PURPOSE: Tuberculosis treatments need to be shorter and overcome drug resistance. Our previous large scale phenotypic high-throughput screening against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) has identified 737 active compounds and thousands that are inactive. We have used this data for building computational models as an approach to minimize the number of compounds tested. METHODS: A cheminformatics clustering approach followed by Bayesian machine learning models (based on publicly available Mtb screening data) was used to illustrate that application of these models for screening set selections can enrich the hit rate. RESULTS: In order to explore chemical diversity around active cluster scaffolds of the dose-response hits obtained from our previous Mtb screens a set of 1924 commercially available molecules have been selected and evaluated for antitubercular activity and cytotoxicity using Vero, THP-1 and HepG2 cell lines with 4.3%, 4.2% and 2.7% hit rates, respectively. We demonstrate that models incorporating antitubercular and cytotoxicity data in Vero cells can significantly enrich the selection of non-toxic actives compared to random selection. Across all cell lines, the Molecular Libraries Small Molecule Repository (MLSMR) and cytotoxicity model identified ~10% of the hits in the top 1% screened (>10 fold enrichment). We also showed that seven out of nine Mtb active compounds from different academic published studies and eight out of eleven Mtb active compounds from a pharmaceutical screen (GSK) would have been identified by these Bayesian models. CONCLUSION: Combining clustering and Bayesian models represents a useful strategy for compound prioritization and hit-to lead optimization of antitubercular agents.
PURPOSE: Tuberculosis treatments need to be shorter and overcome drug resistance. Our previous large scale phenotypic high-throughput screening against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) has identified 737 active compounds and thousands that are inactive. We have used this data for building computational models as an approach to minimize the number of compounds tested. METHODS: A cheminformatics clustering approach followed by Bayesian machine learning models (based on publicly available Mtb screening data) was used to illustrate that application of these models for screening set selections can enrich the hit rate. RESULTS: In order to explore chemical diversity around active cluster scaffolds of the dose-response hits obtained from our previous Mtb screens a set of 1924 commercially available molecules have been selected and evaluated for antitubercular activity and cytotoxicity using Vero, THP-1 and HepG2 cell lines with 4.3%, 4.2% and 2.7% hit rates, respectively. We demonstrate that models incorporating antitubercular and cytotoxicity data in Vero cells can significantly enrich the selection of non-toxic actives compared to random selection. Across all cell lines, the Molecular Libraries Small Molecule Repository (MLSMR) and cytotoxicity model identified ~10% of the hits in the top 1% screened (>10 fold enrichment). We also showed that seven out of nine Mtb active compounds from different academic published studies and eight out of eleven Mtb active compounds from a pharmaceutical screen (GSK) would have been identified by these Bayesian models. CONCLUSION: Combining clustering and Bayesian models represents a useful strategy for compound prioritization and hit-to lead optimization of antitubercular agents.
Authors: Andreas Bender; Josef Scheiber; Meir Glick; John W Davies; Kamal Azzaoui; Jacques Hamon; Laszlo Urban; Steven Whitebread; Jeremy L Jenkins Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Sean Ekins; Justin Bradford; Krishna Dole; Anna Spektor; Kellan Gregory; David Blondeau; Moses Hohman; Barry A Bunin Journal: Mol Biosyst Date: 2010-02-09
Authors: Joseph A Maddry; Subramaniam Ananthan; Robert C Goldman; Judith V Hobrath; Cecil D Kwong; Clinton Maddox; Lynn Rasmussen; Robert C Reynolds; John A Secrist; Melinda I Sosa; E Lucile White; Wei Zhang Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 3.131
Authors: Scott G Franzblau; Mary Ann DeGroote; Sang Hyun Cho; Koen Andries; Eric Nuermberger; Ian M Orme; Khisimuzi Mdluli; Iñigo Angulo-Barturen; Thomas Dick; Veronique Dartois; Anne J Lenaerts Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 3.131
Authors: Alexander L Perryman; Jimmy S Patel; Riccardo Russo; Eric Singleton; Nancy Connell; Sean Ekins; Joel S Freundlich Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Thomas P Stratton; Alexander L Perryman; Catherine Vilchèze; Riccardo Russo; Shao-Gang Li; Jimmy S Patel; Eric Singleton; Sean Ekins; Nancy Connell; William R Jacobs; Joel S Freundlich Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Thomas Lane; Daniel P Russo; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Alexandru Korotcov; Valery Tkachenko; Robert C Reynolds; Alexander L Perryman; Joel S Freundlich; Sean Ekins Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Sean Ekins; Alex M Clark; Krishna Dole; Kellan Gregory; Andrew M Mcnutt; Anna Coulon Spektor; Charlie Weatherall; Nadia K Litterman; Barry A Bunin Journal: Methods Mol Biol Date: 2018