Literature DB >> 24128188

Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction.

Andrea L Meltzer1, James K McNulty2, Grace L Jackson3, Benjamin R Karney3.   

Abstract

Do men value physical attractiveness in a mate more than women? Scientists in numerous disciplines believe that they do, but recent research using speed-dating paradigms suggests that males and females are equally influenced by physical attractiveness when choosing potential mates. Nevertheless, the premise of the current work is that sex differences in the importance of physical attractiveness are most likely to emerge in research on long-term relationships. Accordingly, the current work drew from 4 independent, longitudinal studies to examine sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for trajectories of marital satisfaction. In all 4 studies, both partners' physical attractiveness was objectively rated at baseline, and both partners reported their marital satisfaction up to 8 times over the first 4 years of marriage. Whereas husbands were more satisfied at the beginning of the marriage and remained more satisfied over the next 4 years to the extent that they had an attractive wife, wives were no more or less satisfied initially or over the next 4 years to the extent that they had an attractive husband. Most importantly, a direct test indicated that partner physical attractiveness played a larger role in predicting husbands' satisfaction than predicting wives' satisfaction. These findings strengthen support for the idea that sex differences in self-reported preferences for physical attractiveness do have implications for long-term relationship outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24128188      PMCID: PMC4011637          DOI: 10.1037/a0034424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  37 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-01

3.  Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction.

Authors:  L A Pasch; T N Bradbury
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-04

4.  Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span.

Authors:  L A Zebrowitz; K Olson; K Hoffman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-03

5.  The implications of sexual narcissism for sexual and marital satisfaction.

Authors:  James K McNulty; Laura Widman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2013-01-08

6.  When "negative" behaviors are positive: a contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction.

Authors:  James K McNulty; V Michelle Russell
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-04

Review 7.  The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul W Eastwick; Laura B Luchies; Eli J Finkel; Lucy L Hunt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample.

Authors:  S Sprecher; Q Sullivan; E Hatfield
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-06

10.  Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins; Christine E Garver-Apgar; P Niels Christensen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03
View more
  14 in total

1.  The association between discontinuing hormonal contraceptives and wives' marital satisfaction depends on husbands' facial attractiveness.

Authors:  V Michelle Russell; James K McNulty; Levi R Baker; Andrea L Meltzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Does support need to be seen? Daily invisible support promotes next day relationship well-being.

Authors:  Yuthika U Girme; Michael R Maniaci; Harry T Reis; James K McNulty; Cheryl L Carmichael; Shelly L Gable; Levi R Baker; Nickola C Overall
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2018-09-13

3.  Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment.

Authors:  Levi R Baker; James K McNulty; Laura E VanderDrift
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-04-03

4.  Capturing the Interpersonal Implications of Evolved Preferences? Frequency of Sex Shapes Automatic, but Not Explicit, Partner Evaluations.

Authors:  Lindsey L Hicks; James K McNulty; Andrea L Meltzer; Michael A Olson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-04-15

5.  Newlywed Couples' Own and Partner Sexual Disgust Sensitivities Interact to Predict Their Marital Satisfaction Through Their Sexual Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sierra D Peters; Andrea L Meltzer
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-04-09

6.  Narcissism and newlywed marriage: Partner characteristics and marital trajectories.

Authors:  Justin A Lavner; Joanna Lamkin; Joshua D Miller; W Keith Campbell; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2015-06-22

7.  The Association Between Relationship Orientation, Relationship Quality and Sexual Satisfaction.

Authors:  Philipp Yorck Herzberg; Swetlana Wildfang; Janine Quittschalle
Journal:  Int J Appl Posit Psychol       Date:  2022-09-10

8.  Honey, Do I Look Fat? Perceptions of Spouses' Weight and Weight Concerns Predict Marital Relationship Quality.

Authors:  Anna K Hochgraf; Susan M McHale
Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat       Date:  2019-10-15

9.  Sexual motivations during the menopausal transition among Iranian women: a qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Zeinab Javadivala; Effat Merghati-Khoei; Carol Underwood; Mojgan Mirghafourvand; Hamid Allahverdipour
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Our Grandmothers' Legacy: Challenges Faced by Female Ancestors Leave Traces in Modern Women's Same-Sex Relationships.

Authors:  Tania A Reynolds
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.