Alyona Mazhnaya1, Martha J Bojko2, Ruthanne Marcus2, Sergii Filippovych1, Zahedsul Islam3, Sergey Dvoriak4, Frederick L Altice5. 1. ICF International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. 2. Yale University School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Management Science for Health, USA. 4. Ukrainian Institute for Public Health Policy, Kyiv, Ukraine. 5. Yale University School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale University School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To understand how perceived law enforcement policies and practices contribute to the low rates of utilization of opioid agonist therapies (OAT) among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in Ukraine. METHODS: Qualitative data from 25 focus groups (FGs) with 199 opioid-dependent PWIDs in Ukraine examined domains related to lived or learned experiences with OAT, police, arrest, incarceration, and criminal activity were analyzed using grounded theory principles. FINDINGS: Most participants were male (66%), in their late 30s, and previously incarcerated (85%) mainly for drug-related activities. When imprisoned, PWIDs perceived themselves as being "addiction-free". After prison-release, the confluence of police surveillance, societal stress contributed to participants' drug use relapse, perpetuating a cycle of searching for money and drugs, followed by re-arrest and re-incarceration. Fear of police and arrest both facilitated OAT entry and simultaneously contributed to avoiding OAT since system-level requirements identified OAT clients as targets for police harassment. OAT represents an evidence-based option to 'break the cycle', however, law enforcement practices still thwart OAT capacity to improve individual and public health. CONCLUSION: In the absence of structural changes in law enforcement policies and practices in Ukraine, PWIDs will continue to avoid OAT and perpetuate the addiction cycle with high imprisonment rates.
AIMS: To understand how perceived law enforcement policies and practices contribute to the low rates of utilization of opioid agonist therapies (OAT) among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in Ukraine. METHODS: Qualitative data from 25 focus groups (FGs) with 199 opioid-dependent PWIDs in Ukraine examined domains related to lived or learned experiences with OAT, police, arrest, incarceration, and criminal activity were analyzed using grounded theory principles. FINDINGS: Most participants were male (66%), in their late 30s, and previously incarcerated (85%) mainly for drug-related activities. When imprisoned, PWIDs perceived themselves as being "addiction-free". After prison-release, the confluence of police surveillance, societal stress contributed to participants' drug use relapse, perpetuating a cycle of searching for money and drugs, followed by re-arrest and re-incarceration. Fear of police and arrest both facilitated OAT entry and simultaneously contributed to avoiding OAT since system-level requirements identified OAT clients as targets for police harassment. OAT represents an evidence-based option to 'break the cycle', however, law enforcement practices still thwart OAT capacity to improve individual and public health. CONCLUSION: In the absence of structural changes in law enforcement policies and practices in Ukraine, PWIDs will continue to avoid OAT and perpetuate the addiction cycle with high imprisonment rates.
Entities:
Keywords:
Addiction; Ukraine; addiction trajectories; opioid agonist treatment; opioid substitution treatment; people who inject drugs; police harassment; qualitative research
Authors: Olga Morozova; Lyuba Azbel; Yevgeny Grishaev; Sergii Dvoryak; Jeffrey A Wickersham; Frederick L Altice Journal: Int J Prison Health Date: 2013
Authors: Sasha Uhlmann; M-J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Ruth Zhang; Silvia Guillemi; David Marsh; Robert S Hogg; Julio S G Montaner; Evan Wood Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: R S Broadhead; D D Heckathorn; D L Weakliem; D L Anthony; H Madray; R J Mills; J Hughes Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Michael S Gordon; Timothy W Kinlock; Robert P Schwartz; Terrence T Fitzgerald; Kevin E O'Grady; Frank J Vocci Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Olena Iakunchykova; Anna Meteliuk; Alexei Zelenev; Alyona Mazhnaya; Melissa Tracy; Frederick L Altice Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2018-04-12
Authors: Julia Rozanova; Olga Morozova; Lyuba Azbel; Chethan Bachireddy; Jacob M Izenberg; Tetiana Kiriazova; Sergiy Dvoryak; Frederick L Altice Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Trena I Mukherjee; Jeffrey A Wickersham; Mayur M Desai; Veena Pillai; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Frederick L Altice Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 4.492