Sean Ekins1,2, Nadia K Litterman3, Christopher A Lipinski4, Barry A Bunin3. 1. Collaborative Drug Discovery, Inc., 1633 Bayshore Highway Suite 342, Burlingame, California, 94010, USA. ekinssean@yahoo.com. 2. Collaborations in Chemistry, 5616 Hilltop Needmore Road, Fuquay Varina, North Carolina, 27526, USA. ekinssean@yahoo.com. 3. Collaborative Drug Discovery, Inc., 1633 Bayshore Highway Suite 342, Burlingame, California, 94010, USA. 4. , 10 Connshire Drive, Waterford, Connecticut, 06385-4122, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We propose a framework with simple proxies to dissect the relative energy contributions responsible for standard drug discovery binding activity. METHODS: We explore a rule of thumb using hydrogen-bond donors, hydrogen-bond acceptors and rotatable bonds as relative proxies for the thermodynamic terms. We apply this methodology to several datasets (e.g., multiple small molecules profiled against kinases, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) high throughput screening (HTS) and structure based drug design (SBDD) derived compounds, and FDA approved drugs). RESULTS: We found that Mtb active compounds developed through SBDD methods had statistically significantly larger PEnthalpy values than HTS derived compounds, suggesting these compounds had relatively more hydrogen bond donor and hydrogen bond acceptors compared to rotatable bonds. In recent FDA approved medicines we found that compounds identified via target-based approaches had a more balanced enthalpic relationship between these descriptors compared to compounds identified via phenotypic screens CONCLUSIONS: As it is common to experimentally optimize directly for total binding energy, these computational methods provide alternative calculations and approaches useful for compound optimization alongside other common metrics in available software and databases.
PURPOSE: We propose a framework with simple proxies to dissect the relative energy contributions responsible for standard drug discovery binding activity. METHODS: We explore a rule of thumb using hydrogen-bond donors, hydrogen-bond acceptors and rotatable bonds as relative proxies for the thermodynamic terms. We apply this methodology to several datasets (e.g., multiple small molecules profiled against kinases, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) high throughput screening (HTS) and structure based drug design (SBDD) derived compounds, and FDA approved drugs). RESULTS: We found that Mtb active compounds developed through SBDD methods had statistically significantly larger PEnthalpy values than HTS derived compounds, suggesting these compounds had relatively more hydrogen bond donor and hydrogen bond acceptors compared to rotatable bonds. In recent FDA approved medicines we found that compounds identified via target-based approaches had a more balanced enthalpic relationship between these descriptors compared to compounds identified via phenotypic screens CONCLUSIONS: As it is common to experimentally optimize directly for total binding energy, these computational methods provide alternative calculations and approaches useful for compound optimization alongside other common metrics in available software and databases.
Entities:
Keywords:
enthalpy; entropy; high-throughput screening; structure based drug design; tuberculosis
Authors: Mindy I Davis; Jeremy P Hunt; Sanna Herrgard; Pietro Ciceri; Lisa M Wodicka; Gabriel Pallares; Michael Hocker; Daniel K Treiber; Patrick P Zarrinkar Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2011-10-30 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Wei Zheng; Janak Padia; Daniel J Urban; Ajit Jadhav; Ozlem Goker-Alpan; Anton Simeonov; Ehud Goldin; Douglas Auld; Mary E LaMarca; James Inglese; Christopher P Austin; Ellen Sidransky Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sean Ekins; Justin Bradford; Krishna Dole; Anna Spektor; Kellan Gregory; David Blondeau; Moses Hohman; Barry A Bunin Journal: Mol Biosyst Date: 2010-02-09
Authors: Joseph A Maddry; Subramaniam Ananthan; Robert C Goldman; Judith V Hobrath; Cecil D Kwong; Clinton Maddox; Lynn Rasmussen; Robert C Reynolds; John A Secrist; Melinda I Sosa; E Lucile White; Wei Zhang Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 3.131
Authors: Valère Lounnas; Tina Ritschel; Jan Kelder; Ross McGuire; Robert P Bywater; Nicolas Foloppe Journal: Comput Struct Biotechnol J Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 7.271
Authors: Sean Ekins; Alex M Clark; Krishna Dole; Kellan Gregory; Andrew M Mcnutt; Anna Coulon Spektor; Charlie Weatherall; Nadia K Litterman; Barry A Bunin Journal: Methods Mol Biol Date: 2018
Authors: Christopher D McCune; Su Jing Chan; Matthew L Beio; Weijun Shen; Woo Jin Chung; Laura M Szczesniak; Chou Chai; Shu Qing Koh; Peter T-H Wong; David B Berkowitz Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 14.553