Chethan Bachireddy1, Michael C Soule2, Jacob M Izenberg1, Sergey Dvoryak3, Konstantin Dumchev4, Frederick L Altice5. 1. Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, USA. 2. Massachussetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, USA. 3. Ukrainian Institute on Public Health Policy, Kyiv, Ukraine. 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kyiv, Ukraine. 5. Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, USA; Yale University School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, USA. Electronic address: frederick.altice@yale.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:People who inject drugs (PWID) experience poor outcomes and fuel HIV epidemics in middle-income countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. We assess integrated/co-located (ICL) healthcare for HIV-infected PWID, which despite international recommendations, is neither widely available nor empirically examined. METHODS:A 2010 cross-sectional study randomly sampled 296 HIV-infected opioid-dependent PWID from two representative HIV-endemic regions in Ukraine where ICL, non-co-located (NCL) and harm reduction/outreach (HRO) settings are available. ICL settings provide onsite HIV, addiction, and tuberculosis services, NCLs only treat addiction, and HROs provide counseling, needles/syringes, and referrals, but no opioid substitution therapy (OST). The primary outcome was receipt of quality healthcare, measured using a quality healthcare indicator (QHI) composite score representing percentage of eight guidelines-based recommended indicators met for HIV, addiction and tuberculosis treatment. The secondary outcomes were individual QHIs and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). RESULTS: On average, ICL-participants had significantly higher QHI composite scores compared to NCL- and HRO-participants (71.9% versus 54.8% versus 37.0%, p<0.001) even after controlling for potential confounders. Compared to NCL-participants, ICL-participants were significantly more likely to receive antiretroviral therapy (49.5% versus 19.2%, p<0.001), especially if CD4 ≤ 200 (93.8% versus 62.5% p<0.05); guideline-recommended OST dosage (57.3% versus 41.4%, p<0.05); and isoniazid preventive therapy (42.3% versus 11.2%, p<0.001). Subjects receiving OST had significantly higher HRQoL than those not receiving it (p<0.001); however, HRQoL did not differ significantly between ICL- and NCL-participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that OST alone improves quality-of-life, while receiving care in integrated settings collectively and individually improves healthcare quality indicators for PWID.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:People who inject drugs (PWID) experience poor outcomes and fuel HIV epidemics in middle-income countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. We assess integrated/co-located (ICL) healthcare for HIV-infected PWID, which despite international recommendations, is neither widely available nor empirically examined. METHODS: A 2010 cross-sectional study randomly sampled 296 HIV-infected opioid-dependent PWID from two representative HIV-endemic regions in Ukraine where ICL, non-co-located (NCL) and harm reduction/outreach (HRO) settings are available. ICL settings provide onsite HIV, addiction, and tuberculosis services, NCLs only treat addiction, and HROs provide counseling, needles/syringes, and referrals, but no opioid substitution therapy (OST). The primary outcome was receipt of quality healthcare, measured using a quality healthcare indicator (QHI) composite score representing percentage of eight guidelines-based recommended indicators met for HIV, addiction and tuberculosis treatment. The secondary outcomes were individual QHIs and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). RESULTS: On average, ICL-participants had significantly higher QHI composite scores compared to NCL- and HRO-participants (71.9% versus 54.8% versus 37.0%, p<0.001) even after controlling for potential confounders. Compared to NCL-participants, ICL-participants were significantly more likely to receive antiretroviral therapy (49.5% versus 19.2%, p<0.001), especially if CD4 ≤ 200 (93.8% versus 62.5% p<0.05); guideline-recommended OST dosage (57.3% versus 41.4%, p<0.05); and isoniazid preventive therapy (42.3% versus 11.2%, p<0.001). Subjects receiving OST had significantly higher HRQoL than those not receiving it (p<0.001); however, HRQoL did not differ significantly between ICL- and NCL-participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that OST alone improves quality-of-life, while receiving care in integrated settings collectively and individually improves healthcare quality indicators for PWID.
Authors: Sasha Uhlmann; M-J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Ruth Zhang; Silvia Guillemi; David Marsh; Robert S Hogg; Julio S G Montaner; Evan Wood Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Joseph B Babigumira; Barbara Castelnuovo; Andy Stergachis; Agnes Kiragga; Petra Shaefer; Mohammed Lamorde; Andrew Kambugu; Alice Muwanga; Louis P Garrison Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Farrah Khan; Archana Krishnan; Mansur A Ghani; Jeffrey A Wickersham; Jeannia J Fu; Sin How Lim; Sangeeth Kaur Dhaliwal; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Frederick L Altice Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Mina Psichogiou; George Giallouros; Katerina Pantavou; Eirini Pavlitina; Martha Papadopoulou; Leslie D Williams; Andria Hadjikou; Eleni Kakalou; Athanasios Skoutelis; Konstantinos Protopapas; Anastasia Antoniadou; George Boulmetis; Dimitrios Paraskevis; Angelos Hatzakis; Samuel R Friedman; Georgios K Nikolopoulos Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2019-04-02
Authors: Olena Iakunchykova; Anna Meteliuk; Alexei Zelenev; Alyona Mazhnaya; Melissa Tracy; Frederick L Altice Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2018-04-12
Authors: Benjamin J Oldfield; Nicolas Muñoz; Mark P McGovern; Melissa Funaro; Merceditas Villanueva; Jeanette M Tetrault; E Jennifer Edelman Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.177