INTRODUCTION: Prostate biopsies are usually taken from the peripheral rather than anterior region of the prostate. Consequently, tumors originating from the anterior apical region and transition zones may be under-sampled. We examined whether addition of transrectal anterior biopsy (TAB) would improve efficacy of prostate biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulations of TAB and sextant biopsy (SB) were performed using computer models of 86 autopsy prostates (AP) and 40 radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. TAB was obtained bilaterally from apex, mid, and base regions by advancing the biopsy needle 5 mm-35 mm beyond the prostatic capsule. A phase I clinical trial with 114 patients was conducted to determine the performance of an extended biopsy protocol consisting of TAB, SB, and laterally-directed biopsy (LDB). RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rates of SB and TAB were 33% and 55% for AP series (p = 0.00003); 60% and 88% for RP series (p = 0.006). Alternatively, SB + bilateral apical TAB and SB + bilateral mid TAB had cancer detection rates of 45% and 42% for AP series; 80% and 78% for RP series. The extended biopsy protocol detected cancer in 33% (38/114) of patients with 29, 25, and 15 diagnosed by SB, LDB, and bilateral apical TAB, respectively. Patients diagnosed by bilateral apical TAB versus SB (p = 0.01) and LDB (p = 0.02) were statistically significant. Without bilateral apical TAB, the overall cancer detection rate decreased to 30% (34/114). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of bilateral TAB from apical region for first time and repeat prostate biopsies may increase diagnosis of prostate cancer. The clinical significance of these findings needs further investigations and clinical follow up.
INTRODUCTION: Prostate biopsies are usually taken from the peripheral rather than anterior region of the prostate. Consequently, tumors originating from the anterior apical region and transition zones may be under-sampled. We examined whether addition of transrectal anterior biopsy (TAB) would improve efficacy of prostate biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulations of TAB and sextant biopsy (SB) were performed using computer models of 86 autopsy prostates (AP) and 40 radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. TAB was obtained bilaterally from apex, mid, and base regions by advancing the biopsy needle 5 mm-35 mm beyond the prostatic capsule. A phase I clinical trial with 114 patients was conducted to determine the performance of an extended biopsy protocol consisting of TAB, SB, and laterally-directed biopsy (LDB). RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rates of SB and TAB were 33% and 55% for AP series (p = 0.00003); 60% and 88% for RP series (p = 0.006). Alternatively, SB + bilateral apical TAB and SB + bilateral mid TAB had cancer detection rates of 45% and 42% for AP series; 80% and 78% for RP series. The extended biopsy protocol detected cancer in 33% (38/114) of patients with 29, 25, and 15 diagnosed by SB, LDB, and bilateral apical TAB, respectively. Patients diagnosed by bilateral apical TAB versus SB (p = 0.01) and LDB (p = 0.02) were statistically significant. Without bilateral apical TAB, the overall cancer detection rate decreased to 30% (34/114). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of bilateral TAB from apical region for first time and repeat prostate biopsies may increase diagnosis of prostate cancer. The clinical significance of these findings needs further investigations and clinical follow up.
Authors: E David Crawford; Kyle O Rove; Al B Barqawi; Paul D Maroni; Priya N Werahera; Craig A Baer; Hari K Koul; Cory A Rove; M Scott Lucia; Francisco G La Rosa Journal: Prostate Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Nozomu Kawata; Gary J Miller; E David Crawford; Kathleen C Torkko; J Scott Stewart; M Scott Lucia; Heidi L Miller; Daisaku Hirano; Priya N Werahera Journal: Prostate Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: M B Opell; J Zeng; J J Bauer; R R Connelly; W Zhang; I A Sesterhenn; S K Mun; J W Moul; J H Lynch Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2002 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hadi Rezaeilouyeh; Mohammad H Mahoor; Jun Jason Zhang; Francisco G La Rosa; Samuel Chang; Priya N Werahera Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2014
Authors: Amin Ali; Alexander Du Feu; Pedro Oliveira; Ananya Choudhury; Robert G Bristow; Esther Baena Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 14.432