Literature DB >> 17477341

Analysis of pharmacology data and the prediction of adverse drug reactions and off-target effects from chemical structure.

Andreas Bender1, Josef Scheiber, Meir Glick, John W Davies, Kamal Azzaoui, Jacques Hamon, Laszlo Urban, Steven Whitebread, Jeremy L Jenkins.   

Abstract

Preclinical Safety Pharmacology (PSP) attempts to anticipate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during early phases of drug discovery by testing compounds in simple, in vitro binding assays (that is, preclinical profiling). The selection of PSP targets is based largely on circumstantial evidence of their contribution to known clinical ADRs, inferred from findings in clinical trials, animal experiments, and molecular studies going back more than forty years. In this work we explore PSP chemical space and its relevance for the prediction of adverse drug reactions. Firstly, in silico (computational) Bayesian models for 70 PSP-related targets were built, which are able to detect 93% of the ligands binding at IC(50) < or = 10 microM at an overall correct classification rate of about 94%. Secondly, employing the World Drug Index (WDI), a model for adverse drug reactions was built directly based on normalized side-effect annotations in the WDI, which does not require any underlying functional knowledge. This is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to predict adverse drug reactions across hundreds of categories from chemical structure alone. On average 90% of the adverse drug reactions observed with known, clinically used compounds were detected, an overall correct classification rate of 92%. Drugs withdrawn from the market (Rapacuronium, Suprofen) were tested in the model and their predicted ADRs align well with known ADRs. The analysis was repeated for acetylsalicylic acid and Benperidol which are still on the market. Importantly, features of the models are interpretable and back-projectable to chemical structure, raising the possibility of rationally engineering out adverse effects. By combining PSP and ADR models new hypotheses linking targets and adverse effects can be proposed and examples for the opioid mu and the muscarinic M2 receptors, as well as for cyclooxygenase-1 are presented. It is hoped that the generation of predictive models for adverse drug reactions is able to help support early SAR to accelerate drug discovery and decrease late stage attrition in drug discovery projects. In addition, models such as the ones presented here can be used for compound profiling in all development stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17477341     DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200700026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemMedChem        ISSN: 1860-7179            Impact factor:   3.466


  87 in total

Review 1.  The influence of the 'organizational factor' on compound quality in drug discovery.

Authors:  Paul D Leeson; Stephen A St-Gallay
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  kNNsim: k-nearest neighbors similarity with genetic algorithm features optimization enhances the prediction of activity classes for small molecules.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczynski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Comparison of ultra-fast 2D and 3D ligand and target descriptors for side effect prediction and network analysis in polypharmacology.

Authors:  Alvaro Cortés-Cabrera; Garrett M Morris; Paul W Finn; Antonio Morreale; Federico Gago
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Anticancer potency of nitric oxide-releasing liposomes.

Authors:  Dakota J Suchyta; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Interaction network among functional drug groups.

Authors:  Minho Lee; Keunwan Park; Dongsup Kim
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2013-10-16

6.  Bayesian models leveraging bioactivity and cytotoxicity information for drug discovery.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Robert C Reynolds; Hiyun Kim; Mi-Sun Koo; Marilyn Ekonomidis; Meliza Talaue; Steve D Paget; Lisa K Woolhiser; Anne J Lenaerts; Barry A Bunin; Nancy Connell; Joel S Freundlich
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2013-03-21

7.  A novel chemogenomics analysis of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their ligands: a potential strategy for receptor de-orphanization.

Authors:  Eelke van der Horst; Julio E Peironcely; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Margot W Beukers; Jonathan R Lane; Herman W T van Vlijmen; Michael T M Emmerich; Yasushi Okuno; Andreas Bender
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  The chemical basis of pharmacology.

Authors:  Michael J Keiser; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Challenges predicting ligand-receptor interactions of promiscuous proteins: the nuclear receptor PXR.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Sandhya Kortagere; Manisha Iyer; Erica J Reschly; Markus A Lill; Matthew R Redinbo; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs.

Authors:  Michael Kuhn; Monica Campillos; Ivica Letunic; Lars Juhl Jensen; Peer Bork
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.