good perinatal outcome among IVF cycles using fresh (noncryopreserved) embryos derived from donor oocytes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National ART Surveillance System, to which fertility centers are mandated to report and which includes data on more than 95% of all IVF cycles performed in the United States. Data from 2000 to 2010 described trends. Data from 2010 determined predictors. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Good perinatal outcome, defined as a singleton live-born infant delivered at 37 weeks or later and weighing 2500 g or more.
RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, data from 443 clinics (93% of all US fertility centers) were included. The annual number of donor oocyte cycles significantly increased, from 10,801 to 18,306. Among all donor oocyte cycles, an increasing trend was observed from 2000 to 2010 in the proportion of cycles using frozen (vs fresh) embryos (26.7% [95% CI, 25.8%-27.5%] to 40.3% [95% CI, 39.6%-41.1%]) and elective single-embryo transfers (vs transfer of multiple embryos) (0.8% [95% CI, 0.7%-1.0%] to 14.5% [95% CI, 14.0%-15.1%]). Good perinatal outcomes increased from 18.5% (95% CI, 17.7%-19.3%) to 24.4% (95% CI, 23.8%-25.1%) (P < .001 for all listed trends). Mean donor and recipient ages remained stable at 28 (SD, 2.8) years and 41 (SD, 5.3) years, respectively. In 2010, 396 clinics contributed data. For donor oocyte cycles using fresh embryos (n = 9865), 27.5% (95% CI, 26.6%-28.4%) resulted in good perinatal outcome. Transfer of an embryo at day 5 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.04-1.32]) and elective single-embryo transfers (adjusted OR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.92-2.80]) were positively associated with good perinatal outcome; tubal (adjusted OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.60-0.86]) or uterine (adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58-0.94]) factor infertility and non-Hispanic black recipient race/ethnicity (adjusted OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.35-0.67]) were associated with decreased odds of good outcome. Recipient age was not associated with likelihood of good perinatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the United States from 2000 to 2010, there was an increase in number of donor oocyte cycles, accompanied by an increase in good outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the factors associated with less successful outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24135860      PMCID: PMC4307377          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  23 in total

1.  Migration: the trends converge.

Authors: 
Journal:  OECD Obs       Date:  1985-09

2.  Does very advanced maternal age, with or without egg donation, really increase obstetric risk in a large tertiary center?

Authors:  Alon Shrim; Ishai Levin; Angela Mallozzi; Richard Brown; Kareima Salama; Ronni Gamzu; Benny Almog
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 1.901

3.  The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing.

Authors:  K S Joseph; Alexander C Allen; Linda Dodds; Linda Ann Turner; Heather Scott; Robert Liston
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older.

Authors:  S Ziadeh; A Yahaya
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Zhen Han; Sohail Mulla; Kellie E Murphy; Joseph Beyene; Arne Ohlsson
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Public reporting of clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs: implications for other medical and surgical procedures.

Authors:  Eli Y Adashi; Ron Wyden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome.

Authors:  Jane Cleary-Goldman; Fergal D Malone; John Vidaver; Robert H Ball; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; George R Saade; Keith A Eddleman; Susan Klugman; Lorraine Dugoff; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Sabrina D Craigo; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Diana W Bianchi; Mary D'Alton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Robert J Stillman; Kevin S Richter; Howard W Jones
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Pregnancy in the sixth decade of life: obstetric outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  Richard J Paulson; Robert Boostanfar; Peyman Saadat; Eliran Mor; David E Tourgeman; Cristin C Slater; Mary M Francis; John K Jain
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life.

Authors:  T J Matthews; Brady E Hamilton
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2009-08
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.

Authors:  Pamela M White
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Live birth in a 46 year old using autologous oocytes cryopreserved for a duration of 3 years: a case report documenting fertility preservation at an advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  Susan M Maxwell; Kara N Goldman; Patty A Labella; Caroline McCaffrey; Nicole L Noyes; James Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Selling blood and gametes during tough economic times: insights from Google search.

Authors:  Jonathan A Wu; Tin C Ngo; Cappy Rothman; Benjamin N Breyer; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Euploid rates among oocyte donors: is there an optimal age for donation?

Authors:  Luis R Hoyos; Connie Y Cheng; Kathleen Brennan; Gary Hubert; Brandon Wang; Richard P Buyalos; Molly Quinn; Mousa Shamonki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Pregnancy outcomes in very advanced maternal age pregnancies: the impact of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Sherri Jackson; Connie Hong; Erica T Wang; Carolyn Alexander; Kimberly D Gregory; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The impact of age beyond ploidy: outcome data from 8175 euploid single embryo transfers.

Authors:  Andres Reig; Jason Franasiak; Richard T Scott; Emre Seli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Intraovarian control of early folliculogenesis.

Authors:  Aaron J W Hsueh; Kazuhiro Kawamura; Yuan Cheng; Bart C J M Fauser
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Live birth and multiple birth rates in US in vitro fertilization treatment using donor oocytes: a comparison of single-embryo transfer and double-embryo transfer.

Authors:  V E Klenov; S L Boulet; R B Mejia; D M Kissin; E Munch; A Mancuso; B J Van Voorhis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  More than the oocyte source, egg donors as patients: a national picture of United States egg donors.

Authors:  Jennifer F Kawwass; Patrick Ten Eyck; Patrick Sieber; Heather S Hipp; Brad Van Voorhis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.

Authors:  Iris G Insogna; Andrea Lanes; Malinda S Lee; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Janis H Fox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.