Olena Iakunchykova1, Anna Meteliuk2, Alexei Zelenev3, Alyona Mazhnaya4, Melissa Tracy5, Frederick L Altice6. 1. School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY, USA. Electronic address: olenauak@ukr.net. 2. ICF Alliance for Public Health, Kyiv, Ukraine. 3. Yale University School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. ICF Alliance for Public Health, Kyiv, Ukraine; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY, USA. 6. Yale University School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale University School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA; University of Malaya, Centre of Excellence on Research in AIDS (CERiA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among the estimated 340,000 people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine, HCV prevalence is approximately 70%. As HCV treatment availability increases, an assessment of the HCV treatment cascade is needed to guide HCV prevention and treatment strategies. METHODS: Opioid dependent PWID were interviewed and tested for HIV and HCV in five Ukrainian cities from January 2014 to March 2015. Logistic regression was used to examine the independent correlates of two cascade steps: a) anti-HCV positive status awareness; b) chronic HCV confirmation; and of c) annual HCV testing for PWID. RESULTS: Among 1613 PWID, 1002 (62.1%) had anti-HCV positive test result, of which 568 (56.7%) were aware of it before the study and 346 (34.5%) reported previous confirmatory testing for chronic HCV. Independent correlates of being aware they had anti-HCV positivity included: current [AOR: 3.08; 95%CI: 2.16-4.40] or prior [AOR: 1.85; 95%CI: 1.27-2.68] opioid agonistic treatment (OAT) experience, relative to no prior OAT, living in Lviv [AOR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.31-0.81] or Odesa [AOR: 2.73; 95%CI: 1.51-4.93] relative to Kyiv and being aware of having HIV [AOR: 4.10; 95%CI: 2.99-5.62]. Independent correlates of confirming HCV infection among those who were aware of their anti-HCV positive status included: current OAT [AOR: 2.00; 95%CI: 1.24-3.23], relative to prior OAT, the middle income category [AOR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.15-2.63], relative to the lowest, and receiving ART [AOR: 4.54; 95%CI: 2.85-7.23]. Among 1613 PWID, 918 (56.9%) were either HCV negative or not aware of their HCV positive status, of which 198 (21.6%) reported recent anti-HCV test (during last 12 month). Recent anti-HCV test in this group was associated with current [AOR: 7.17; 95%CI: 4.63-11.13] or prior [AOR: 2.24; 95%CI: 1.32-3.81] OAT experience, relative to no prior OAT. CONCLUSION: Encouraging PWID to participate in OAT may be an effective strategy to diagnose and link PWID who are HCV positive to care. Among HIV negative participants, regular HCV testing may be ensured by participation in OAT. More studies are needed to assess HCV treatment utilization among PWID in Ukraine and OAT as a possible way to retain them in treatment.
BACKGROUND: Among the estimated 340,000 people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine, HCV prevalence is approximately 70%. As HCV treatment availability increases, an assessment of the HCV treatment cascade is needed to guide HCV prevention and treatment strategies. METHODS: Opioid dependent PWID were interviewed and tested for HIV and HCV in five Ukrainian cities from January 2014 to March 2015. Logistic regression was used to examine the independent correlates of two cascade steps: a) anti-HCV positive status awareness; b) chronic HCV confirmation; and of c) annual HCV testing for PWID. RESULTS: Among 1613 PWID, 1002 (62.1%) had anti-HCV positive test result, of which 568 (56.7%) were aware of it before the study and 346 (34.5%) reported previous confirmatory testing for chronic HCV. Independent correlates of being aware they had anti-HCV positivity included: current [AOR: 3.08; 95%CI: 2.16-4.40] or prior [AOR: 1.85; 95%CI: 1.27-2.68] opioid agonistic treatment (OAT) experience, relative to no prior OAT, living in Lviv [AOR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.31-0.81] or Odesa [AOR: 2.73; 95%CI: 1.51-4.93] relative to Kyiv and being aware of having HIV [AOR: 4.10; 95%CI: 2.99-5.62]. Independent correlates of confirming HCV infection among those who were aware of their anti-HCV positive status included: current OAT [AOR: 2.00; 95%CI: 1.24-3.23], relative to prior OAT, the middle income category [AOR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.15-2.63], relative to the lowest, and receiving ART [AOR: 4.54; 95%CI: 2.85-7.23]. Among 1613 PWID, 918 (56.9%) were either HCV negative or not aware of their HCV positive status, of which 198 (21.6%) reported recent anti-HCV test (during last 12 month). Recent anti-HCV test in this group was associated with current [AOR: 7.17; 95%CI: 4.63-11.13] or prior [AOR: 2.24; 95%CI: 1.32-3.81] OAT experience, relative to no prior OAT. CONCLUSION: Encouraging PWID to participate in OAT may be an effective strategy to diagnose and link PWID who are HCV positive to care. Among HIV negative participants, regular HCV testing may be ensured by participation in OAT. More studies are needed to assess HCV treatment utilization among PWID in Ukraine and OAT as a possible way to retain them in treatment.
Authors: Sunil Suhas Solomon; Shruti H Mehta; Aylur K Srikrishnan; Suniti Solomon; Allison M McFall; Oliver Laeyendecker; David D Celentano; Syed H Iqbal; Santhanam Anand; Canjeevaram K Vasudevan; Shanmugam Saravanan; Gregory M Lucas; Muniratnam S Kumar; Mark S Sulkowski; Thomas C Quinn Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Jeffrey D Stanaway; Abraham D Flaxman; Mohsen Naghavi; Christina Fitzmaurice; Theo Vos; Ibrahim Abubakar; Laith J Abu-Raddad; Reza Assadi; Neeraj Bhala; Benjamin Cowie; Mohammad H Forouzanfour; Justina Groeger; Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Jennifer MacLachlan; Reza Malekzadeh; Natasha K Martin; Ali A Mokdad; Ali H Mokdad; Christopher J L Murray; Dietrich Plass; Saleem Rana; David B Rein; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Juan Sanabria; Mete Saylan; Saeid Shahraz; Samuel So; Vasiliy V Vlassov; Elisabete Weiderpass; Steven T Wiersma; Mustafa Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Graham S Cooke Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Wendy Zhang; Nadia O'Brien; Jamie I Forrest; Kate A Salters; Thomas L Patterson; Julio S G Montaner; Robert S Hogg; Viviane D Lima Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Judith I Tsui; Richard Saitz; Debbie M Cheng; David Nunes; Howard Libman; Julie K Alperen; Jeffrey H Samet Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sunil Suhas Solomon; Thomas C Quinn; Suniti Solomon; Allison M McFall; Aylur K Srikrishnan; Vinita Verma; Muniratnam S Kumar; Oliver Laeyendecker; David D Celentano; Syed H Iqbal; Santhanam Anand; Canjeevaram K Vasudevan; Shanmugam Saravanan; David L Thomas; Kuldeep Singh Sachdeva; Gregory M Lucas; Shruti H Mehta Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Adam Trickey; Nadiya Semchuk; Tetiana Saliuk; Yana Sazonova; Olga Varetska; Josephine G Walker; Aaron G Lim; Jack Stone; Peter Vickerman Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 5.396