Literature DB >> 28368196

Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment.

Levi R Baker1, James K McNulty2, Laura E VanderDrift3.   

Abstract

Contemporary perspectives on relationship commitment posit that intimates decide whether or not to maintain a relationship based on their commitment to that relationship, and that they base such commitment partially on their current satisfaction with that relationship. Nevertheless, given that ending a relationship requires knowing about both the current state of the relationship and the likely future state of the relationship, we propose that people base their commitment to a relationship more on their expected future satisfaction with the relationship than on their current satisfaction with that relationship. Six studies provided evidence for these ideas. Study 1 demonstrated that expected satisfaction is shaped by not only current satisfaction but also several unique indicators of the likelihood of future satisfaction, including anticipated life events, plans to improve the relationship, and individual differences. Then, using a combination of cross-sectional, experimental, and longitudinal methods, Studies 2 through 6 demonstrated that (a) expected satisfaction was a stronger predictor of relationship commitment, maintenance behaviors, and/or divorce than was current satisfaction and (b) expected satisfaction mediated the association between current satisfaction and these outcomes. These findings highlight not only the need to incorporate expected satisfaction into extent perspectives on commitment, but also the importance of expectations for decision-making processes more broadly. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28368196      PMCID: PMC5411291          DOI: 10.1037/xge0000299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  61 in total

Review 1.  Attachment-related psychodynamics.

Authors:  Phillip R Shaver; Mario Mikulincer
Journal:  Attach Hum Dev       Date:  2002-09

2.  Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.

Authors:  J W ATKINSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Positive expectations in the early years of marriage: should couples expect the best or brace for the worst?

Authors:  James K McNulty; Benjamin R Karney; James K McNulty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-05

4.  The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: reliability, validity, and factor structure.

Authors:  Meifen Wei; Daniel W Russell; Brent Mallinckrodt; David L Vogel
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2007-04

5.  Neuroticism, marital violence, and the moderating role of stress and behavioral skills.

Authors:  Julianne C Hellmuth; James K McNulty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-07

6.  Sunken costs and desired plans: examining different types of investments in close relationships.

Authors:  Wind Goodfriend; Christopher R Agnew
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-09-08

Review 7.  How emotion shapes behavior: feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation.

Authors:  Roy F Baumeister; Kathleen D Vohs; C Nathan DeWall; Liqing Zhang
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-05

8.  Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities.

Authors:  S L Murray; J G Holmes; G MacDonald; P C Ellsworth
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-12

9.  Daily Affective and Behavioral Forecasts in Romantic Relationships: Seeing Tomorrow Through the Lens of Today.

Authors:  Edward P Lemay; Jonathan L Lin; Heather J Muir
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-05-28

10.  Shyness and marriage: does shyness shape even established relationships?

Authors:  Levi Baker; James K McNulty
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-04-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  A test of the investment model among asexual individuals: The moderating role of attachment orientation.

Authors:  Alexandra Brozowski; Hayden Connor-Kuntz; Sanaye Lewis; Sania Sinha; Jeewon Oh; Rebekka Weidmann; Jonathan R Weaver; William J Chopik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.