Literature DB >> 33835291

Newlywed Couples' Own and Partner Sexual Disgust Sensitivities Interact to Predict Their Marital Satisfaction Through Their Sexual Satisfaction.

Sierra D Peters1, Andrea L Meltzer2.   

Abstract

Sex is integral to maintaining a satisfying long-term romantic relationship such as marriage. It is thus important to identify the factors that promote sexual satisfaction in these relationships. To this end, we examined the extent to which a crucial evolved individual difference-sexual disgust sensitivity-impacts people's sexual satisfaction and relationship satisfaction. Using a two-year longitudinal study of 102 newlywed couples (204 individuals), we demonstrated that, rather than exerting main effects, the interaction of both couple members' sexual disgust sensitivities was indirectly associated with marital satisfaction through sexual satisfaction. People whose partners' sexual disgust sensitivities were relatively similar (versus dissimilar) to their own maintained higher levels of sexual satisfaction across the first two years of marriage, which was associated with similarly elevated marital satisfaction. Not only do these findings highlight the importance of integrating evolutionary perspectives and relationship science, they underscore the value of conducting dyadic research to examine the unique intersection of both couple members' characteristics for people's relationship outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evolutionary perspectives; Relationship satisfaction; Sexual disgust sensitivity; Sexual satisfaction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33835291     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-020-01872-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  38 in total

1.  Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: a longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships.

Authors:  E Sandra Byers
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2005-05

2.  What Keeps Passion Alive? Sexual Satisfaction Is Associated With Sexual Communication, Mood Setting, Sexual Variety, Oral Sex, Orgasm, and Sex Frequency in a National U.S. Study.

Authors:  David A Frederick; Janet Lever; Brian Joseph Gillespie; Justin R Garcia
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk : The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies.

Authors:  Bruce J Ellis; Aurelio José Figueredo; Barbara H Brumbach; Gabriel L Schlomer
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2009-06

Review 4.  Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science.

Authors:  Eli J Finkel; Paul W Eastwick; Harry T Reis
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-02

5.  From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples.

Authors:  D M Buss; T K Shackelford
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-02

Review 6.  The Psychology of Close Relationships: Fourteen Core Principles.

Authors:  Eli J Finkel; Jeffry A Simpson; Paul W Eastwick
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  A comparison of Bayesian synthesis approaches for studies comparing two means: A tutorial.

Authors:  Han Du; Thomas N Bradbury; Justin A Lavner; Andrea L Meltzer; James K McNulty; Lisa A Neff; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.273

8.  Associations Between Premarital Factors and First-Married, Heterosexual Newlywed Couples' Frequency of Sex and Sexual Satisfaction Trajectories.

Authors:  Emma E Altgelt; Andrea L Meltzer
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2019-12-13

Review 9.  Giving in to arousal or staying stuck in disgust? Disgust-based mechanisms in sex and sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Peter J de Jong; Mark van Overveld; Charmaine Borg
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2013

10.  Disgust versus Lust: Exploring the Interactions of Disgust and Fear with Sexual Arousal in Women.

Authors:  Diana S Fleischman; Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Daniel M T Fessler; Cindy M Meston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.